Speed of Injection and Pain During Routine Infant Vaccinations

NCT ID: NCT02504398

Last Updated: 2015-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vaccine injections are a significant source of pain for infants. Altering the injection speed when administering vaccines may be an effective intervention and is feasible (cost neutral). At present, there are no data regarding impact of injection speed on vaccine injection pain in infants. The aim of this study is to address this knowledge gap and to compare the impact of slow and fast vaccine injection speeds on pain during routine infant vaccinations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To date, there has been no evidence-based guidance regarding the rate at which vaccines should be injected to minimize pain. This has led to a disparity in practice. Some vaccinators favour a slow rate of injection (around 8-10 sec/mL) while others prefer a more rapid rate of injection (around 2-4 sec/mL).The slow injection method leads to a longer needle dwelling time with the increased possibility of the needle moving around and causing pain by damaging muscle tissue. Rapid injection, on the other hand, may lead to a sudden distension of muscle tissue, which itself could be painful. Allowing the muscle sufficient time to distend in order to accommodate the vaccine might minimize pain. This study will address the identified knowledge gap by comparing pain in infants undergoing routine vaccinations with a fast vs. slow injection speed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Routine Infant Immunizations Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fast injection

Vaccine injections will be given at a rate of approximately 2-4 ml/sec by the immunizer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fast injection speed by immunizer

Intervention Type OTHER

Slow injection

Vaccine injections will be given at a rate of approximately 10 ml/sec by the immunizer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Slow injection speed by immunizer

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fast injection speed by immunizer

Intervention Type OTHER

Slow injection speed by immunizer

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy 2 and 4 month old infants receiving their primary vaccine injections, PediacelTM (0.5mL) and PrevnarTM (0.5mL) (in conjunction with and preceded by oral RotarixTM vaccine) and healthy 6 month old infants receiving their routine vaccine injection, PediacelTM (0.5mL)

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants with impaired neurological development; history of seizures; administration of sedatives or narcotics in the preceding 24 hours; parental inability to use study tools; parent vaccine refusal; prior participation in the trial; and refusal to be video recorded
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anna Taddio

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pediatric Consultants

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: CONTACT

416-813-6235

Moshe Ipp, MD

Role: CONTACT

416-416-924-1661

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Moshe M Ipp, MD

Role: primary

416-924-1661

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: backup

416-813-6235

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taddio A, Wong H, Welkovics B, Ilersich AL, Cole M, Goldbach M, Ipp M. A randomized trial of the effect of vaccine injection speed on acute pain in infants. Vaccine. 2016 Sep 7;34(39):4672-4677. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27527817 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

31803

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.