IMplementation of an RCT to imProve Treatment With Oral AntiCoagulanTs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT03259373
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64666 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-25
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) on Thromboprophylaxis for Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02524977
A Study to Quantify Use of Anticoagulation to Improve Management of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03382613
Supporting Use of AC Through Provider Profiling of Oral AC Therapy for AF IV
NCT05236556
Supporting Use of AC Through Provider Profiling of Oral AC Therapy for AF
NCT03583008
Shared Decision Making to Address Racial Disparities in Oral Anticoagulation in NVAF
NCT04956978
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The control cohort will receive usual care over the initial study period. After the date on which at least 80% of eligible study participants have at least 12 months of follow-up time, "fresh" pharmacy claims data for the control intervention cohort that was generated and locked at the time of randomization will be used to assess trial eligibility, and those patients without evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be included in the primary and secondary analyses as the control arm. Patients randomized to the control arm with evidence of an OAC medication fill during the 12 months prior to randomization will be excluded from the trial and will not be included in analyses. The baseline characteristics of the control patients will be examined at the same time point as the intervention patients, meaning at the time of randomization. The primary outcome is a comparison of the proportion of patients not on OAC during the 12 months prior to randomization, who were started on OAC over the course of the follow-up through the date on which at least 80% of eligible study participants have at least 12 months of follow-up time in the early versus the delayed intervention arm. A total of approximately 80,000 patients (randomized 1:1) across all participating data partners (Aetna, Harvard Pilgrim, Humana, and Optum) will be enrolled from participating data partners across the United States. The follow-up time for the primary outcome will be 12 months from the date at which at least 80% of eligible study participates are enrolled (date on which early intervention materials are mailed).
The providers of patients in the control cohort who did not receive OAC medication during the course of the 12-month study period and meet the inclusion criteria will receive the delayed intervention: the provider-only education intervention, a one-time mailing administered 12 months after at least 80% of early intervention mailings have occurred (patients will not receive any educational materials). The investigators intend to assess the primary and secondary endpoints again 24 months after at least 80% of early intervention mailings have occurred to assess the durability and longer-term outcomes of the effect of the patient- and provider-level education intervention, as well as the use of OAC following the delayed provider-level education intervention. However, as this second assessment is exploratory, investigators may not conduct these analyses if the results of the primary outcome are consistently null.
Because the Sentinel Distributed Database will be used for follow-up information, and this information is refreshed approximately quarterly and this is done on separate timetables for the different health plans, it is likely that when at least the required follow-up time is available for at least 80% of people, there will be more than 12 or 24 months of followup for over 80% of people. All participants' outcomes will be assessed using all possible person-time; patients will have different duration of follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Educational mailing to (1) AF patients with guideline-based indications for oral anticoagulation (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater) who appear to not have received OAC treatment at time of randomization and (2) their providers, where an individual provider may be identified
Early Patient-Level and Provider-Level Educational Intervention
Letters to patients that (1) explain to the patient that he or she appears to have AF, characterize the risk of stroke, and emphasize that although there may be a medical reason, the patient does not seem to be on an anticoagulant and (2) encourage the patient to discuss this with his or her provider to ask if he or she might benefit from OAC therapy to prevent stroke.
Early intervention letters to providers explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of the provider's patients who have been contacted, as the provider and patient letters will be sent at approximately the same time; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Control
Educational mailing to providers of AF patients with guideline-based indications for oral anticoagulation (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater) who appear to not have received OAC treatment in the time following randomization. These patients will have received 'usual care' for the time between randomization and delayed educational mailing.
Delayed Provider-Level Educational Intervention
Delayed intervention letters to patients' providers, where they may be identified, that explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of their patients who are flagged as at risk for stroke and have not been treated with an oral anticoagulant; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early Patient-Level and Provider-Level Educational Intervention
Letters to patients that (1) explain to the patient that he or she appears to have AF, characterize the risk of stroke, and emphasize that although there may be a medical reason, the patient does not seem to be on an anticoagulant and (2) encourage the patient to discuss this with his or her provider to ask if he or she might benefit from OAC therapy to prevent stroke.
Early intervention letters to providers explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of the provider's patients who have been contacted, as the provider and patient letters will be sent at approximately the same time; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Delayed Provider-Level Educational Intervention
Delayed intervention letters to patients' providers, where they may be identified, that explain this project, the nature of the problem, and identify a list of their patients who are flagged as at risk for stroke and have not been treated with an oral anticoagulant; describe evidence and guidelines regarding oral anticoagulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 or greater
3. Medical and pharmacy insurance coverage of at least the prior year as identified via administrative claims databases of one of the participating data partners as of the date of randomization
4. Age 30 years or greater as of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
Exclusion Criteria
2. Conditions other than AF that require anticoagulation, including treatment of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or ever having had a mechanical prosthetic heart valve prior to the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
3. Pregnancy within 6 months of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
4. Any known history of intracranial hemorrhage prior to the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
5. Hospitalization for bleeding within the last 6 months of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
6. Patients with recent P2Y12 antagonist use (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine, or ticagrelor within 90 days of the last date in the current approved data used for cohort identification
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke Clinical Research Institute
OTHER
Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative
OTHER
Humana Inc.
INDUSTRY
Aetna, Inc.
INDUSTRY
OptumInsight Life Sciences, Inc.
UNKNOWN
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
FED
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Richard Platt
Professor and Department Chair
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Humana Healthcare Research, Inc.
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Quincy, Massachusetts, United States
OptumInsight, Inc
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Aetna, Inc.
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pokorney SD, Cocoros N, Al-Khalidi HR, Haynes K, Li S, Al-Khatib SM, Corrigan-Curay J, Driscoll MR, Garcia C, Calvert SB, Harkins T, Jin R, Knecht D, Levenson M, Lin ND, Martin D, McCall D, McMahill-Walraven C, Nair V, Parlett L, Petrone A, Temple R, Zhang R, Zhou Y, Platt R, Granger CB. Effect of Mailing Educational Material to Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians on Use of Oral Anticoagulants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14321.
Garcia CJ, Haynes K, Pokorney SD, Lin ND, McMahill-Walraven C, Nair V, Parlett L, Martin D, Al-Khalidi HR, McCall D, Granger CB, Platt R, Cocoros NM. Practical challenges in the conduct of pragmatic trials embedded in health plans: Lessons of IMPACT-AFib, an FDA-Catalyst trial. Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):360-367. doi: 10.1177/1740774520928426. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
White Paper: Developing Approaches to Conducting Randomized Trials Using the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database
Sentinel Initiative IMPACT-AFib Project Page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMPACT-AFib
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.