System Dynamics Model for Acute Non-contact Lower Extremity Injuries Prediction
NCT ID: NCT05425303
Last Updated: 2025-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
99 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-22
2025-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adductor Endurance Test: Validity and Reliability
NCT07297537
Dynamic Balance, Flexibility and Agility as Predictors of Lower-extremity Injury in Football Players
NCT04232527
Hamstring Strain in High School Athletes
NCT03248011
Sprint Performance in Football Players With a Previous Hamstring Injury
NCT03306511
Acute Hamstring Strains in Danish Elite Soccer - Diagnosis and Biomechanical Tests
NCT00556517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Appropriate hamstring muscle function is essential for the execution of most athletic activities. Muscle injuries, especially the hamstrings muscles, are among the injuries with the higher incidence in team sports. Specifically, muscle injuries constitute approximately one-third of all time-loss injuries in European football clubs, whereas injuries in the hamstrings muscle represent 12% of all injuries. Moreover, the financial impact of the one-month rehabilitation of a player with an HSI in a European team is equal to 500.000 euros. Recently, a systematic review examined 179 HSI's related risk factors and concluded that there is a need to explore these factors' complex and nonlinear interrelationship. Τhe utilization of complex systems computational methods in the sports injury field provides a valid insight into injury etiology and, consequently, a more effective injury prediction.
SD modeling and its application to health-related research has been rapidly increasing over the last few years. Examples of successful SD applications include the topics of obesity and diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, and other chronic diseases in order to capture and better understand the complex etiology and the recovery of the concussion.
To sum up, the SD modeling method has proven to be an effective approach to deal with health system problems. However, to the investigators' knowledge, no study has been carried out using SD modeling in order to investigate the complex and dynamic nature of interaction among the factors that contribute to HSI.
Aim of the study
This study aims first to develop a System Dynamics for Lower Extremity (SDLE) model for evaluating the risk of hamstrings injuries. Further, the model will be calibrated and validated with real data to quantify the factors' interaction and test the ability of the model to predict HSIs. The final aim is to test plausible prevention strategies and propose appropriate policies.
Methodology
General description of methodological procedure of the SDLE project The proposed project's methodological phases and the proposed study's timetable are presented. Following a clear problem statement, a review of HSI risk factors is to be carried out. Risk factors will be used as variables for developing the SDLE model. This will be facilitated by initially employing the causal loop modeling technique in a series of co-creation workshops with the main stakeholders. Here, the methodology of Group Modeling Building (GMB) will be employed. The aim is to get valuable input from stakeholders such as sports physiotherapists, doctors, coaches, and sports scientists. The output of the co-creation workshops will be a causal loop model depicting the main interrelationships among the HSI risk factors. The creation of the CLD will serve as a communication tool to share the various mental models that exist among stakeholders. Following the development of the CLD in agreement with the stakeholders, we will proceed to the stock and flow model, whereby we quantify the variables identified in the CLD and distinguish between stocks and flows. Then, the formulated SDLE model will be calibrated using real data (risk factors, injuries, exposure rate) from team sports athletes. The final step will be running the simulation model through sensitivity analysis. We will carry out experiments by testing plausible interventions prior to implementation to reduce the risks and tackle the problem of hamstrings injuries. The main phases of the proposed project are described in more detail as follows.
SDLE model validation with real data
Teams' sports athletes will be invited to participate in this study. The athlete should be free of injury for at least six months or fully rehabilitated from a previous injury to participate in the study. In this phase, a one-year prospective cohort study will be conducted. This phase includes pre-season measurements, injuries and exposure rate data collection during the season, and follow-up measurements in the middle of the season. The recorded data will be inserted into the formulated SDLE model to calibrate and validate the model. Firstly, demographic details and medical history will be collected. Then, specific biomechanical measurements will be assessed.
Data processing and statistical analysis
The structural equation model approach (SEM) will be used to quantify the interrelationships among collecting variables. Structural equation modeling is a set of statistical techniques used to measure the complex relationships among variables to test the validity of theory using real data.
Sensitivity analysis and scenario planning
After the SDLE model has been calibrated and validated, different scenarios will be assessed. Different interventions will be applied in order to evaluate the impact of these interventions by means of the SDLE simulation model. As a result, effective policies for tackling the problem of acute noncontact LE injuries will be proposed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy athletes
Healthy professorial team sports athletes will be monitored for the occurrence of an acute lower extremity injury during a competitive season. After the end of the season, the cohort will be divided into a healthy athlete group, athletes injured in the hamstring muscles, and athletes with other types of lower extremity injuries.
Exposure to risk for injury
Athletes will be examined in the preseason stage and will be monitored during the competitive season.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposure to risk for injury
Athletes will be examined in the preseason stage and will be monitored during the competitive season.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healthy team sports athletes fully participating in the team's activities.
* The athlete should be free of injury at the time of measurements or fully rehabilitated from a previous injury.
Exclusion Criteria
17 Years
40 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Patras
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nikolaos I. Liveris
Assistant researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sofia A Xergia, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Patras
Elias Tsepis, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Patras
George Papageorgiou, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
European University Cyprus
Konstantinos Fousekis, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Patras
Charis Tsarbou, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Patras
Nikolaos I Liveris, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Patras
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Patras
Pátrai, Rio, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ekstrand J, Hagglund M, Walden M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546510395879. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
Ekstrand J, Walden M, Hagglund M. Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men's professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(12):731-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Finch CF, Kemp JL, Clapperton AJ. The incidence and burden of hospital-treated sports-related injury in people aged 15+ years in Victoria, Australia, 2004-2010: a future epidemic of osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.165. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
Green B, Bourne MN, van Dyk N, Pizzari T. Recalibrating the risk of hamstring strain injury (HSI): A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for index and recurrent hamstring strain injury in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;54(18):1081-1088. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100983. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Opar DA, Serpell BG. Is there a potential relationship between prior hamstring strain injury and increased risk for future anterior cruciate ligament injury? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
Bittencourt NFN, Meeuwisse WH, Mendonca LD, Nettel-Aguirre A, Ocarino JM, Fonseca ST. Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition-narrative review and new concept. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;50(21):1309-1314. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095850. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Hulme A, Mclean S, Salmon PM, Thompson J, Lane BR, Nielsen RO. Computational methods to model complex systems in sports injury research: agent-based modelling (ABM) and systems dynamics (SD) modelling. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(24):1507-1510. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100098. Epub 2018 Nov 17. No abstract available.
Kenzie ES, Parks EL, Bigler ED, Wright DW, Lim MM, Chesnutt JC, Hawryluk GWJ, Gordon W, Wakeland W. The Dynamics of Concussion: Mapping Pathophysiology, Persistence, and Recovery With Causal-Loop Diagramming. Front Neurol. 2018 Apr 4;9:203. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00203. eCollection 2018.
Fousekis K, Tsepis E, Poulmedis P, Athanasopoulos S, Vagenas G. Intrinsic risk factors of non-contact quadriceps and hamstring strains in soccer: a prospective study of 100 professional players. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;45(9):709-14. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.077560. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
De Blaiser C, De Ridder R, Willems T, Danneels L, Vanden Bossche L, Palmans T, Roosen P. Evaluating abdominal core muscle fatigue: Assessment of the validity and reliability of the prone bridging test. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Feb;28(2):391-399. doi: 10.1111/sms.12919. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):941-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90087-4.
Coorevits P, Danneels L, Cambier D, Ramon H, Vanderstraeten G. Assessment of the validity of the Biering-Sorensen test for measuring back muscle fatigue based on EMG median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):997-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.10.012. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A, Andersen TE, Bahr R, Dvorak J, Hagglund M, McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;40(3):193-201. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.025270.
Beran TN, Violato C. Structural equation modeling in medical research: a primer. BMC Res Notes. 2010 Oct 22;3:267. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-267.
Darabi N, Hosseinichimeh N. System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36(1):29-73.
Hovmand P, Rouwette E, Andersen D, et al. Scriptapedia: A Handbook of Scripts for Developing Structured Group Model Building Sessions. Soc Sci Med. 2011
Sterman JD. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill; 2000.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12126
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.