Conservative Versus Operative - First Time Patella Dislocations

NCT ID: NCT05533671

Last Updated: 2025-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-09-30

Study Completion Date

2032-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is no consensus regarding whether rehabilitation or surgical management is best for the management of a primary patellar dislocation. Consequently this prospective randomized controlled aims to compare the incidence of recurrent knee dislocations and patient reported outcomes of patients with primary patellar dislocations managed with surgery (medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction) compared to non-operative management (a standardized rehabilitation protocol, control group).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Long term sequalae of first-time patellar dislocations include recurrent knee instability, osteoarthritis, and a decreased quality of life, and yet there is no consensus on the best management for these patients. Despite an increasing trend toward investigating operative vs non-operative management of primary patellar dislocations, scarce level-1 evidence exists comparing the two treatment modalities. Indeed, the few meta-analyses suggesting improved outcomes of operative treatment for first time patellar dislocations mainly utilize retrospective cohort studies. A randomized-controlled trial of 39 patients with primary patellar dislocations with a mean age of 24 (21 operative vs 18 non-operative), found decreased rates of recurrent knee instability after a mean follow up of 44 months (0% in operative vs 35% in non-operative), and a higher Kujala knee score (88.9 in operative vs 70.8 in non-operative; p=0.001). A controlled but non-randomized prospective controlled trial among 69 patients with a mean age of 18, (30 operative vs 39 non-operative), found lower rates of recurrent knee instability after a mean follow up of 24 months (0% in operative vs 20.5% in non-operative and a higher Kujala knee score (86.3 in operative group vs 80.03 in non-operative; p \<0.05).The scarce randomized, prospective data investigating the appropriate management in primary patellar dislocations underscores the importance of the current study in providing high-quality evidence to the debate of how to best manage primary patellar dislocations. This study aims to compare the incidence of recurrent knee dislocations and patient reported outcomes of patients with primary patellar dislocations managed with surgery (medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction) compared to non-operative management (a standardized rehabilitation protocol, control group).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patella Dislocation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study will be a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating outcomes (recurrent dislocation rates and participant reported outcomes) in two groups of participants following a primary patella dislocation. Half of the participants will be randomized to operative intervention with a standard medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and the other half will be randomized to conservative management with a standardized rehabilitation protocol (non-operative group).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Operative Group

This group will have surgical procedure called a medial patellofemoral reconstruction where the kneecap is anchored back into its correct position)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

medial patellofemoral reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgery to correct dislocated (knocked out of place) knee cap. This surgery anchors the kneecap back into the correct position and supports the kneecap.

Non-operative group

This group will have physical therapy for their knee dislocation by following a specific rehabilitation plan.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-operative group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Physical therapy by following a specific regimen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

medial patellofemoral reconstruction

Surgery to correct dislocated (knocked out of place) knee cap. This surgery anchors the kneecap back into the correct position and supports the kneecap.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Non-operative group

Physical therapy by following a specific regimen.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 12 and older
* patients seen by the Columbia University Shoulder Elbow and Sports Medicine Service
* patients who experience a first-time patella dislocation

Exclusion Criteria

* coexistent ligament injury or osteochondral fracture necessitating acute surgical intervention
* previous knee surgery
* knee instability prior to injury
* inability or unwillingness to adhere to study participate
* lost to follow up
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Trofa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

David Trofa, MD

Role: CONTACT

212 305 5974

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

David P Trofa, MD

Role: primary

212-305-5974

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zheng X, Hu Y, Xie P, Cui M, Ma X, Feng YE, Gu J, Gao S. Surgical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction versus non-surgical treatment of acute primary patellar dislocation: a prospective controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2019 Jun;43(6):1495-1501. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4243-x. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30460463 (View on PubMed)

Xing X, Shi H, Feng S. Does surgical treatment produce better outcomes than conservative treatment for acute primary patellar dislocations? A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 24;15(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01634-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32209111 (View on PubMed)

Liu Z, Yi Q, He L, Yao C, Zhang L, Lu F, Zhang X, Wu M, Geng B, Xia Y, Jiang J. Comparing Nonoperative Treatment, MPFL Repair, and MPFL Reconstruction for Patients With Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):23259671211026624. doi: 10.1177/23259671211026624. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34604425 (View on PubMed)

Mackay ND, Smith NA, Parsons N, Spalding T, Thompson P, Sprowson AP. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Aug 8;2(8):2325967114544021. doi: 10.1177/2325967114544021. eCollection 2014 Aug.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26535352 (View on PubMed)

Bitar AC, Demange MK, D'Elia CO, Camanho GL. Traumatic patellar dislocation: nonoperative treatment compared with MPFL reconstruction using patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):114-22. doi: 10.1177/0363546511423742. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22016458 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAU0964

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.