RCT Comparing EVLA Versus Polidocanol Foam in the Treatment of SSV Insufficiency
NCT ID: NCT05468450
Last Updated: 2022-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
161 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-01
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endovenous Laser Therapy (EVLT) for Sapheno-Popliteal Incompetence and Short Saphenous Vein (SSV) Reflux: A RCT
NCT00841178
Randomized, Single Blind, Placebo Controlled, to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Polidocanol Injectable Foam for Treatment of Symptomatic, Visible Varicose Veins With SFJ Incompetence
NCT00758420
Study of Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Ambulatory Phlebectomy
NCT03416413
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Laser Ablation of the Incompetent Small Saphenous Vein
NCT02248740
Caprini Score in Venous Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study
NCT03041805
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To date, no RCTs have directly compared UGFS and EVLA for SSV treatment. The French Society of Phlebology (SFP) decided to compare these two most utilised endovenous treatments in France in a controlled study called the FOam VErsus LAser in the SSv (FOVELASS) study, involving 13 investigators in 11 vascular medical centres.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
A blind third-party check was carried out, only at 3 years, and those assessors were completely independent of the study and blinded.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS)
Injection of Polidocanol foam into SSV
Ultrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using Polidocanol sclerosant
Direct injection Foam sclerotherapy
Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA)
Ablation of SSV using laser energy
Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA)
EVLA using a 1470nm generator and 600-micron radial fibres (Biolitec® Biomedical Technology, Jena, Germany), under tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using Polidocanol sclerosant
Direct injection Foam sclerotherapy
Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA)
EVLA using a 1470nm generator and 600-micron radial fibres (Biolitec® Biomedical Technology, Jena, Germany), under tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* underlying isolated SSV incompetence (SSV reflux time\>0.5sec on duplex ultrasound (DUS))
* reflux involving at least 15 cm of proximal SSV
* minimal SSV diameter of 4 mm at mid-calf (luminal diameter in standing position)
Exclusion Criteria
* post-thrombotic disease
* deep or superficial vein thrombosis of less than 3 months duration
* coexistent ipsilateral GSV insufficiency
* morbid obesity (BMI\>40)
* presence of significant arterial disease (ABPI\<0.5)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Societe Francaise de Phlebologie
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudine Hamel-Desnos
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut des Varices- GHPJS Groupe Hospitalier
Matthieu Josnin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Société Française de Phlébologie
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
9) Hamel-Desnos C., Josnin M., Allaert F.-A. Etude contrôlée randomisée de l'efficacité du laser endoveineux (1470 nm) versus échosclérothérapie à la mousse dans le traitement de l'insuffisance de la petite veine saphène. Phlébologie 2019 (72): 8-18
Hamel-Desnos C, Nyamekye I, Chauzat B, Gracia S, Josnin M, Abbadie F. FOVELASS: A Randomised Trial of Endovenous Laser Ablation Versus Polidocanol Foam for Small Saphenous Vein Incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Mar;65(3):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-A01943-44
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.