Survivorship of Decompression Alone Vs Decomp With Fusion in DLS and LCS
NCT ID: NCT05386381
Last Updated: 2022-05-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-06
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study aims to determine if decompression alone performs better or worse in the long term than decompression with fusion in a large cohort of patients who have DLS with LCS. It also aims to determine if the decompression technique of midline-sparing fenestration or spinous process osteotomy make a difference to survival in cases of DLS with LCS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of Imaging and Endoplant-related Mechanical Complications After Long Segment Fixation and Fusion of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis (DLS)
NCT04960423
Short-term Clinical Outcome of Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared With the Traditional "Open" and Minimal Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT05538416
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981
Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02290314
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01921530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All data collected will be anonymized prior to any analysis. The primary outcome to be analyzed is the time to repeat surgery/procedure at the previously operated vertebral level. This will be regarded as failure of the original surgery and will be used in the survival analysis. All analysis will be done at the RJAH site. As the study will use anonymized data collected through the clinical service, individual patient consent will not be obtained.
All data used in this study has been obtained during the patients' routine clinical care and follow up. No further tests or scans other than routine patient care will be performed. The data for this study will be collected and anonymized before any statistics is performed. Only data for patients with DLS + LCS treated operatively between 1st January 2002 and 31st December 2006 that have had at least 15 years of follow up will be extracted. The data is currently stored on the Trust secure patient record system. As all the data will be anonymized no consents will be required. Data collected will include age, gender, date of admission, consultant, primary procedure date, length of hospital stay, date of death, type of surgery (fenestration/fenestration+fusion/spinous process osteotomy), fusion/no fusion, type of fusion (instrumented/non-instrumented/interbody), unilateral/bilateral, laminectomy/no laminectomy, number of levels, discectomy, post op complications, revision surgery, date of revision, coexisting problems.
Analysis of the data will address the following: Does difference in technique of lumbar decompression or adding fusion affect long term survivorship in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with canal stenosis (DLS +LCS)? Does decompression alone perform better or worse in the long term than decompression with fusion in a large cohort of patients who have DLS with LCS. Does decompression technique of midline-sparing fenestration or spinous process osteotomy make a difference to survival in cases of DLS with LCS
Statistics The primary outcome which is the time to failure will be used to generate the Kaplan-Meier survival function for each of the three surgical techniques. The survival curves will then be compared using the Mantel-Cox (Log rank) test for statistical significance. Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05. A sub group analysis will be performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Decompression alone
Patients undergone decompression surgery alone
No interventions assigned to this group
Decompression with fusion
Patient undergone decompression and lumbar fusion surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
olakunle J Alonge, MBBS, FWACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS FT
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopedic Hospital
Oswestry, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RL1854
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.