Neurophysiologic Assessment of ET Patients Treated by Vim DBS

NCT ID: NCT05362448

Last Updated: 2022-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-23

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Essential tremor is a chronic and progressive neurological disease characterized by upper limb tremor. This is one of the most frequent movement disorders. Most of the time the disease worsens over the time, affecting patients' work abilities and in the most severe cases activities of daily living such as eating or dressing. For the most disabled patients, Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate median nucleus (Vim), a procedure consisting in an electrode implantation in a structure of the brain involved in tremor genesis, is the gold standard treatment. While this therapy is most of the time highly effective in alleviating the tremor, some subjects may exhibit gait impairment or upper limb coordination troubles years after the surgery, which are thought to be due to the involuntary stimulation of efferent cerebellar fiber tract. Unfortunately, this DBS induced side effect cannot be systematically avoided and may limit the possibilities of settings adaptation required to control the tremor. Surprisingly, while it could be a valuable therapeutic option for these patients suffering from DBS induced balance troubles, little is known about the effect of varying the rate of stimulation on the gait disorders associated with essential tremor and Vim DBS. The aim of or study is consequently to assess the effect of different frequency of stimulation on tremor, gait and balance disorders as well as on eye movements in patients uni or bilaterally stimulated in the Vim for a severe and medically intractable essential tremor. Patients followed at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (University College London Hospital) will be included. To better characterize the different symptoms, the investigators will use ataxia and tremor rating scale together with 3D gait motion analysis, oculography and computerized spiral test analysis. Our findings might lead to a better understanding of Vim-DBS associated gait disorders in essential tremor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease characterized by a symmetrical 4-12 Hz kinetic tremor constantly affecting hands and arms. The tremor can also involve the neck, the lower limb, the voice, the mouth, the tongue or other body regions. ET is among the most frequent movement disorders, with an estimated prevalence of 0,9% of the global population. While the tremor can be mildly disabling at the beginning of the disease, most patients experience a worsening of their tremor over the time. Eventually, disease progression can lead to severe disability, impacting patients' working abilities and in the most severe cases, activity of daily living. Though ET being a frequent debilitating condition, there are still few therapeutic options for the most disabled patients. Several surgical procedures have been evaluated in ET including Deep brain Stimulation (DBS) of Thalamic Ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) or within the posterior subthalamic area, surgical thalamotomy, Gamma knife or, more recently, MRI guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy. While Gamma knife and focused ultrasound thalamotomy may be safer due to the absence of craniotomy, Vim-DBS remains currently the reference treatment and the most used procedure for medically refractory ET.

Besides the early side effects of Vim-DBS such as haemorrhagic, ischemic and infectious complications occurring immediately after the electrodes implantation procedure, late side-effects such as cerebellar symptoms including gait or upper limb cerebellar ataxia, paraesthesia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and cognitive difficulties are quite frequent. These long-term consequences of the stimulation may dramatically impact the quality of life of patients suffering from ET years after the surgery and mitigate the benefits of this intervention. Considering gait ataxia, it has been reported that this complication may affect up to 37% of ET patients following Vim-DBS surgery and seem to occur more frequently in patient who had pre-operative gait impairment, greater disease severity, older age and when DBS was performed bilaterally. Upper limb ataxia is also common and characterized by the occurrence or the paradoxical worsening of an intention tremor together with asynergy, dyschronometria and dysdiadochokinesia. It has been shown that this latter can be induced by suprathreshold stimulation.

One of the major assets of Vim-DBS over surgical thalamotomy remain its ability to steadily adapt the current delivered by the electrodes by changing the stimulation parameters. Using traditional Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG), it is possible to modify the stimulation mode (monopolar or bipolar stimulation), amplitude, frequency and pulse width as well as to modify the contacts of the electrodes delivering the current. However, despite DBS being a treatment largely available worldwide as well as being part of the routine care for medically refractory tremor, only few studies have assessed the effects of varying DBS settings on cerebellar symptoms presented by patients suffering from ET and stimulated within the Vim. It has been reported that tremor responds best to amplitude, which is usually increased until a complete resolution of the tremor is obtained. Increasing the stimulation pulse width produces a similar clinical effect and may help to alleviate tremor. Interestingly, it has recently been shown that decreasing the pulse width may improve the gait disorders, widen the therapeutic window and diminishes DBS induced side effects. This clinical finding is supported by the recent dissection of the neuronal network underlying Vim DBS clinical response which suggest that tremor suppression could be due to dentato-rubro-thalamic tract stimulation while gait and limb ataxia could be promoted by the stimulation of the cerebello-rubro-spinal and the rubro-olivo-cerebellar tract meaning the possibility of correcting these side effects by accurately optimizing the DBS parameters.

Among the clinical effect of the different types of parameters, the stimulation frequency has certainly been the less extensively studied in ET. This is at first sight quite surprising given that decreasing the frequency of stimulation of the Subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a valuable therapeutic option in Parkinson's disease especially for patient presenting with dopa-refractory symptoms such as freezing of gait or speech impairment. Lower frequency stimulation has also shown to be beneficial for some patients suffering from dystonia, and it has been suggested that this sustained clinical improvement was obtained by avoiding the stimulation of the structure responsible of side effects.

In comparison, a very low number of studies has focused on the consequences of lower frequency stimulation on tremor. Noteworthy is the fact that most of them have pointed that the tremor suppression was better achieved for a frequency around 100 Hz, with little evidence for a small additional therapeutic effect for frequencies above 130 Hz. Conversely, frequency of 50 Hz or lower seems to not suppress tremor and could even worsen it or induce myoclonic jerks. Based on these clinical findings, it is currently admitted initiating the stimulation with a frequency of 130 Hz and increasing it up to 180 Hz if the therapeutic effect on tremor remains unsatisfying despite concomitant high amplitude and large pulse width. A recent small case series has interestingly shown that some patients presenting with balance disorder years after Vim DBS surgery were having their trouble improved when the stimulation frequency was decreased to 130 Hz. Additionally, there are some evidence that, similarly to short pulse width stimulation, decreasing the frequency up to 100 Hz may help to optimize postural or intention tremor and DBS side effects control by widening the therapeutic window. Taken together, these findings suggest that, similarly to shorter pulse width, a lower frequency of stimulation could be an interesting therapeutic approach for ET patients suffering from balance disorders or upper limb ataxia promoted by Vim-DBS. However, since all the above-mentioned studies were unblinded and non-randomized, the level of evidence supporting such a strategy remain weak. Additionally, none of these works has aimed at evaluating the effect of decreasing DBS frequency on gait and balance, neither by using clinical testing, nor by using quantitative measurement such as 3D motion analysis or computerized posture assessment.

For these reasons, the aim of the present study will be to study the effect of varying Vim-DBS frequency on cerebellar features including gait and upper limb ataxia in ET by using non-invasive quantitative physiological tools, namely computerized spiral test analysis, 3D infrared gait motion analysis, balance measure against force perturbation analysis and oculography.

Patients presenting an ET treated by Vim-DBS stimulation for more than 3 months, followed at the National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom will be included.

Regarding the procedure, the investigators will first assess the therapeutic window by estimating the therapeutic and side effect thresholds for three different frequencies (80 Hz-130 Hz-180 Hz). Additionally, the investigators will subsequently analyse balance and gait using a 3D motion analysis system, the tremor using a tablet coupled to a computerized spiral analysis software and eye movements using oculography for the three different settings and with the DBS turned off.

Eventually, the investigators will localize the position of the electrodes and model Volume of Tissue Activated using the DBS planning software Guide-XT® and the pre and postoperative brain MRI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Essential Tremor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

80 Hz

Stimulation with a frequency of 80 Hz

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

First, we will calculate for each patient and each frequency the amplitude therapeutic window (difference between therapeutic and side effect threshold). We will determine an optimal amplitude for each frequency that we will apply in the second part of the study.

130 Hz

Stimulation with a frequency of 130 Hz

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

First, we will calculate for each patient and each frequency the amplitude therapeutic window (difference between therapeutic and side effect threshold). We will determine an optimal amplitude for each frequency that we will apply in the second part of the study.

180 Hz

Stimulation with a frequency of 180 Hz

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

First, we will calculate for each patient and each frequency the amplitude therapeutic window (difference between therapeutic and side effect threshold). We will determine an optimal amplitude for each frequency that we will apply in the second part of the study.

DBS off

Absence of stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Frequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

First, we will calculate for each patient and each frequency the amplitude therapeutic window (difference between therapeutic and side effect threshold). We will determine an optimal amplitude for each frequency that we will apply in the second part of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Frequency

First, we will calculate for each patient and each frequency the amplitude therapeutic window (difference between therapeutic and side effect threshold). We will determine an optimal amplitude for each frequency that we will apply in the second part of the study.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 years
2. No gender specification
3. Patient suffering from severe medically intractable essential tremor and treated by Vim-DBS
4. Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Concurrent and/or recent involvement in other research that is likely to interfere with the intervention within the last 3 months before study enrolment
2. Patients presenting with other cause(s) of balance or gait disorders (stroke, concomitant neurological, rheumatological or orthopaedic disease, severe hypopallesthesia, visual impairment, neuromuscular or vestibular disorders)
3. Recently implanted patients (\<3 months)
4. Patients unable to provide written informed consent (patients presenting with psychiatric or cognitive disorders)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College London Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thomas Wirth

Clinical Research Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patricia Limousin, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

02034567890 ext. +44

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patricia Limousin, MD PhD

Role: primary

0203 448 8723 ext. +44

Thomas Wirth, MD MS

Role: backup

0203 448 8723 ext. +44

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

274481

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.