Ultrasonographic Morphology Assessment of Low-grade Carotid Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT05437991
Last Updated: 2024-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-29
2023-01-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
When diagnosing CS, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine bulb and ICA origin obstruction rates. The reference method of quantifying CS is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.
Two methods of CS morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site (ECST method) or to the downstream ICA diameter (NASCET method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of ICA, ECST appears to be more suitable for CS quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice. This technique has not yet been evaluated, although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Progression Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Ultrafast Ultrasound Flow Imaging
NCT05270005
Carotid Ultrasound Sub-Study of the Familial Atherosclerosis Study-observational Study
NCT00976014
Evaluation of the Benefit of Exercise Testing for the Diagnosis of Obstruction in the Coronary Arteries of the Heart
NCT05140434
Improved Image Quality for Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Ultrafast Ultrasound FLOW Imaging
NCT06170580
Prognosis of Coronary Stenosis Based on Intracoronary Imaging; A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study
NCT02792075
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When carotid stenosis is diagnosed, an Echo-Doppler is performed to determine the bulb and internal carotid artery origin obstruction rates. The reference method for quantifying carotid stenosis is based on hemodynamic criteria that only allow the diagnosis of high grade stenosis thresholds (50%-70%). Below 50%, low-grade stenosis, patient follow-up is limited and could be based on morphological criteria; ultrasound imaging being a reference technique for human body structures morphological assessment, especially vessels.
Two methods of carotid stenosis morphological quantification with Doppler ultrasound currently exist. Calibre reduction at the maximum of stenosis can be measured by relating the smallest luminal diameter to the vessel diameter at stenosis site ("European Carotid Surgical Trial" (ECST), European method) or to the downstream internal carotid artery diameter ("North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial" (NASCET), North American method). As bulb diameter measures ≈1.8 times that of the internal carotid artery, the NASCET appears to be more suitable for carotid stenosis quantification. For high-grade stenosis, morphological quantification performance is impaired due to extensive calcification of large atheromatous plaques. However, it is possible that less calcified nature of low-grade stenosis and the use of a rigorous methodology will allow reproducible assessment in routine practice.
This technique has not yet been evaluated although it is a frequent situation in patient follow-up. This study therefore suggests to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of morphological quantification of these stenosis by the ECST method with a precise methodology.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Morphological quantification of low-grade carotid stenosis
Morphological quantification using ECST method and implying two independent observers
Independent morphological quantifications by echo-doppler using ECST method
The physician who is usually in charge of patient follow-up performs a first evaluation of carotid stenosis percentage by echo-doppler using ECST method. Then a second physician immediately performs a second evaluation using the same echo-doppler device without knowing first evaluation conclusions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Independent morphological quantifications by echo-doppler using ECST method
The physician who is usually in charge of patient follow-up performs a first evaluation of carotid stenosis percentage by echo-doppler using ECST method. Then a second physician immediately performs a second evaluation using the same echo-doppler device without knowing first evaluation conclusions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient 18 years of age or older
* Atheromatous arterial disease with stenosis \< 50% (maximum systolic velocity \< 125 cm/sec for an angle of 50-60°) in at least one carotid artery
Exclusion Criteria
* Unavailability of two physicians to perform examination
* Patient under judicial protection (guardianship, curators...) or justice safeguard
* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman
* Any other reason that could interfere with study objectives evaluation in the investigator opinion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frédéric GIAUFFRET, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Sainte Musse
Toulon, Var, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Giauffret F, Hocq F, Lafond S, Autret A, Elias A, European Carotid Surgical Trial-based diameter measurement using B-mode ultrasound imaging to quantify low-grade carotid artery stenosis: the QUAMUS study. JVS-Vascular Insights. Volume 2, 2024, 100061
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A00854-39
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2022-CHITS-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.