Optimizing Stroke Prophylaxis of Acute Atrial Fibrillation With an Electronic Clinical Decision Support Tool
NCT ID: NCT05341986
Last Updated: 2025-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-11
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Using a convergent parallel quantitative-qualitative design (mixed-methods), we propose a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design with the implementation of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in adults with new-onset AF that are OAC-naïve and at significant risk for stroke. In parallel, we will use qualitative approaches to evaluate clinician facilitators and barriers to tool utilization as well as patient satisfaction and engagement with the tool.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02635685
Impact of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) on Thromboprophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02524977
IMplementation of an RCT to imProve Treatment With Oral AntiCoagulanTs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03259373
Computerized Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation
NCT06355986
Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial in Acute STROKE
NCT05293080
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AIM 1: Compare the magnitude of change of appropriate OAC prescribing over time at each ED with EHR-Based CDS tool implementation.
H1a. A CDS tool will increase the prescribing of OACs at ED discharge in patients with new AF.
H1b. The highly-integrated EHR-based CDS tool with a trigger will have a greater impact on the volume of prescribing compared to a less integrated web-based portal.
AIM 2: Evaluate clinician experiences with factors that influence the CDS tool implementation through a qualitative approach.
H2a. Clinicians will have high acceptability of the tool and be open to additional CDS tools.
H2b. Health system resources, such as the ability to refer patients to an anticoagulation clinic or primary care, will facilitate ED tool utilization.
AIM 3 (Exploratory): Determine patient satisfaction and engagement with ED visits across the three steps of CDS tool implementation and explore patient-clinician stories as mini-case studies (dyads) related to the recall of their experiences.
AIM 1 addresses whether a CDS tool can increase clinician prescribing-thereby improving long-term outcomes for patients. AIM 2 will address clinician facilitators and barriers to the CDS tool. AIM 3 (exploratory) will allow the exploration of a patient-centered approach for the future development of a scalable and generalizable strategy for large-scale dissemination. Through a convergent parallel quantitative-qualitative study, we will capitalize on a missed opportunity to change the trajectory of care and outcomes of newly ED-diagnosed AF patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Link-Out
Clinicians will be trained on the web-based portal of the CDS tool and shown where the Link to the tool will be available in the EHR.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool
Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.
BPA + Link-out
Clinicians will be trained on how a BPA is triggered when a patient is diagnosed with AF. The alert will pop up within the EHR with the Link-out to the web portal.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool
Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.
BPA + FHIR
Instead of a link to the web-based portal, the BPA will contain a link to the FHIR-integrated CDS tool portal. FHIR will automatically pull EHR data about the patient into the CDS tool portal. Data include demographic information, comorbidities in the active problem list, past medical and surgical history, and social history. Clinicians will also receive training before the implementation of this step.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool
Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool
Implementation of an EHR-based CDS tool for providers to use.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Recent brain, eye or spinal cord injury or surgery; OR
* ED stroke, death or hospitalization at index visit; OR
* Patient transferred from another hospital (to ensure availability of index ED visit data); OR
* Left against medical advice; OR
* Evidence of non-OAC naïve patient:
* OAC prescribed in the prior 3mo to index ED visit; OR
* Being managed by an anticoagulation clinic (ACC);
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bory Kea
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bory Kea, MD, MCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00022471
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.