Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With or Without Buprenorphine After Inguinal Hernia Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05549492
Last Updated: 2022-09-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-01
2022-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Subarachnoid Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adults
NCT06219837
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02030223
Assessment of the Impact of Two Dexmedetomidine Dosages Added with Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06703229
Bilateral Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block in Epigastric Hernia Repair
NCT06092073
Recto-intercostal Facial Plane Block in Laparoscopic Hiatus Hernia Repair
NCT06820216
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block provides analgesia of the anterior and lateral abdominal wall below the umbilicus by blocking the T6-L1 segmental nerves as they lie within the fascial plane between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles: bilateral block for midline abdominal incision. It was first described in 2001 by Rafi as a traditional blind landmark technique using the lumbar triangle of Petit. Local anesthetic is then injected between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles just deep the fascial plane, the plane through which the sensory nerves pass
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group B
Candidates received 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine for TAP block
Ropivacaine 0.25%-NaCl 0.9% Injectable Solution
The pain level of the cases is evaluated by means of the digital pain (numeric rating) scale from 0 to 10 in which 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "the worst pain" as well as the duration of pain relief and the need for another dose of the same analgesic or other. The pain level is evaluated again if it is present.
Group RB
Candidates received 20 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine and 300 μg of buprenorphine, respectively, for the TAP block.
Ropivacaine 0.25%-NaCl 0.9% Injectable Solution
The pain level of the cases is evaluated by means of the digital pain (numeric rating) scale from 0 to 10 in which 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "the worst pain" as well as the duration of pain relief and the need for another dose of the same analgesic or other. The pain level is evaluated again if it is present.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine 0.25%-NaCl 0.9% Injectable Solution
The pain level of the cases is evaluated by means of the digital pain (numeric rating) scale from 0 to 10 in which 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "the worst pain" as well as the duration of pain relief and the need for another dose of the same analgesic or other. The pain level is evaluated again if it is present.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Medically free
Exclusion Criteria
2. allergic reaction to studied drugs, and history of epilepsy,
3. hydrodynamic instability,
4. chronic pain.
5. mental illness.
30 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Egymedicalpedia
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nirvana Elshalakany, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anesthesia and I.C.U. faculty of Medicine October six university, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
October 6 University Hospital
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Nirvana Ahmed 01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.