PROMs and Patellar Tracking After MPFL Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transposition
NCT ID: NCT05547269
Last Updated: 2025-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
11 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-17
2025-05-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
10-year Follow-up After Tibial Tubercle Transposition
NCT05629754
Comparison of Two Graft Choices in Mediale Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL)
NCT05706363
A Prospective Randomized Study of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction
NCT00816647
Repair of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Compared to Conservative Treatment for First Time Patella Dislocation
NCT02185001
The Impact of Tibial Tubercle-trochlear Groove Distance and Patellar Height on the Outcome of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
NCT03076008
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: Evaluate pre- and postoperative reported outcomes in patients receiving an soft tissue loop MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of patellar instability. Additionally, it is aimed to investigate the difference in patella tracking before and \~12 months after surgery measured with 4D CT imaging in patients receiving an MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT for the treatment of patellar instability.
Study design: Prospective single centre observational study.
Study population: 20 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who have received or will receive an soft-tissue loop MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT within the Radboudumc.
Main study parameters/endpoints: the main study parameter is the pre- and postoperative difference in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The secondary aim is to assess changes in patellar tracking (measured before and 12 months (to \~ 24 months) after surgery).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will undergo a 4D CT scan of their knees after their surgery. Whenever possible, the CT scans will be planned during the regular 12 month check-up appointment day so patients do not have to come separately to the Radboudumc for the CT scan. When the operation was \> 12 months ago and patients do have to come to the Radboudumc for the CT scan they will be compensated for their travel expenses with a bol.com gift card of 100 euros. The preoperative 4D CT scan and PROMS that will be used in this study are part of standard care. CT scanning exposes patients to radiation. For this study the level of radiation is estimated as an intermediate level of risk. No additional risks are associated with this study. Potential burdens for patients are predominantly time (for which they will be compensated with a gift card of 100 euros in case they have to come to the Radboudumc for the scan) and additional radiation exposure. No direct personal health benefit is expected. However, the knowledge generated with this study is expected to benefit future patients who need to undergo a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Recurrent patellofemoral instability, for which:
1. the patient will receive a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT, or
2. the patient has received a MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT , on the condition that the patient has a usable preoperative 4D CT scan.
* Informed consent of the patient.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients that are pregnant.
* BMI \> 35
* Patients that are unable to actively flex and extend their knee.
* Patellar stabilizing surgery other than the usual MPFL reconstruction with or without TTT. This includes: trochleoplasty, static MPFL reconstruction, isolated TTT
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4DCT-PROMs-MPFLr
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.