Optimizing Stroke Prophylaxis of Acute Atrial Fibrillation With an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool

NCT ID: NCT05341986

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-11

Study Completion Date

2026-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world, with significant morbidity and mortality. With appropriate oral anticoagulation, the risk of stroke due to atrial fibrillation decreases by 64%. Although atrial fibrillation is commonly diagnosed and treated in the Emergency Department (ED), oral anticoagulation is significantly underprescribed. Underprescribing has been attributed to a lack of empowerment and deferral of prescribing to longitudinal care clinicians.

Using a convergent parallel quantitative-qualitative design (mixed-methods), we propose a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design with the implementation of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in adults with new-onset AF that are OAC-naïve and at significant risk for stroke. In parallel, we will use qualitative approaches to evaluate clinician facilitators and barriers to tool utilization as well as patient satisfaction and engagement with the tool.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

AIM 1: Compare the magnitude of change of appropriate OAC prescribing over time at each ED with EHR-Based CDS tool implementation.

H1a. A CDS tool will increase the prescribing of OACs at ED discharge in patients with new AF.

H1b. The highly-integrated EHR-based CDS tool with a trigger will have a greater impact on the volume of prescribing compared to a less integrated web-based portal.

AIM 2: Evaluate clinician experiences with factors that influence the CDS tool implementation through a qualitative approach.

H2a. Clinicians will have high acceptability of the tool and be open to additional CDS tools.

H2b. Health system resources, such as the ability to refer patients to an anticoagulation clinic or primary care, will facilitate ED tool utilization.

AIM 3 (Exploratory): Determine patient satisfaction and engagement with ED visits across the three steps of CDS tool implementation and explore patient-clinician stories as mini-case studies (dyads) related to the recall of their experiences.

AIM 1 addresses whether a CDS tool can increase clinician prescribing-thereby improving long-term outcomes for patients. AIM 2 will address clinician facilitators and barriers to the CDS tool. AIM 3 (exploratory) will allow the exploration of a patient-centered approach for the future development of a scalable and generalizable strategy for large-scale dissemination. Through a convergent parallel quantitative-qualitative study, we will capitalize on a missed opportunity to change the trajectory of care and outcomes of newly ED-diagnosed AF patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Using a convergent parallel quantitative-qualitative design (mixed-methods), we propose a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design with the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support (CDS) tool in adults with new-onset AF that are OAC-naïve and at significant risk for stroke, in three ED settings with different practice patterns and culture, patient populations, and organizational readiness. In parallel, we will use qualitative approaches to evaluate clinician facilitators and barriers to tool utilization as well as patient satisfaction and engagement with the tool.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Link-Out

Clinicians will be trained on the web-based portal of the CDS tool and shown where the Link to the tool will be available in the EHR.

Group Type OTHER

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.

BPA + Link-out

Clinicians will be trained on how a BPA is triggered when a patient is diagnosed with AF. The alert will pop up within the EHR with the Link-out to the web portal.

Group Type OTHER

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.

BPA + FHIR

Instead of a link to the web-based portal, the BPA will contain a link to the FHIR-integrated CDS tool portal. FHIR will automatically pull EHR data about the patient into the CDS tool portal. Data include demographic information, comorbidities in the active problem list, past medical and surgical history, and social history. Clinicians will also receive training before the implementation of this step.

Group Type OTHER

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool

Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ICD-10 I48.0, I48.1, I48.9) during an ED visit with start dates between 1/11/2022 and 12/31/2025 within the patient's age \>18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Valvular disease, pregnancy, large esophageal varices, thrombocytopenia, severe or uncontrolled bleeding, severe liver or kidney disease, major surgery within 72 hours; OR
* Recent brain, eye or spinal cord injury or surgery; OR
* ED stroke, death or hospitalization at index visit; OR
* Patient transferred from another hospital (to ensure availability of index ED visit data); OR
* Left against medical advice; OR
* Evidence of non-OAC naïve patient:

* OAC prescribed in the prior 3mo to index ED visit; OR
* Being managed by an anticoagulation clinic (ACC);
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bory Kea

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bory Kea, MD, MCR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00022471

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.