Psychological Well-being and Burnout in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Pandemic
NCT ID: NCT05394051
Last Updated: 2024-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
555 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2023-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
COVID-19 : Stress Within Hospital Workers
NCT05037214
RECHARGE: A Brief Psychological Intervention to Build Resilience in Healthcare Workers During COVID-19
NCT04531774
Effects of Mindfulness Training on Burnout and Mood in Hospital Employees
NCT04307563
Health cAre woRkers exposeD to COVID-19
NCT04570202
Burnout, Stress and Coping Strategies: Impact of the Covid-19 Epidemic
NCT04834882
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Assess the psychological well-being (depression, anxiety, positive affect, meaning and purpose) and burnout in an existing cohort of 3,569 HCWs working at Northwestern Medicine (NM) during the COVID-19 pandemic using self-report questionnaires.
Hypothesis 1: Higher burnout scores and evidence of poor psychological well-being (high depression, and anxiety and low positive affect and meaning and purpose) will be observed in patient-facing HCWs than in administrators.
Aim 2: Explore the associations of psychological well-being and burnout scores with health and cardio-metabolic behaviors (i.e., sleep, physical activity) and health-related absenteeism.
Hypothesis 2: Higher levels of emotional well-being will be associated with healthy behaviors.
Aim 3: Evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the evidence-based Positive Affect Regulation sKills (PARK) intervention to improve psychological well-being and reduce burnout among HCWs in a randomized control trial (RCT) with a wait list control.
Hypothesis 3.1: Participants will find PARK acceptable and feasible.
Hypothesis 3.2: Compared to control participants, those who have access to the PARK intervention will show improvements in psychological well-being and burnout.
Long-term impact: Our study will provide the foundation for a future randomized trial to determine the effect of PARK on psychological well-being, burnout, and downstream health behaviors and health outcomes among HCWs coping with significant stress. The results of this study may be used to implement programs like PARK to strengthen the health care delivery system and provide needed support to HCWs as they continue to respond to this pandemic and prepare for future shocks to the healthcare system in Chicago and across the US.
b. Significance and contribution
Psychological stress and burnout are an ongoing significant threat to HCW well-being and to the health systems ability to continue to both respond to the pandemic and deliver quality, people centered care. Stress and burnout among HCWs have been linked to diminished quality of patient care, including lower patient satisfaction with care and increased likelihood of medical errors and adverse health behaviors in HCWs. Stress is the perception that the demands of a situation outweigh resources for coping with those demands. When stress is ongoing, as it has been during the pandemic, it can lead to burnout. The construct of burnout, developed in studies of human-services workers, is characterized by emotional exhaustion (feeling emotionally drained by contact with patients), depersonalization (extreme detachment from patients), and lack of personal accomplishment (feelings of incompetence and lack of job success).
This challenge of HCW stress and burnout preexisted the COVID-19 pandemic. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) study found that over half of primary care physicians felt stressed because of time pressures and other work conditions. In a 2015 survey, the AMA (American Medical Association) estimated rates of burnout at 40% among physicians in the US. The presence of stress and burnout has been further intensified by COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the health care workforce in the United States (US), where there have been 567,599 cases and 1,821 deaths from COVID-19 in HCWs as of October 1, 2021. For frontline caregivers, who have witnessed an even larger number of deaths in the US and around the world, the psychological toll of the pandemic has been substantial. During the first year of the pandemic, 30-63% of HCWs reported stress depending on the setting, with the highest rates among nurses. In fact, a Society of Critical Care Medicine survey found that self-reported stress scores nearly tripled during the COVID-19 pandemic and included high rates in the 3 main areas of burnout (chronic exhaustion, cynicism and perceived ineffectiveness). Of course HCWs simultaneously faced other life stressors related to the pandemic, such as family and other caregiver responsibilities (e.g. illness and death in their own networks, economic strains) as well as fear of transmission to their family and friends due to workplace exposures. This dual toll of workplace and household stressors has resulted in increased rates of burnout, resulting in absenteeism and loss of people from the health care field when they are needed most.
The challenges of stress and burnout need to be addressed for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond to address the current crisis and ready the workforce for the next health system shock by broader system changes around work practices (that go beyond this project) but also by increasing individual resiliency through positive affect wellness interventions. We propose to study the levels of stress and burnout and associations with health behaviors and health-related absenteeism in an existing longitudinal cohort of 3,569 NM HCWs comprised of frontline providers and support and administrative staff. We will also test the acceptability, feasibility, uptake and early effectiveness of an adapted on-line evidence-based intervention (PARK) to improve psychological wellbeing and levels of job burnout among this group. PARK was adapted by Dr. Moskowitz from a previously validated wellness intervention found to improve depression, positive emotion, and other aspects of psychological well-being across a range of populations, but not HCWs. Results from this study will: 1) document psychological well-being, health and cardio-metabolic behaviors, and absenteeism in the entire cohort; 2) assess the feasibility of an intervention, previously shown to be efficacious in other populations; and 3) explore the effectiveness of the intervention by comparing psychological well-being and burnout in those assigned to the intervention compared to those in a waitlist control condition. We expect that PARK will improve overall stress, burnout, and well-being in NM HCWs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PARK Now
6-Week Self-Guided Program: PARK Positive Emotion Skills: The skills will be delivered over approximately 6 weeks, and individuals can participate from any device and location with internet access. A week will consist of 1-2 days of didactic material and 5-6 days of real-life skills practice and reporting. The maximum amount of time engaged in the PARK program for any participant is 5 hours over the 6-week period, plus completion of the REDCap surveys assessments (burnout, well-being, health behaviors). The intervention will focus on developing the following skills that will be supplemented by home practice: (1) positive events, capitalizing, gratitude; (2) mindfulness; (3) positive reappraisal; (4) personal strength and achievable goals; (5) and self-compassion.
PARK is delivered through the BrightOutcome online platform.
Positive Affect Regulation sKills (PARK)
The goal of the PARK program is to reduce feelings of anxiety, depression, and social isolation, as well as increase well-being and a sense of meaning and purpose through the practice of positive emotion skills via a self-guided online platform.
The total time involved from the beginning to the end of the intervention portion of the study is approximately 6 months (includes 6-week PARK course, baseline and follow-up assessments. Wait list controls will be assessed at similar time intervals and will be offered PARK at end of follow-up.
Wait List Control-PARK Later
Wait list controls will be assessed at similar time intervals and will be offered PARK at end of follow-up.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Positive Affect Regulation sKills (PARK)
The goal of the PARK program is to reduce feelings of anxiety, depression, and social isolation, as well as increase well-being and a sense of meaning and purpose through the practice of positive emotion skills via a self-guided online platform.
The total time involved from the beginning to the end of the intervention portion of the study is approximately 6 months (includes 6-week PARK course, baseline and follow-up assessments. Wait list controls will be assessed at similar time intervals and will be offered PARK at end of follow-up.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants will be eligible if they are a participant in the NM HCW Serology Study and they provide electronic informed consent to participate.
* Pregnant women and all employees of Northwestern Medicine are eligible for study.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Charlesnika Evans
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlesnika Evans, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Valdivia N, Hirschhorn LR, Vu TH, Dubois C, Moskowitz JT, Wilkins JT, Evans CT. Utilization of at-home tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Chicago. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 24;4(1):e58. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.17. eCollection 2024.
Wilkins JT, Hirschhorn LR, Gray EL, Wallia A, Carnethon M, Zembower TR, Ho J, DeYoung BJ, Zhu A, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Taiwo B, Evans CT. Serologic Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection over 6 Months of Follow Up in Healthcare Workers in Chicago: A Cohort Study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.367. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
Wilkins JT, Gray EL, Wallia A, Hirschhorn LR, Zembower TR, Ho J, Kalume N, Agbo O, Zhu A, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Khan SS, Carnethon M, Huffman M, Evans CT. Seroprevalence and Correlates of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Health Care Workers in Chicago. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 9;8(1):ofaa582. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa582. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Evans CT, DeYoung BJ, Gray EL, Wallia A, Ho J, Carnethon M, Zembower TR, Hirschhorn LR, Wilkins JT. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine intentions and uptake in a tertiary-care healthcare system: A longitudinal study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;43(12):1806-1812. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.523. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
Stone TD, Lee C, Bannon J, Vu TT, Hirschhorn LR, Wilkins JT, Evans CT. Intentions for uptake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine booster in healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):690-692. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.307. Epub 2023 Mar 13. No abstract available.
Moskowitz JT, Jackson KL, Cummings P, Addington EL, Freedman ME, Bannon J, Lee C, Vu TH, Wallia A, Hirschhorn LR, Wilkins JT, Evans C. Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a positive emotion regulation intervention to promote resilience for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0305172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305172. eCollection 2024.
Bannon J, Evans CT, Freedman M, Lee C, Vu TH, Wallia A, Wilkins JT, Moskowitz JT, Hirschhorn LR. Psychological wellbeing and the association with burnout in a cohort of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Health Serv. 2022 Oct 25;2:994474. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.994474. eCollection 2022.
Lee C, Vu TT, Fuller JA, Freedman M, Bannon J, Wilkins JT, Moskowitz JT, Hirschhorn LR, Wallia A, Evans CT. The association of burnout with work absenteeism and the frequency of thoughts in leaving their job in a cohort of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Health Serv. 2023 Nov 29;3:1272285. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1272285. eCollection 2023.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00212515
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.