Intramuscular Injection-Related Pain and Fear

NCT ID: NCT03915704

Last Updated: 2019-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is an experimental randomized controlled study conducted to compare the effect of buzzy and shotblocker methods applied during intramuscular injection from on pain and fear level in 6-12 year-old children. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were divided into 3 groups of 30 people, including shotblocker, buzzy, and control groups. Each intervention and control group was matched in terms of gender. In the study, the randomization of the sample group was performed by using stratification and block randomization methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a randomized controlled, non-blinded, experimental trial. The sample of the study consisted of 90 children aged between 6 and 12 years who were diagnosed with upper and lower tract respiratory infections and received intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone at the pediatric emergency department of a university hospital in İstanbul between November 2018 and April 2019. The children were recruited into the study on the basis of the following criteria: being aged between 6-12, requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent. Children were excluded if they had a disease causing chronic pain, received analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers, had infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site, had critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease, and were unwilling to participate in the study. Also, the parents were eligible for the participation when meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) be healthy in terms of neurologic functions, 2) communicate verbally, 3) understand and read Turkish, and 4) voluntarily sign the written informed consent. The sample size should be determined as minimum 30 in both experimental and control groups in the experimental studies and parametric measurements. Therefore, 90 children who met the inclusion criteria of the study between specified dates were enrolled and each group included 30 children including two experimental groups and a control group. In order to prevent bias and increase the validity of the data, the pain and fear scores of the children before and after the procedure were assessed by three different groups as children participating in the study (n:90), their parents (n:90), and a researcher specialized in pediatric nursing (n:1).

The children were included in one of the 3 study groups, including buzzy, shotblocker, and control group without any intervention. In order to control the effect of gender on pain, the children were stratified into study groups based on their gender and selected by using block randomization methods in three study groups. The children were randomized to the related study group by drawing one of the study groups in the cloth bags prepared for the girls (pink) and the boys (blue). Papers with the same color and folding pattern representing the four groups (1,2,3,4) were thrown in the bags. In order to provide a randomized distribution and to reduce all negative effects, the children were asked to take randomly a paper from the bag according to the gender after making the necessary explanation to the parents and their children so that the groups became self-balancing. A total of 30 children including 15 girls and 15 boys were included in each group after intervention and control groups were matched in themselves in terms of gender.

The study followed the CONSORT guideline for reporting randomized controlled trials. The pain level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To assess the pain level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's pain level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly. The fear level of children before and after the injection was assessed using Children's Fear Scale. To assess the fear level of the children, the children were asked to evaluate themselves, and their parents and first researcher were requested to evaluate the children's fear level immediately before and after the injection. The responses of the children, their parents, and the first researcher were scored blindly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Fear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Buzzy

Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed. The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buzzy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.

Shotblocker

ShotBlocker is a small, flat, yellow horseshoe-shaped plastic tool that is non-invasive, appropriate for every age group, does not have the characteristics of medication or adverse effects. ShotBlocker has short, blunt points that provide contact with skin on one side, and a hole that exposes the injection site in the middle of the tool. It is used by being held on the skin surface during injection. The pointed surface of the tool is placed on the administration area right before the injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shotblocker

Intervention Type DEVICE

Injection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol.

Control

No intervention was performed to reduce pain and fear in the control group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No intervention was made in the children.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shotblocker

Injection was administered with ShotBlocker.The Shotblocker application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the shotblocker was wiped with 70% alcohol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control

No intervention was made in the children.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Buzzy

Buzzy was placed 3-5 cm above the injection site 60 sec before the injection and used until the procedure was completed.The Buzzy application to all children in this group was done by the second researcher. After the injection, the ice pack was wiped with 70% alcohol and frozen again by freezing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. being aged between 6-12,
2. requiring for ceftriaxone intramuscular injection because of upper and lower respiratory tract infections,
3. being cognitively able to rate pain and fear scales, and voluntariliy signing the written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. having a disease causing chronic pain,
2. receiving analgesics within the last 6 hours, with pacemakers,
3. having infection, rash, or detoriorated skin integrity in the site where the injection was to be made, had nerve damage in the injection site,
4. having critical or unstable health status, had intellectual disability, reynaud's syndrome, and sickle cell disease
5. being unwilling to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Burcu Aykanat Girgin

PhD RN, Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Burcu Aykanat Girgin, PhD RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Saglik Bilimleri University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saglik Bilimleri University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07112018139

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Buzzy® Application in Pain
NCT04990648 COMPLETED NA
The Effect of SHOTBLOCKER
NCT06956066 COMPLETED NA