Clinical Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT02635685

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

442105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-11

Study Completion Date

2025-01-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A cluster randomised study in the primary care setting to evaluate a electronic clinical decision tool for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common form of arrhythmia, affecting more than three percent of the population. The condition carries an increased risk of thromboembolism, in particular stroke. In 2013 approximately 25000 acute strokes were diagnosed in Sweden, with the result of death or severe disability in nearly half of the cases. Numerous studies have shown that the risk for stroke can be reduced by approximately 60-70 % with the use of anticoagulant therapy to patients with one or several risk factors for stroke and concurrent atrial fibrillation. The European Society of Cardiology recommends use of the CHA2DS2VASc algorithm to identify persons at increased risk for stroke in the setting of atrial fibrillation. Prophylaxis is recommended if CHA2DS2VASc ≥ 1 (not only female gender).

The agents used include warfarin and the more recently developed non-vitamin k oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Despite good evidence and recommendations in current guidelines, however, there remains a substantial undertreatment in this group of patients.

The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions have shown that only 63% of patients with a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2 are prescribed anticoagulant therapy \[7\]. The reasons for this is most likely multifactorial, including ignorance of the CHA2DS2VASc algorithm as well as reluctance of the use of potent drugs from both doctors and patients. Furthermore, the high pace in modern medicine increase the risk of missing the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and/or the conditions constituting the CHA2DS2VASc algorithm.

Clinical decision tools is a relatively new phenomena in modern medicine showing promising results, but evidence for clinical outcome are sparse. The clinical decision tool for stroke prevention (CDSS) has been developed in collaboration between Cambio Cosmic (the supplier of the electronic journal in the county of Östergötland), the Cardiology Department at Linköping University hospital and primary care professionals. The decision tool is activated when a patient is being logged into the electronic journal. If the patient has a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (or atrial flutter) and a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 1 (not only female gender) without current anticoagulant therapy, a screen warning will appear. By clicking on the warning, the responsible physician will get an overview of the patient's diagnosis according to the CHA2DS2VASc algorithm. Furthermore, a calculation of the estimated stroke risk for the coming year will appear, and links to national guidelines be provided. The physician can thereafter decide to prescribe anticoagulant therapy in accordance with current guidelines or, alternatively, postpone the decision/make a decision to refrain from medication. In case the choice is made to refrain from medication the physician is asked to choose between a set of predetermined reasons in order to monitor the main reasons for deviation from guidelines.

If, on the other hand, the patient has anticoagulant therapy in accordance with current guidelines, no screen warning will appear.

CDSS has shown promising results in a pilot study conducted at five units in the County of Östergötland during the fall of 2014. The aim of the present study is to investigate this computerized decision tool in a large randomized trial in the primary care setting.

Study design The present study is a cluster randomized study in the primary care setting in the County of Östergötland, Sweden. The investigators intend to include all primary care units (n = 43) in the County of Östergötland. Participation is non-compulsory. The population in the County of Östergötland is 442 105 (December 2014)

At the time of inclusion all primary care units will be stratified in four strata based on the number of patients listed on each unit and current adherence to guidelines (i.e. the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2VASc ≥ 1 (not only female gender) that are currently prescribed anticoagulant therapy). They will thereafter be randomized to intervention with the CDSS application or serve as a control unit (continue with usual care, randomized 1:1). Prior to randomization all the participating general practitioners will receive an education about atrial fibrillation and the associated risk of stroke, including the CHA2DS2VASc algorithm and an overview of anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, all units receiving the CDSS will have a briefing about the technical aspects of using the application.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Disease Atrial Fibrillation Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Intervention with Clinical Decision Support tool installed on units.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical Decision Support tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Automatized support tool for identification of patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation without appropriate anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention.

Control group

Control group without intervention with Clinical Decision Support tool installed on units.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical Decision Support tool

Automatized support tool for identification of patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation without appropriate anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary care centers in the county of Östergötland, Sweden.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Linkoeping University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Linkoeping

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lars Karlsson

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lars O Karlsson, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The County of Östergötland

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Friberg L, Bergfeldt L. Atrial fibrillation prevalence revisited. J Intern Med. 2013 Nov;274(5):461-8. doi: 10.1111/joim.12114. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23879838 (View on PubMed)

Riks-stroke. Annual report 2013 (in Swedish). http://www.riksstroke.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Strokerapport_AKUTTIA3man_LR.pdf. Accessed November 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):857-67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17577005 (View on PubMed)

Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines-CPG; Document Reviewers. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation--developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2012 Oct;14(10):1385-413. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus305. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22923145 (View on PubMed)

Bjorck S, Palaszewski B, Friberg L, Bergfeldt L. Atrial fibrillation, stroke risk, and warfarin therapy revisited: a population-based study. Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3103-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002329. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23982711 (View on PubMed)

Kakkar AK, Mueller I, Bassand JP, Fitzmaurice DA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, Haas S, Hacke W, Lip GY, Mantovani LG, Turpie AG, van Eickels M, Misselwitz F, Rushton-Smith S, Kayani G, Wilkinson P, Verheugt FW; GARFIELD Registry Investigators. Risk profiles and antithrombotic treatment of patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: perspectives from the international, observational, prospective GARFIELD registry. PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e63479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063479. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23704912 (View on PubMed)

Öppna jämförelser: hälso- och sjukvård 2014, del 2 (in Swedish). http://webbutik.skl.se/sv/artiklar/oppna-jamforelser-halso-och-sjukvard-2014-del-1.html. Accessed December 4, 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lobach D, Sanders GD, Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux R, Samsa G, Hasselblad V, Williams JW, Wing L, Musty M, Kendrick AS. Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Apr;(203):1-784.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23126650 (View on PubMed)

Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, Samsa G, Hasselblad V, Williams JW, Musty MD, Wing L, Kendrick AS, Sanders GD, Lobach D. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22751758 (View on PubMed)

Persson Lindell O, Henriksson M, Karlsson LO, Nilsson S, Charitakis E, Janzon M. Cost-effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for atrial fibrillation: an RCT-based modelling study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Aug 1;6(5):997-1005. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf087. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40984984 (View on PubMed)

Karlsson LO, Nilsson S, Bang M, Nilsson L, Charitakis E, Janzon M. A clinical decision support tool for improving adherence to guidelines on anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: A cluster-randomized trial in a Swedish primary care setting (the CDS-AF study). PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 13;15(3):e1002528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002528. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29534063 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015/398-32

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Markers of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02734758 COMPLETED