Endovenous Ablation With and Without Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities

NCT ID: NCT01197833

Last Updated: 2021-04-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

117 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different doses of an investigational drug, Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) compared to vehicle (inactive solution) when used following an approved heat treatment in subjects with varicose veins.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence Visible Varicosities

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125%

Endovenous ablation followed by an injection of polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125% to target vein

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125%

Intervention Type DRUG

All components except API

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable micrfoam, 1.0%

Endovenous ablation followed by injection of polidocanol injectable microfoam, 1.0% to the target vein

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 1.0%

Intervention Type DRUG

endovenous ablation to target vein, followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%

endovenous ablation+vehicle (placebo)

endovenous ablation followed by injection of vehicle (placebo) to target vein

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Intervention Type DRUG

Endovenous ablation to target vein followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125%

All components except API

Intervention Type DRUG

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 1.0%

endovenous ablation to target vein, followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%

Intervention Type DRUG

Endovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Endovenous ablation to target vein followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

endovenous ablation followed by polidocanol endovenous microfoam 0.125% injection to target vein Endovenous ablation followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 1.0% to target vein Endovenous ablation to target vein followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Incompetence of SFJ
* Patients who are candidates for ETA \[laser or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)\]
* Symptomatic varicose veins
* Visible varicose veins
* Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent and complete study questionnaires in English

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who only have telangiectatic or reticular veins (Clinical Finding C1, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders)
* Patients who have active ulceration on the leg to be treated (Clinical Finding C6, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders)
* Leg obesity impairing the ability to access the vein to be treated and/or to apply post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
* Ultrasonographic or other evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis or occlusion
* Deep venous reflux unless clinically insignificant in comparison to superficial reflux
* Peripheral arterial disease precluding the wearing of post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
* Reduced mobility
* History of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or stroke, including evidence of prior DVT on duplex ultrasound
* Major surgery, prolonged hospitalization or pregnancy within 3 months of screening
* Major co-existing disease (e.g. malignancy; pulmonary disease; renal or hepatic insufficiency; serious skin disease/condition that may compromise the ability of the patient to comply with the compression protocol, etc.)
* Known allergic response to polidocanol or heparin, including history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and/or multiple allergic reactions
* Current alcohol or drug abuse
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oak Brook, Illinois, United States

Site Status

North Tonawanda, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vasquez M, Gasparis AP; Varithena(R) 017 Investigator Group. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation with or without polidocanol endovenous microfoam treatment in patients with great saphenous vein incompetence and visible varicosities. Phlebology. 2017 May;32(4):272-281. doi: 10.1177/0268355516637300. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26957489 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VAP.VV017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.