Patient Reported Outcomes Following Interventional Procedures in Pelvic Pain
NCT ID: NCT05531500
Last Updated: 2022-09-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-09
2023-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined PRF of the Pudendal Nerve With Ganglion Impar Block Effectively Alleviates Pudendal Neuralgia
NCT06461312
Trigger Point Injections and Pelvic Rehabilitation for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Myalgia and Sexual Pain
NCT02022722
New Approaches to Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Bladder Pain Syndrome
NCT06204874
Effects of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients and Healthy Controls
NCT05007743
Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Heparin/Bupivacaine Instillations
NCT06013449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Type of the study: A retrospective randomized controlled study Study Setting: University college London hospital
Sample Size Calculation:
Sample size calculation was carried out using G\*Power 3 software (Faul et al., 2007). A calculated minimum sample of the cases is 60 patients, 30 in each group.
Study tools (in detail, e.g., lab methods, instruments, steps, chemicals, …):
Total number of the cases is 60 patients, 30 in each group.
Intervention(s):
1. Informed written consent: - A copy of the signed Informed Consent form will be given to the participant.
The original signed form will be retained at the study site and a copy placed in the medical notes.
2. The patient is placed in the prone position
3. The ischial spine is then located using fluoroscopic X ray.
4. Aseptic cleaning of the skin in the target area
5. Patient will randomly be allocated to the control group receiving steroid and local anaesthetic injection or treatment group receiving pulsed radiofrequency treatment and local anaesthetic. Randomisation will be performed using sealed envelopes. I. Local anaesthetic and corticosteroid injection (control group)
▪ Under X-Ray guidance, the Needle (22G 5-10 cm insulated radiofrequency needle) is advanced perpendicular to the skin and placed transgluteally, directly avoiding the adjacent sciatic nerve at either the extremity of the ischial spine between the sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligaments.
* Sensory Electrostimulationis used to identify the nerve. For the motor stimulation, a unilateral contraction of the anal sphincter indicates that the inferior anal nerve had been stimulated while for the sensory stimulation, a sensation of tingling or numbness in the perineal region may be felt by the patient.
* Contrast injected to avoid intravascular injection. A blinded operator sets the radiofrequency machine for a timer alert at five minutes.
* After confirming the exact location of the needle tip, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine and 3.3 of dexamethasone in 1 mL are injected. II. Pulsed radiofrequency (Treatment/intervention group)
* Needle is placed using the same technique as above and contrast medium is injected.
* Lesion: - Radiofrequency current will be applied for 5 minutes, 120 ms, at 2 Hz, with maximum tissue temperature increased to 42°C. (usually not felt by the patient)
* 4 mL of 1% lidocaine and 1 mL of NaCl .9% are injected.
6. Post procedure instructions:- ▪ Standard post procedure monitoring for 1 hour in theatre recovery, including treatment of nausea/vomiting and localized pain with standard intravenous/oral medication.
* Immediate adverse events reporting.
* Standard hospital post procedure instructions
Research outcome measures:
1. Primary Endpoint:
Reduction in at least 1.5 point pain as measured by Numerical Rating Scale Secondary Endpoint A. NRS at 0, 1 and 12 weeks B Quality of Life Assessment at baseline, week 1, week 6 and week 12 a. EDQ5-5L b. SF-12 c. Brief Pain Inventory d. Global response Assessment C. Mood assessment at baseline, week 6 and week 12
a. Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire b. Beck Depression Inventory II c. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale d. Sexual function assessment (questionnaire) at baseline, weeks 6 and 12 e. Lower urinary tract symptom assessment at baseline, weeks 6 and 12 f. Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS-SF) g Review of pain medication use at weeks 6, 12 compared to baseline. h. Assessment of all patients against Nantes criteria at baseline
2.5-Data management and analysis (Details needed): Data collection. Telephone review - Week 1
1. Telephone review in 1 week to assess for complication and side effcte profile.
2. Global pelvic pain NRS scores over telephone.
3. Adverse events reporting.
b. Telephone review at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
1. review pelvic pain
2. Questionaires: global pelvic pain, QoL and function
3. Medication review
<!-- -->
1. S - Study/Statistical design (e.g. randomised controlled trial, case control study, pilot study):
2. Prospective
3. Parallel group ( 2 different groups)
4. No active Control
5. Randomized
6. Single blinded
7. multicentric study (at UCLH center)
Statistical methods:
i. All data will be collected and cleaned by Excel program then will be analyzed with SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 16, SSPS Inc, and Chicago, USA). ii. Continuous parametric data between two groups, two sample T test will be used.
iii. Continuous parametric data between more than 2 groups, ANOVA test will be used.
iv. Descriptive statistics will be done in the form of mean and standard error (SE).
v. Frequency of qualitative variables and Chi-square test will be done. vi. In Categorical data, Chi-squared test will be used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Injection
Injection of local anesthetic and steroid to the diseased nerve
Injection
Injection of local anesthetic + steroids
Radiofrequency
Application of radiofrequency to the diseased nerve
Radiofrequency
Application of radiofrequency on the diseased nerve
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Injection
Injection of local anesthetic + steroids
Radiofrequency
Application of radiofrequency on the diseased nerve
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged \> 18years
* Patients with unilateral or bilateral regional pelvic pain withpudendal irritation diagnosed by a pain clinician and clinically indicated to undergo pudendal nerve block by a consultant experienced in the field.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pelvic surgery is expected within 3 months
* Breastfeeding or pregnant women
* Known current pelvic/pelvic organ infection or malignancy (Red flags)
* Concurrent radiotherapy treatment to pelvis
* Allergy/sensitivity to lidocaine anaesthetic or/ and corticosteroids therapy
* Contraindication to receive a Pudendal nerve block eg high risk of bleeding
* Active psychiatric or mental conditions ▪ Other uncontrolled medical condition
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Medhat Farghaly
Assistant lecturer of anesthesia , Intensive care and pain medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medhat SA Farghaly, master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11608-006-0064-2
https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrcl/5/3/97.abstract
https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/FullText/2013/12000/The\_Effectiveness\_of\_Pudendal\_Nerve\_Block\_Versus.21.aspx
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:770659
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-6-177
https://books.google.com/books?hl=ar\&lr=\&id=FMU0AwAAQBAJ\&oi=fnd\&pg=PP1\&dq=+Chestnut+D,+Polley+L,+TsenL,Wong+C,+eds.+Chestnut%E2%80%99s+obstetric+anesthesia:+Principles+and+practice.\&ots=czX9TVymak\&sig=AVjCTsd6bT3TEKhgQ5BoBIJZuXg
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
pelvic pain outcome
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.