The Effect of ShotBlocker on Injection Pain

NCT ID: NCT05495542

Last Updated: 2022-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shotblocker is an effective approach to reduce injection pain. Generally, injection pain has been studied in children, but reducing injection pain in adults is an important issue. This study investigates the effect of ShotBlocker on pain and satisfaction levels associated with diphtheria-tetanus vaccination in pregnant women.

The sample of this prospective, single-blind randomized controlled experimental study consists of 146 pregnant women registered to the Family Health Center between October 2018 and June 2019. Women were assigned to ShotBlocker and control groups with 73 women in each group. The women's pulse rate was taken one minute before the injection by the researcher. In the ShotBlocker group was used ShotBlocker. The control group used the steps of administering a normal intramuscular injection. The pain and satisfaction related to the injection were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale and Visual Patient Satisfaction Scale after the vaccination. Pulse rates of the women were taken again by the researcher one minute after the injection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As the rate of vaccination increases, preventable diseases and their negative effects decrease; Nevertheless, the significance of vaccine-related side effects is increasing. The most prevalent complications in vaccine applications are local reactions such as pain, swelling, and erythema at the injection site. The most frequent pain in these reactions develops after diphtheria-tetanus vaccine in which aluminum is used as an adjuvant. Diphtheria-tetanus vaccine is generally administered to the deltoid region by intramuscular injection (IM), and most pregnant women complain about the pain that they experience during and after administration of diphtheria-tetanus vaccine. Nurses have a great responsibility in reducing and eliminating the pain felt by patients during operations. The success of pain management is related to nurses' knowledge and skills. If the pain that an individual will feel due to the piercing of the skin with a needle during intramuscular injection application is decreased or reduced to minimum, the anxiety and fear that the person will experience may abate. Therefore, to reduce pain and anxiety in individuals during injection; nurses use many non-pharmacological methods. ShotBlocker (Bionix, Toledo, OH) is one of the methods that can be used to reduce pain caused by IM injections. This small, flat, U-shaped plastic device used by holding it on the skin surface during injection did not have any side effects. ShotBlocker has a surface of 2 mm thick with rounded nubs to stimulate the skin. The surface of the plastic device is placed on the skin just before the injection; there is a hole in the center where the injection is administered. The rounded nubs on the surface of the plastic device do not damage the skin, these rounded nubs that create a slight pressure provide a warning for the Gate Control Theory. ShotBlocker's mechanism of action is thought to reduce pain by stimulating nerve endings faster with pressure of rounded nubs on the device. This stimulation decreases pain by blocking pain signals temporarily during injections and by inhibiting the central nervous system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Intramuscular Injection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
The participants in the study and the researcher who evaluated the pain were blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shotblocker group

In the ShotBlocker group, ShotBlocker was placed on the previously determined injection site before vaccination, and the vaccination was performed by holding it on the surface of the skin and pressing lightly with the fingertips. All vaccinations were carried out by an experienced nurse. ShotBlocker was removed after removing the needle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ShotBlocker

Intervention Type OTHER

ShotBlocker (Bionix, Toledo, OH) is one of the methods that can be used to reduce pain caused by IM injections. This small, flat, U-shaped plastic device used by holding it on the skin surface during injection did not have any side effects \[5\]. ShotBlocker has a surface of 2 mm thick with rounded nubs to stimulate the skin (Figure 1). The surface of the plastic device is placed on the skin just before the injection; there is a hole in the center where the injection is administered \[6\]. The rounded nubs on the surface of the plastic device do not damage the skin, these rounded nubs that create a slight pressure provide a warning for the Gate Control Theory \[7\]

Control group

In the control group, the steps of administering a normal intramuscular injection were used. Except for this, no additional method was used. All vaccinations were carried out by an experienced nurse.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ShotBlocker

ShotBlocker (Bionix, Toledo, OH) is one of the methods that can be used to reduce pain caused by IM injections. This small, flat, U-shaped plastic device used by holding it on the skin surface during injection did not have any side effects \[5\]. ShotBlocker has a surface of 2 mm thick with rounded nubs to stimulate the skin (Figure 1). The surface of the plastic device is placed on the skin just before the injection; there is a hole in the center where the injection is administered \[6\]. The rounded nubs on the surface of the plastic device do not damage the skin, these rounded nubs that create a slight pressure provide a warning for the Gate Control Theory \[7\]

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to speak and understand Turkish
* Those who volunteered to participate in the study and received written consent
* 18 years old and over
* Those with tetanus+diphtheria vaccination prescription/demand
* No vision-hearing-speech problems
* No secondary cause of acute pain other than intramuscular injection.
* Pregnant women who do not have a physical disability (burn, absence or amputation of an extremity, contracture, tissue necrosis, etc.) for injection into the deltoid muscle.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women who cannot speak Turkish
* Younger than 18
* Pregnant women who do not want to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bornova No. 25 Mevlana Family Health Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Merve Ince

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leyla KHORSHID, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Merve

Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Drago LA, Singh SB, Douglass-Bright A, Yiadom MY, Baumann BM. Efficacy of ShotBlocker in reducing pediatric pain associated with intramuscular injections. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;27(5):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.04.011.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19497458 (View on PubMed)

Romano CL, Cecca E. A new method to reduce pin-prick pain of intra-muscular and subcutaneous injections. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005 Oct;71(10):609-15. English, Italian.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16163151 (View on PubMed)

Cobb JE, Cohen LL. A randomized controlled trial of the ShotBlocker for children's immunization distress. Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):790-6. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181af1324.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19851160 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3023010044

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.