BURT Efficacy in Improving Upper Extremity Strength and Function During Post-stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT05401799
Last Updated: 2025-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2025-02-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this prospective study, the investigators will determine if a standardized BURT Upper Extremity (UE) program can be consistently implemented within an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). In addition, the investigators will see if patients who receive BURT have improved UE mobility and function as a result. The investigators will also study the perceived enjoyment and value of the intervention by patients, and perceived value by therapists.
Because BURT therapy is able to provide more repetitions of upper extremity movement in a shorter length of time than conventional therapy, the investigators hypothesize that patients who participate in neuro re-education activities using BURT will achieve greater improvements in strength, upper extremity function, fine motor coordination, activities of daily living and mobility during their time in an IRF than patients receiving conventional therapy.
In this study, eligible patients admitted to Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital (SRH) for rehabilitation following stroke will be randomized to receive conventional or BURT therapy. Meaningful clinical benchmarks for upper extremity function, tone, fine motor coordination, activities of daily living and mobility will be assessed using the Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale (UE-MAS)(Zelter, 2010), manual muscle testing (MMT), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) (Figueiredo, 2011) and the 9-hole peg test (9HPT)(Figueiredo, 2011). The investigators also hypothesize that patients in the BURT cohort will report greater value/usefulness and interest/enjoyment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Upper Extremity Rehabilitation With the BURT Robotic Arm
NCT03965403
BurtVision™ for Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Survivors:
NCT04940403
PostureCheck: A Vision-based Compensatory-posture-detection Tool for Robot-assisted Upper-limb Therapy
NCT04851886
Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients
NCT00372411
Robotic Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patient
NCT00037934
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Upper Extremity Neuroeducation
74 patients will receive the standard occupational therapy sessions that they would normally receive during their IRF stay. UE neuroeducation sessions are typically focused on improving strength and mobility of the upper arm. Clinicians will not be given instructions on how to run their sessions, however they will not be allowed to use BURT. Other devices that would normally be used during neuro-educational sessions (including X-cite, electrical stimulation and RT-300) will be allowed for use in this group. The therapists will track the activity, level of assistance and time provided in a tracking sheet, as well as document any adverse events that may occur
Other Occupational Therapy
Standard occupational therapy sessions will be 60-90 minutes a day and are UE neuroeducation sessions are typically focused on improving strength and mobility of the hemipelagic arm.
BURT Upper Extremity
As part of routine therapy, 74 patients will receive up to 5 sessions per week of BURT UE therapy in place of conventional neuro re-education. Patients in this arm of the study will receive any conventional therapy during the remainder of their treatment sessions. When using BURT, therapists will track the activity, level of assistance and time provided in a tracking sheet, as well as document any adverse events that may occur.
BURT
Use of Barrett Upper extremity Robot (BURT) to improve strength and mobility of hemiplegic upper extremity.
Other Occupational Therapy
Standard occupational therapy sessions will be 60-90 minutes a day and are UE neuroeducation sessions are typically focused on improving strength and mobility of the hemipelagic arm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BURT
Use of Barrett Upper extremity Robot (BURT) to improve strength and mobility of hemiplegic upper extremity.
Other Occupational Therapy
Standard occupational therapy sessions will be 60-90 minutes a day and are UE neuroeducation sessions are typically focused on improving strength and mobility of the hemipelagic arm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \>/= 18 years
* Unilateral stroke
* UE paresis affected arm with 3-/5 or less manual muscle testing throughout
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe Neglect
* Bilateral stroke
* Prior stroke with residual deficits
* Patients receiving prism adaptation treatment
* Comorbid neurological disorders
* Upper limb comorbidities that could limit functional improvement (UE arthritis pain, UE fracture, fixed contracture not allowing for proper device alignment)
* Severe shoulder subluxation that cannot be accommodated by the device
* Severe osteoporosis
* Unable to follow simple directions
* Unable to tolerate sitting 30 minutes
* Expected length of stay (LOS) \< 15 days.
18 Years
115 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gaylord Hospital
UNKNOWN
Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Casey Cowan
Occupational Therapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Casey Cowan, MS OTR/L
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital
Emily Steenburgh, MS OTR/L
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gaylord Hospital
Wallingford, Connecticut, United States
Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital
Schenectady, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barrett_Medical. Robotic Assist Rehabilitation Made Easy. https://medical.barrett.com/
Zelter L. 2010. Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). https://strokengine.ca/en/assessments/motor-assessment-scale-mas/#:~:text=The%20Motor%20Assessment%20Scale%20(MAS,leakage%20from%20a%20blood%20vessel.
Figueiredo S ZL. 2011. Modified Ashworth Scale. https://strokengine.ca/en/assessments/modified-ashworth-scale/
Figueiredo S. 2011. Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). https://strokengine.ca/en/assessments/nine-hole-peg-test-nhpt/
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-0324-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.