Effect of Suturing Protocols on Coronally Advanced Flap for Root Coverage Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT05472233

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate whether suturing protocols (suture removal timing) influence root coverage outcomes in recession defects treated with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to assess whether the timing of suture removal may influence the number of sites exhibiting complete coverage (CRC) or the mean root coverage (MRC) obtained in single-tooth recession-type defects treated by coronally advanced flap (CAF).

Records from patients that underwent a coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure for root coverage will be analyzed. This surgical procedure is aimed at the treatment of root recessions that may arise following periodontal disease or mechanical trauma. The procedure, after obtaining deep local anesthesia, involves a sulcular incision on the buccal side and extending the incision mesially and distally to the base of the adjacent papillae. Two vertical incisions are then made at the corner of the adjacent tooth line and extended into the alveolar mucosa. A mixed thickness flap is then elevated and coronally advanced by releasing incisions through the periosteum to allow for flap placement to cover the recession without tension. The papillae are de-epithelized to provide the bed of connective tissue for the adaptation of the flap which is then sutured with single stitches.

The records, complete with photographic documentation, of all patients who have undergone this procedure will be identified and will be divided into two groups: those in which the sutures were removed at 2 weeks and those in which the sutures were removed at 3 or more weeks.

CRC as present or absent (yes/no) and MRC (percentage of roof surface that has been successfully covered) six months after surgery will be assessed in these patients.

The presence of patient discomfort on the day of suture removal will be recorded as present / absent to assess whether the permanence of the sutures for longer or shorter influences the patient's perception of the surgery.

The results will be compared between the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Retrospective cohort study
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2weeks

Suture removal at 2 weeks post intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture removal after Coronally Positioned Flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are removed after different healing period post coronally positioned flap surgery, this latter is a procedure that aims at surgically advancing the gingiva in order to cover dehiscences of the soft tissues uncovering dental roots.

3+weeks

Suture removal at 3 weeks minimum post intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suture removal after Coronally Positioned Flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sutures are removed after different healing period post coronally positioned flap surgery, this latter is a procedure that aims at surgically advancing the gingiva in order to cover dehiscences of the soft tissues uncovering dental roots.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suture removal after Coronally Positioned Flap

Sutures are removed after different healing period post coronally positioned flap surgery, this latter is a procedure that aims at surgically advancing the gingiva in order to cover dehiscences of the soft tissues uncovering dental roots.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients not affected by active periodontitis
* Single recessions on non-restored non-molar teeth
* CAF protocols using vertical releasing incisions
* records of patients clearly reporting timing of suture removals and root coverage outcomes at 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Adjacent recessions
* Recessions on molar teeth
* Coronally advanced flaps without releasing incisions
* Patients with active periodontitis
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cagliari

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicola Alberto Valente, DDS, MS, PhD

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Policlinico Duilio Casula, AOU Cagliari

Monserrato, CA, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L. The Effect of Suturing Protocols on Coronally Advanced Flap Root-Coverage Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Periodontol. 2016 Feb;87(2):148-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150394. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26447751 (View on PubMed)

Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravida A, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Rasperini G, Wang HL. Influence of suturing technique on marginal flap stability following coronally advanced flap: a cadaver study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1641-1651. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2597-5. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30151706 (View on PubMed)

Huang LH, Wang HL. Sling and tag suturing technique for coronally advanced flap. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Aug;27(4):379-85.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17726994 (View on PubMed)

Huang LH, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol. 2005 Oct;76(10):1729-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1729.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16253095 (View on PubMed)

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, Langer B, McGuire MK, Richardson CR, Zabalegui I, Zadeh HH. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S52-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.140376. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25315018 (View on PubMed)

Chambrone L, Pannuti CM, Tu YK, Chambrone LA. Evidence-based periodontal plastic surgery. II. An individual data meta-analysis for evaluating factors in achieving complete root coverage. J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):477-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110382. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21859324 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Perio1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.