Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-01-01
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vacuum-assisted Laser Ablation (VALA) for Treatment of Large Saphenous Veins
NCT06971068
Mechanochemical Ablation vs Thermal Ablation
NCT03722134
Safety Distance for Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein
NCT03946644
Retrospective Review of Saphenous Vein Incompetence: Venaseal Versus Endovenous Thermal Ablation
NCT04006184
Endovenous Laser Ablation in Acute Thrombophlebitis of the Varicose Great Saphenous Vein
NCT05001776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The diameter of GSV at the 15-cm below the SFJ level was the main criterion to identify two groups of patients. Those with the GSV diameter ≤ 6 mm were treated with ASVAL. If the diameter of GSV was \> 6 mm, EVLA with concomitant phlebectomy was performed.
All surgical procedures were accomplished by the same surgeon, using tumescent local anesthesia (i.e. 0,1% lidocaine and sodium bicarbonate solution without epinephrine).The EVLA was done under duplex guidance with a 1560-nm diode laser using bare fibres via a Seldinger wire technique. The GSV was cannulated at the lowest point of the reflux. The laser fiber was advanced below the SFJ at the level of v. epigastrica sup. after which the GSV was ablated during gradual withdrawal of the fibre. The 15 Watts laser power was delivered in a continuous pull back traction. The average applied linear endovenous energy dose (LEED) was 75,3 J/cm.
Peripheral side branches were removed by multiple stab avulsions in both groups. After the treatment, the leg was wrapped in sterile absorbent bandages, and compression stockings class II (23-32 mm Hg) were put on and recommended to wear for two weeks. All patients were discharged on the day of the treatment and were invited to a follow-up duplex ultrasonography (DUS) on the 1st post-operative day, 2 years and 5 years after the operation (patients were contacted by phone). DUS at follow-up visits was carried out by an independent specialist who was not involved in the initial treatment of the patients. To report clinical recurrence after EVLA we have used Group d' Evaluation des Lasers et de l'Echographie Vasculare (GELEV) score.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ASVAL - group
GSV diameter ≤ 6 mm
ASVAL
Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation under Local Anesthesia
EVLA-group
GSV diameter \> 6 mm
EVLA
Endovenous Laser Ablation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ASVAL
Ambulatory Selective Varices Ablation under Local Anesthesia
EVLA
Endovenous Laser Ablation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary symptomatic varicose veins, Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification, clinical class C2-C3
* Physical status according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II (I-Healthy, non-smoking, no or minimal alcohol use; II-Mild diseases only without substantive functional limitations)
Exclusion Criteria
* Small saphenous vein, anterior or posterior accessory saphenous vein incompetence at the same limb
* Deep venous thrombosis, thrombophilia associated with a high risk of deep venous thrombosis or postthrombotic syndrome
* Arterial occlusive disease more severe than Intermittent claudication after more than 200 meters of pain free walking (Fontaine IIA) and/or ankle brachial index below 0.8
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Belarusian State Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ihar Ihnatovich
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Genadz Kandratsenka, Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Educational Institution"Belarusian State Medical University"
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Educational Institution"Belarusian State Medical University"
Minsk, Dzerzhinski Ave., 83, Belarus
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Persistent incompetent truncal veins should not be treated immediately. Phlebology. 2015 Mar;30(1 Suppl):98-106. doi: 10.1177/0268355515569141.
Chastanet S, Pittaluga P. Influence of the competence of the sapheno-femoral junction on the mode of treatment of varicose veins by surgery. Phlebology. 2014 May;29(1 suppl):61-65. doi: 10.1177/0268355514529207. Epub 2014 May 19.
van Neer P, Kessels FG, Estourgie RJ, de Haan EF, Neumann MA, Veraart JC. Persistent reflux below the knee after stripping of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):831-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
Zolotukhin IA, Seliverstov EI, Zakharova EA, Kirienko AI. Short-term results of isolated phlebectomy with preservation of incompetent great saphenous vein (ASVAL procedure) in primary varicose veins disease. Phlebology. 2017 Oct;32(9):601-607. doi: 10.1177/0268355516674415. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Harlander-Locke M, Jimenez JC, Lawrence PF, Derubertis BG, Rigberg DA, Gelabert HA. Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebectomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.054. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
Puggioni A, Kalra M, Carmo M, Mozes G, Gloviczki P. Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.014.
Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 30;(7):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20140451
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.