Evaluation of Gel and Solution of Chlorhexidine in Disinfection Root Canals of Primary Anterior Teeth.

NCT ID: NCT05361278

Last Updated: 2022-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-15

Study Completion Date

2022-02-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The process of removing bacteria and their products from the root canals is an essential step that is achieved through the combination of mechanical preparation and irrigation with chemicals. However, mechanical preparation alone can not reduce the microbial formations inside root canals, so at least about 35% of the root canal walls remain without the preparation tools reaching them.

Many irrigants were used to irrigate the root canals, as sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are the most famous. Although most studies have proven the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite with its different concentrations in accomplishing this task, some of them showed the inability of the irrigant fluid to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis inside the canals. These bacteria are highly resistant, and therefore endodontic treatment fails in the long term.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bacteria and their products play an essential role in the initiation and persistence of endodontic diseases. Therefore, eliminating them and preventing the return of their effectiveness is the desired goal in any successful endodontic treatment in the short and long term.

Due to the fact that mechanical preparation of the root canal alone is not capable of removing the entire bacterial content, chemical irrigants were considered necessary to reduce the number of bacteria and toxins resulting from them. Until now, there is no irrigant capable of removing the entire bacterial content from the root canal.

Despite the many advantages of sodium hypochlorite, several studies have revealed the toxicity of the solution in high concentrations of it, and it tends to cause tissue irritation when it comes into contact with the apical tissues.

Chlorhexidine has been used for a long time in dentistry due to its antibacterial properties, long period of effect, and relatively low toxicity. This has prompted its use as an irrigant and an intra-canal dressing in endodontic treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries Infection, Bacterial Tooth, Deciduous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chlorhexidine irrigation solution

CHx 2% solution will be used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorhexidine solution

Intervention Type OTHER

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation solution

CHx 2% solution will be used with ultrasonic activation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Activated chlorhexidine solution

Intervention Type OTHER

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Chlorhexidine irrigation gel

CHx 2% gel will be used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorhexidine gel

Intervention Type OTHER

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Activated chlorhexidine irrigation gel

CHx 2% gel will be used with ultrasonic activation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Activated chlorhexidine gel

Intervention Type OTHER

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution

NaOCl 5,25% solution will be used.

Group Type OTHER

Sodium hypochlorite solution

Intervention Type OTHER

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file.
* Irrigating the canal with 3 ml of 5% sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual of sodium hypochlorite.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chlorhexidine solution

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Activated chlorhexidine solution

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine solution.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Chlorhexidine gel

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Activated chlorhexidine gel

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 2% CHx gel between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the gel after using the last file with activation using an ultrasonic irrigation head.
* Irrigation with 3 ml of 0.5% Tween 80 and 0.07 % lecithin to remove residual chlorhexidine gel.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Sodium hypochlorite solution

* Irrigate the root canal with 1 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution between each file 1 mm from the apical foramen by using a 27-gauge irrigation needle.
* Irrigate the root canal with 3 ml of the solution after using the last file.
* Irrigating the canal with 3 ml of 5% sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual of sodium hypochlorite.
* Drying the canal with paper points (placing a 20 size paper point for 60 seconds in each canal) to take the bacterial smear.
* Follow-up of endodontic treatment procedures for the treated tooth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
2. Physiological root resorption no more than the apical third
3. Symptoms or signs of pulpal necrosis with or without radial lesions (swelling - fistua - abnormal movement).
4. At least 2 mm of bone surrounding the permanent bud.
5. Children who have not taken antibiotics in the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Systematic or mental disorders.
2. Definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
3. Existence external or internal abnormal absorption.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rahaf ِA kharsa, DDs

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus

Mohannad G Laflouf, Phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Pedodontics, Department of Pedodontics, University of Damascus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Damascus University

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goud S, Aravelli S, Dronamraju S, Cherukuri G, Morishetty P. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Aloe Vera, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, and 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3480.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30648031 (View on PubMed)

Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11556507 (View on PubMed)

Ruksakiet K, Hanak L, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Sadaeng W, Czumbel LM, Sang-Ngoen T, Garami A, Miko A, Varga G, Lohinai Z. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1032-1041.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32413440 (View on PubMed)

Walia V, Goswami M, Mishra S, Walia N, Sahay D. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite, the Diode Laser and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals - An In Vivo Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):268-274. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.44. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31875118 (View on PubMed)

Tirali RE, Bodur H, Ece G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride in elimination of microorganisms within dentinal tubules of primary and permanent teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e517-22. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17566.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22143724 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Pedo-02-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dental Implants and Mouth Rinse
NCT02002442 COMPLETED PHASE2