Simultaneous Implant Placement With Autogenous Bone Ring

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aiming to evaluate bone gain and secondary stability in autogenous bone ring technique using trephine bur compared to control group of sticky bone.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Internal Sinus Lifting in Delayed Implant Placement

NCT05495490

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation

RECRUITING NA

L- Shape Symphyseal Autogenous Bone Block for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Anterior Maxilla and Mandible

NCT05844540

Atrophic Anterior Alveolar Ridge

COMPLETED NA

Transcrestal Sinus Lift Using Osseodensification Versus Lateral Window Technique

NCT06126536

Dental Implant Sinus Lifting

COMPLETED NA

Ridge Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Bone Blocks With Autogenous Tooth Graft

NCT05407363

Ridge Augmentation Implant Autogenous Tooth Graft

COMPLETED NA

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Height Gain With Dental Implant Placed Simultaneously With Closed Sinus Lifting Using Hydraulic Lift Technique Versus Summers' Osteotome Technique in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla (RCT)

NCT04648514

Evaluations, Diagnostic Self

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main prerequisite of achieving proper implant placement with ideal functional and proper restoration particularly in the posterior maxilla may compromise with violation to Schneiderian membrane especially in pneumatized maxillary Antrum when RBH \< 4 mm, Conventional lateral sinus floor elevation (CLSFE) is one of the most common surgical techniques used for increasing the available bone volume to place implants and restore function and esthetics in severe atrophic maxilla.

The objective of this study was to evaluate sinus elevation with simultaneous implant placement using open technique and bone ring versus sticky bone clinically and radiographically in terms of secondary stability and bone gain around the implant

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Graft

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomization clinical trial

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

This trial is considered a randomized double blind clinical trial due to the following:

1. The participant will be blinded to the technique that will be used during the surgical operation.
2. The outcome assessor will be blinded
3. The operator (DR.O.S.) will not be blinded for both techniques during the surgical operation, as the two techniques are different. (Dr. M.O.).

The purpose of double blinding procedure is to reduce assessment bias and to increase accuracy and objectivity of clinical outcomes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I: autogenous bone rings

sinus lifting was augmented by bone rings were harvested from chin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bone ring with open sinus lifting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients involved in this study will be divided in to two group each group will receive a different technique of sinus lifting use autogenous bone ring technique with study group and autogenous sticky bone with control group.

GroupII : autogenous sticky bone

sinus lifting was augmented by autogenous sticky bone was harvested from chin and immediate implant placement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bone ring with open sinus lifting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients involved in this study will be divided in to two group each group will receive a different technique of sinus lifting use autogenous bone ring technique with study group and autogenous sticky bone with control group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bone ring with open sinus lifting

All patients involved in this study will be divided in to two group each group will receive a different technique of sinus lifting use autogenous bone ring technique with study group and autogenous sticky bone with control group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sticky bone with open sinus lifting simultaneous implant

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with edentulous vertically deficient posterior maxillary ridge a 4-5 mm. height of alveolar bone.
* Both males as well as females without any active periodontal disease.
* All patients are in a good health with no systemic, immunologic or debilitating diseases that could affect normal bone healing.
* All selected patients are non-smokers and non-alcoholics.
* Patients are free from T.M.J troubles, abnormal oral habits such as bruxism.
* The edentulous ridges are covered with optimal thickness of mucoperiosteum with no signs of inflammation, ulceration or scar tissue.
* Remaining natural teeth have good periodontal tissue support and occlusion showed sufficient inter arch space for future prosthesis.

Exclusion Criteria

* On the local level, patients with maxillary sinus diseases, former sinus surgery and unfavorable inter maxillary relationship will be excluded.
* General contraindications to implant surgery.
* Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
* Untreated periodontitis.
* Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Substance abuse.
* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
* Severe bruxism or clenching.
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
* Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
* Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement.
* Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
* Need of bone augmentation procedures at implant placement.
* Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling.
* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.
* Referred only for implant placement or unable to attend a 5-year follow-up.

Minimum Eligible Age

26 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes