Survivorship of Decompression Alone Vs Decomp With Fusion in DLS and LCS

NCT ID: NCT05386381

Last Updated: 2022-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-06

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There has been a long-standing controversy on the operative treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis (DLS) with Lumbar Canal Stenosis (LCS), especially whether the addition of fusion to decompression is necessary. Many believe that decompression alone (D) by either using midline preserving fenestration techniques (fenestration by laminotomy and medial facetectomy) or with a spinous process osteotomy (SPO) is enough for treatment of patients with DLS while others believe that a fusion (D+F) should be added in all cases.

The study aims to determine if decompression alone performs better or worse in the long term than decompression with fusion in a large cohort of patients who have DLS with LCS. It also aims to determine if the decompression technique of midline-sparing fenestration or spinous process osteotomy make a difference to survival in cases of DLS with LCS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study aims to utilize already obtained data from the clinical service, obtainable from the electronic patient records (EPR). It would be a retrospective review of data on patients with DLS treated operatively.

All data collected will be anonymized prior to any analysis. The primary outcome to be analyzed is the time to repeat surgery/procedure at the previously operated vertebral level. This will be regarded as failure of the original surgery and will be used in the survival analysis. All analysis will be done at the RJAH site. As the study will use anonymized data collected through the clinical service, individual patient consent will not be obtained.

All data used in this study has been obtained during the patients' routine clinical care and follow up. No further tests or scans other than routine patient care will be performed. The data for this study will be collected and anonymized before any statistics is performed. Only data for patients with DLS + LCS treated operatively between 1st January 2002 and 31st December 2006 that have had at least 15 years of follow up will be extracted. The data is currently stored on the Trust secure patient record system. As all the data will be anonymized no consents will be required. Data collected will include age, gender, date of admission, consultant, primary procedure date, length of hospital stay, date of death, type of surgery (fenestration/fenestration+fusion/spinous process osteotomy), fusion/no fusion, type of fusion (instrumented/non-instrumented/interbody), unilateral/bilateral, laminectomy/no laminectomy, number of levels, discectomy, post op complications, revision surgery, date of revision, coexisting problems.

Analysis of the data will address the following: Does difference in technique of lumbar decompression or adding fusion affect long term survivorship in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with canal stenosis (DLS +LCS)? Does decompression alone perform better or worse in the long term than decompression with fusion in a large cohort of patients who have DLS with LCS. Does decompression technique of midline-sparing fenestration or spinous process osteotomy make a difference to survival in cases of DLS with LCS

Statistics The primary outcome which is the time to failure will be used to generate the Kaplan-Meier survival function for each of the three surgical techniques. The survival curves will then be compared using the Mantel-Cox (Log rank) test for statistical significance. Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05. A sub group analysis will be performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Involving L4-L5

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decompression alone

Patients undergone decompression surgery alone

No interventions assigned to this group

Decompression with fusion

Patient undergone decompression and lumbar fusion surgery

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with spondylolysis
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

olakunle J Alonge, MBBS, FWACS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS FT

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopedic Hospital

Oswestry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RL1854

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.