Complications and Adverse Events in Lymphadenectomy in the Inguinal Area

NCT ID: NCT05388786

Last Updated: 2023-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to create an effective and accurate method to report, define, and classify complications and adverse events during and after Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) as part of the staging and treatment for penile cancer, vulvar cancer, and melanoma. In turn, this will become an objective, efficient, and reproducible tool to facilitate comparisons across surgical approaches, techniques, and surgeons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) has shown to be a necessary surgery from the oncology standpoint being extensively used as part of the staging process in malignancies of the penis, vulva, or melanoma. Moreover, the ILND has been shown to improve survival if performed in a timely manner. Yet, ILND is linked to a high rate of complications and adverse events.

Complications and adverse events' incidence are frequently used as surrogate markers of quality in surgery. However, there is tremendous heterogeneity in the report in such specifically for this procedure. Even though different classification and grading systems on surgical complications are available. There is a lack of standardization regarding the definition and classification to report ILND complications and adverse events leading to discrepancies across the literature, often interfering with the interpretation of surgical performance and quality.

This study will provide a systematic definition and classification of ILND complications and adverse events, ultimately improving the reporting of such conditions for future studies.

To create an effective and accurate method to report, define, and classify complications and adverse events during and after ILND as part of the staging and treatment for penile cancer, vulvar cancer, and melanoma. In turn, this will become an objective, efficient, and reproducible tool to facilitate comparisons across surgical approaches, techniques, and surgeons.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Consensus Development

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Delphi Panel

A team of experts in open inguinal lymphadenectomy, video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL), and robotic-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (R-VEIL) in the fields of General Surgery, Gynecology Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Urology will be invited to participate. These experts are identified according to surgical experience, research, and academic interest.

Delphi Questionnaire

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

An invitation email, including a link to the survey, will be sent to the panel of experts in ILND for penile cancer, vulvar cancer, and melanoma.

The Delphi questionnaire will be administered via Welphi.com. In the first survey, panel members will outline the ILND complications and adverse events definition and classification with a series of 5-point Likert scale assessments and options for free-text responses relating to the surgeon's perception.

The experts will fill out the online questionnaire. For the questions that do not reach a consensus of more than 80% in the first round or need further explanation, additional rounds of the survey may be performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Delphi Questionnaire

An invitation email, including a link to the survey, will be sent to the panel of experts in ILND for penile cancer, vulvar cancer, and melanoma.

The Delphi questionnaire will be administered via Welphi.com. In the first survey, panel members will outline the ILND complications and adverse events definition and classification with a series of 5-point Likert scale assessments and options for free-text responses relating to the surgeon's perception.

The experts will fill out the online questionnaire. For the questions that do not reach a consensus of more than 80% in the first round or need further explanation, additional rounds of the survey may be performed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Experts in open inguinal lymphadenectomy
* Experts in video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL)
* Experts in robotic video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (R-VEIL)
* Authors with at least one publication in ILND for penile cancer, vulvar cancer, or melanoma

Exclusion Criteria

* Panelists who were not able to commit to all rounds of the modified Delphi process will be excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rene Sotelo

Professor of Clinical Urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rene Sotelo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California

Giovanni Cacciamani, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern California

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chipollini J, Tang DH, Gilbert SM, Poch MA, Pow-Sang JM, Sexton WJ, Spiess PE. Delay to Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Greater than 3 Months Predicts Poorer Recurrence-Free Survival for Patients with Penile Cancer. J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1346-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.076. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28652123 (View on PubMed)

Gkegkes ID, Minis EE, Iavazzo C. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4. Epub 2018 May 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29730734 (View on PubMed)

Munoz Guillermo V, Rosino Sanchez A, Rivero Guerra A, Barcelo Bayonas I, Pardo Martinez A, Jimenez Peralta D, Carrillo George C, Pietricica BN, Izquierdo Morejon E, Cruces de Abia FI, Romero Hoyuela A, Hita Villaplana G, Fernandez Aparicio T. [Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Systematic review.]. Arch Esp Urol. 2019 Dec;72(10):992-999. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31823847 (View on PubMed)

Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M; European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22074761 (View on PubMed)

Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):939-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9584-y. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18414942 (View on PubMed)

Nabavizadeh R, Petrinec B, Necchi A, Tsaur I, Albersen M, Master V. Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 3;9(8):2501. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082501.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32756502 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UP-22-00368

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT06514859 RECRUITING NA