Motivational Interviewing on Self-Care Activities in T2DM: The Sample of Turkey
NCT ID: NCT05544435
Last Updated: 2022-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
51 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-25
2020-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Design and Method:This study is a quasi-experimental clinical research with pre-test post-test comparison.12 sessions were held in 3 months in the experimental group with motivational interviewing method.
Findings:After a 3-month follow up, while a significant improvement was observed in post-intervention self-care activities in the experimental group, a significant decrease was observed in all self-care activities except foot care in the control group.
Practice Implications:Motivational interviewing intervention can be used to develop self-care activities in type 2 diabetes patients, especially to guide diabetes nurses.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Motivational Interviewing With Diabetes Patients
NCT05187806
Motivational Interviewing in Type 2 Diabetes Patients
NCT05844748
The Effect of Tele-Nursing Based Motivational Interviewing in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes:RCT
NCT05628259
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Diabetes Self-Management in Diabetic Patients
NCT06727123
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Diabetes Self-Management and Severity of Cyberchondria in Individuals With Diabetes
NCT06826703
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2.1. Intervention In addition to the care they always received, MI sessions were conducted by the researcher for the participants in the experimental group. This intervention was conducted as 30-45 minutes of 12 sessions in total for each patient for a period of 3 months by the academic nurse. In these sessions, the agenda was created in accordance with the nature of MI intervention, efforts were made to resolve the ambivalent feelings in the patient, the patient's change phase was determined, the patient's self-confidence for change was determined, it was questioned how much the patient cared for change and the patient was helped in determining the change plan. In addition, during the sessions, the problems patients experienced about self-care activities, the causes of these problems and the barriers in maintaining self-care activities were discussed and efforts were made to create awareness in patients.
In each MI session;
* Opening and structuring; Meeting, information was given about our role and goals in the study, how much time the investigators have, the role of the counselee and about there will be detailed questions during the study and the session was opened with the question What is on your mind?'
* Creating agenda: What are the investigators going to talk about today? (What would participants like to talk about today, having your blood sugar measured, eating healthily, getting your medication or exercising/Maybe there is something else?)
* Decision balance: Conflict was created in individuals by asking them to compare their existing healthcare behaviors and ideal/desired healthcare behaviors.
* Determining significance and confidence: How important is it for participants to fulfil self-care activities? How much confidence do participants have in yourself about this?
* Change plan: After decision balance was established, its suitability for patients was evaluated, at the end of the session, an action (change) plan was created for the desired behavior change and the session was closed by determining the next interview day-hour.
In the last MI session:
* The session was opened by summarizing the previous interview.
* A general discussion was made on change.
* Individuals' self-care activities were evaluated (The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care)
* Appointment was made from the hospital for individuals to have their glycemic values measured and the values were recorded (glycemic laboratory results).
* Closing.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motivational Interviewing
Intervention In addition to the care they always received, MI sessions were conducted by the researcher for the participants in the experimental group. This intervention was conducted as 30-45 minutes of 12 sessions in total for each patient for a period of 3 months by the academic nurse. In these sessions, the agenda was created in accordance with the nature of MI intervention, efforts were made to resolve the ambivalent feelings in the patient, the patient's change phase was determined, the patient's self-confidence for change was determined, it was questioned how much the patient cared for change and the patient was helped in determining the change plan. In addition, during the sessions, the problems patients experienced about self-care activities, the causes of these problems and the barriers in maintaining self-care activities were discussed and efforts were made to create awareness in patients.
Motivational İnterviewing
Motivational Interviewing (MI), which is one of these methods, is an individual-based counselling approach that can easily be used by nurses who have been trained to help the management of disease in chronic diseases (Berhe et al., 2020; Kızılırmak \& Demir, 2018; Maslakpak et al., 2020). The core principles of MI includes expressing empathy by providing acceptance and understanding, realizing inconsistencies, avoiding discussions and supporting self-efficacy (Matinolli et al., 2012). The main purpose of MI is to identify the ambivalent emotions that occur in the patient in health-related activities, to strengthen and encourage insights of patients by supporting healthy lifestyle changes and self-confidence (R.Miller \& Rollnick, 2013). Because of its flexibility and ability to be applied in different behavioural aspects, MI can be administered individually and in groups by trained individuals (Maslakpak et al., 2020).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motivational İnterviewing
Motivational Interviewing (MI), which is one of these methods, is an individual-based counselling approach that can easily be used by nurses who have been trained to help the management of disease in chronic diseases (Berhe et al., 2020; Kızılırmak \& Demir, 2018; Maslakpak et al., 2020). The core principles of MI includes expressing empathy by providing acceptance and understanding, realizing inconsistencies, avoiding discussions and supporting self-efficacy (Matinolli et al., 2012). The main purpose of MI is to identify the ambivalent emotions that occur in the patient in health-related activities, to strengthen and encourage insights of patients by supporting healthy lifestyle changes and self-confidence (R.Miller \& Rollnick, 2013). Because of its flexibility and ability to be applied in different behavioural aspects, MI can be administered individually and in groups by trained individuals (Maslakpak et al., 2020).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with T2DM at least six months ago
* To be literate
* Living in the city centre
* HbA1c value of 6.5% or higher
* Speak Turkish.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erzurum Technical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elanur Uludağ, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erzurum Technical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erzurum Technical University Faculty
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETÜ--ULUDAĞ---001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.