A Study for Lymphocele and Lymphorrhea Control Following Inguinal and Axillary Radical Lymph Node Dissection

NCT ID: NCT02476357

Last Updated: 2020-08-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients undergoing groin or axillary Radical lymph node dissection (RLND) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND, after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma or breast cancer were randomized in a controlled trial for surgical dissection technique. Harmonic scalpel dissection were compared with classic dissection in term of lymphocoele and oedema.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the present study was to assess the value of USS in RLND in groin and axilla in a homogenous group of patients.

In a tertiary academic centre, patients undergoing groin or axillary RLND or CLND after positive SLNB for melanoma, skin cancer, sarcoma or breast cancer were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial for surgical dissection technique. The study was reviewed and accepted by the local ethical committee. Patients were older than 18 years and gave an informed consent. All patients with a past medical history of contralateral lymph node dissection or other cause of lymphedema (previous trauma, deep venous thrombosis, radiotherapy, etc.) were excluded. Patients undergoing both iliac and inguinal lymph node dissections were excluded as well. No patients had distant or in transit metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned using sealed numbered envelopes to one of two arms of the study in a 1: 1 ratio. In the first group the dissection was conducted with USS (Harmonic Focus ®, Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH) exclusively. In the control group the lymphadenectomy was performed using ligation and monopolar electrocautery. All patients were operated by a dedicated team headed by a single surgeon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymph Node Dissection Lymphoedema Lymphocoele

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Monocentric, open, interventional, randomized with two arms 1:1
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
unblinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Harmonic

Harmonic Scalpel (HS; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Harmonic scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control

Monopolar scalpel and ligature

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Harmonic scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Harmonic scalpel

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients undergoing groin or axillary Radical lymph node dissection (RLND) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND), after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma or breast cancer were included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with a past medical history of contralateral lymph node dissection or other cause for lymphedema (trauma, deep venous thrombosis, radiotherapy, etc.) were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Lausanne Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolas DEMARTINES

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maurice Matter, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Lausanne Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Center

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gie O, Matthey-Gie ML, Marques-Vidal PM, Demartines N, Matter M. Impact of the Ultrasonic scalpel on the amount of drained lymph after axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy. BMC Surg. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0222-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28327108 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LYMPH-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.