Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-01
2019-04-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ShotBloker and Helfer Skin Tap Technique During Intramuscular Injection in Children
NCT05563233
The Effect of Audio Book and Local Vibration on Pain and Fear in Intramuscular Injection in Children
NCT06354608
Helfer Technique and ShotBlocker in Reducing Pain, Fear, and Anxiety in Children
NCT07190547
Comparison of Intramuscular Injection From Two Different Sites in Children
NCT05279144
Cold Vibratory Stimuli on Pain Perception Governing Infiltration Anesthesia in in Children
NCT05857033
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The children were included in one of the 3 study groups, including buzzy, shotblocker, and control group without any intervention. In order to control the effect of gender on pain, the children were stratified into study groups based on their gender and selected by using block randomization methods in three study groups. The children were randomized to the related study group by drawing one of the study groups in the cloth bags prepared for the girls (pink) and the boys (blue). Papers with the same color and folding pattern representing the four groups (1,2,3,4) were thrown in the bags. In order to provide a randomized distribution and to reduce all negative effects, the children were asked to take randomly a paper from the bag according to the gender after making the necessary explanation to the parents and their children so that the groups became self-balancing. A total of 30 children including 15 girls and 15 boys were included in each group after intervention and control groups were matched in themselves in terms of gender.
The study followed the CONSORT guideline for reporting randomized controlled trials. The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. The fear level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Children's Fear Scale. To assess the fear level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's fear level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Buzzy
Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed. The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.
Buzzy
Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.
Shotblocker
ShotBlocker is a small, flat, yellow horseshoe-shaped plastic tool that is non-invasive, appropriate for every age group, does not have the characteristics of medication or adverse effects. ShotBlocker has short, blunt points that provide contact with skin on one side, and a hole that exposes the injection site in the middle of the tool. It is used by being held on the skin surface during injection. The pointed surface of the tool is placed on the administration area right before the injection
Shotblocker
Injection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol.
Control
No intervention was performed to reduce pain and fear in the control group.
Control
No intervention was made in the children.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shotblocker
Injection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol.
Control
No intervention was made in the children.
Buzzy
Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections,
3. being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. receiving analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers,
3. having infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site,
4. having critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease
5. being unwilling to participate in the study.
6 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Burcu Aykanat Girgin
PhD RN, Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Burcu Aykanat Girgin, PhD RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Saglik Bilimleri University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saglik Bilimleri University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
07112018139
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.