Evaluation of Low-cost Techniques for Detecting Sickle Cell Disease and β-thalassemia in Nepal and Canada

NCT ID: NCT05506358

Last Updated: 2024-06-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-20

Study Completion Date

2023-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder associated with acute illness and organ damage. In high resource settings, early screening and treatment greatly improve quality of life. In low resource settings, however, mortality rate for children is high (50-90%). Low-cost and accurate screening techniques are critical to reducing the burden of the disease, especially in remote/rural settings. The most common and severe form of SCD is sickle cell anemia (SCA), caused by the inheritance of genes causing abnormal forms of hemoglobin (called sickle hemoglobin or hemoglobin S) from both parents. The asymptomatic or carrier form of the disease, known as sickle cell trait (SCT), is caused by the inheritance of only one variant gene from one of the parents. In areas such as Nepal, β-thalassemia (another inherited blood disorder) and SCD are both prevalent, and some combinations of these diseases lead to severe symptoms.

The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of low-cost point-of-care techniques for screening and detecting sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, and β-thalassaemia, which will subsequently inform on feasible solutions for detecting the disease in rural, remote, or low-resource settings. One of the goals of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of techniques, such as the sickling test with low-cost microscopy and machine learning, HbS solubility test, commercial lateral-flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN), and the Gazelle Hb variant test, to supplement or replace gold standard tests (HPLC or electrophoresis), which are expensive, require highly trained personnel, and are not easily accessible in remote/rural settings.

The investigators hypothesize that:

1. an automated sickling test (standard sickling test enhanced using low-cost microscopy and machine learning) has a higher overall accuracy than conventional screening techniques (solubility and sickling tests) to detect hemoglobin S in blood samples
2. the automated sickling test can additionally classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals with a sensitivity greater than 90%, based on morphology changes of red blood cells, unlike conventional sickling or solubility tests that do not distinguish between SCD and SCT cases
3. Gazelle diagnostic device can detect β-thalassaemia and SCD/SCT with an overall accuracy greater than 90%, compared with HPLC as the reference test

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Overall, the hypothesis is that an assessment of the performance and accuracies of low-cost point-of-care techniques (automated sickling test, solubility test, lateral-flow assays, Gazelle Hb variant test) against HPLC tests will provide researchers and health workers with feasible alternative options for screening and detecting SCD, SCT and β-thalassaemia in a variety of situations based on the needs of the communities and the resources available.

Objectives

Objectives specific to the current study are to:

1. Determine accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of automated sickling test to detect HbS, compared to gold standard HPLC, and to conventional solubility test
2. Determine whether SCD, SCT and healthy individuals can be classified using the automated sickling test that leverages machine learning on images of blood films under hypoxia
3. Validate accuracy (\>95% sensitivity and specificity) of lateral- flow assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) to detect SCD/SCT, and of Gazelle variant test to detect SCD, SCT, and β-thalassaemia; and determine if low-cost techniques can potentially replace HPLC/electrophoresis tests in rural and remote settings

Long-term objectives of the overall project are to:

1. Implement trained machine learning algorithm to classify SCD, SCT and healthy individuals during screening tests in Nepal
2. Implement relevant low-cost point-of-care techniques in rural and remote communities of Nepal using insights and conclusions from current study

The plan of the study to screen the communities (e.g. in Nepalgunj, in Vancouver) using the following:

a. Low-cost screening i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques

De-identified data (images of blood films and associated documentation) will also be deposited in an online public repository, such as the Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR). FRDR is a service of the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (Alliance), a not-for-profit organization that supports digital research infrastructure in Canada. FRDR is hosted on national infrastructure, managed and administered by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sickle Cell Disease Sickle Cell Trait Beta-Thalassemia Sickle Cell-Beta Thalassemia Sickle Cell-SS Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Around 90 participants will be recruited in Canada - 30 with SCD (HbSS), 30 with SCT (HbAS), and 30 healthy participants (HbAA).

Around 120 participants will be recruited in Nepal - 20 with SCD (HbSS), 20 with SCT (HbAS), 20 with sickle cell / β-thalassaemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia (Hbβ/ β-thalassemia), 20 with β-thalassaemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β-thalassemia), and 20 healthy participants (HbAA).

3-4 mL of blood will be drawn using standard phlebotomy practices. The following tests will be performed:

a. Low-cost tests i. Sickling test with low-cost microscope and automated screening with machine learning ii. Sickling test with traditional microscope (conventional manual screening used in Nepal) iii. HbS solubility test iv. Commercial point-of-care assays (HemoTypeSC and Sickle SCAN) v. Gazelle Hb variant test

b. Gold standard test: HPLC, for determining the accuracies of low-cost screening techniques
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

All the participants and study team members will be informed of the tests and devices used in the study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1) HbSS; 2) HbAS; 3) HbS/β-thalassemia; 4)Hbβ/β-thalassemia; 5) HbA/β- thalassemia; 6) HbAA

Around 20 participants each (in Nepal):

* with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS)
* with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS)
* with the compound heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbS/β-thalassemia)
* with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia)
* with the carrier form of β-thalassemia (HbA/β-thalassemia)
* without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc.

Around 30 participants each (in Canada):

* with the homozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbSS)
* with the heterozygous form of sickle cell disease (HbAS)
* without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait, β-thalassemia, etc.

Group Type OTHER

High performance liquid chromatography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the D10 System by Bio-Rad Laboratories will be used as the gold standard test.

Automated sickling test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The standard sickling test using 2% sodium metabisulphite will be augmented using an automated microscope (such as Octopi) and machine learning, and will be used as one of the low-cost tests.

HbS solubility test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Standard HbS solubility test currently used in Nepal (e.g. Sicklevue) will be used as one of the low-cost tests

HemoTypeSC

Intervention Type DEVICE

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, HemoTypeSC (https://www.hemotype.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Sickle SCAN

Intervention Type DEVICE

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, Sickle SCAN (https://www.biomedomics.com/products/hematology/sicklescan/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Gazelle Hb Variant Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

A portable electrophoresis machine, Gazelle diagnostic device (https://hemexhealth.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High performance liquid chromatography

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using the D10 System by Bio-Rad Laboratories will be used as the gold standard test.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Automated sickling test

The standard sickling test using 2% sodium metabisulphite will be augmented using an automated microscope (such as Octopi) and machine learning, and will be used as one of the low-cost tests.

Intervention Type DEVICE

HbS solubility test

Standard HbS solubility test currently used in Nepal (e.g. Sicklevue) will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

HemoTypeSC

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, HemoTypeSC (https://www.hemotype.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sickle SCAN

A point-of-care lateral flow assay, Sickle SCAN (https://www.biomedomics.com/products/hematology/sicklescan/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Intervention Type DEVICE

Gazelle Hb Variant Test

A portable electrophoresis machine, Gazelle diagnostic device (https://hemexhealth.com/), will be used as one of the low-cost tests

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Since the techniques evaluated in the study aims at detecting sickle cell disease (SCD), sickle cell trait (SCT), and β- thalassemia, the following number of participants will be included in Nepal:

* 20 individuals with SCD (HbSS)
* 20 individuals with SCT (HbAS)
* 20 individuals with sickle cell/β-thalassemia compound heterozygous form (HbS/β-thalassemia)
* 20 individuals with β-thalassemia (Hbβ/β-thalassemia)
* 20 individuals with β-thalassemia trait or carrier form (HbA/β- thalassemia)
* 20 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia)

The following number of participants will be included in Canada:

* 30 individuals with SCD (HbSS)
* 30 individuals with SCT (HbAS)
* 30 healthy individual participants or normal participants (HbAA, participants without any known hemoglobin disorders, such as SCD, SCT or β-thalassemia)

Participants older than 1 year of age at the time of drawing blood will be eligible. Signed and dated consent or assent forms will be required by the participants or their parents/guardians.

Exclusion Criteria

* Transfusion within the last 3 months
* Pregnancy Participants who wish to withdraw from the study will also be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Boris Stoeber

Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and in the Department of Mechanical Engineering

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Boris Stoeber

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

BC Children's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Mount Sagarmatha Polyclinic and Diagnostic Center

Nepalgunj, Banke, Nepal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Nepal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shrestha P, Lohse H, Bhatla C, McCartney H, Alzaki A, Sandhu N, Oli PK, Chaudhary S, Amid A, Onell R, Au N, Merkeley H, Kapoor V, Pande R, Stoeber B. Evaluation of low-cost techniques to detect sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia: an open-label, international, multicentre study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Mar 29;35:100571. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100571. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40230447 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

85/2022

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H22-00294

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H21-01929

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

H22-00294

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sickle Cell Disease, Hemechip
NCT03948516 COMPLETED
Sickle Cell Anemia WE CARE
NCT03716726 COMPLETED NA