Gastric Bypass With Different Lengths of the Bilipancreatic Limb

NCT ID: NCT05334173

Last Updated: 2023-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-29

Study Completion Date

2026-09-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result.

There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs.

The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb.

The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm).

PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life.

DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI\>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI\>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI\>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL).

The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Obesity Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Hypertension Dyslipidemias Sleep Apnea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized trial in blocks (1:1). Type 1 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RYGB TYPE 1 - LONGER ALIMENTARY LIMB (LAL-GB)

150 cm alimentary limb and 70 cm biliopancreatic limb

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.

RYGB TYPE 2 - LONGER BILIOPANCREATIC LIMB (LBPL-GB)

70 cm alimentary limb and 150 cm biliopancreatic limb

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) measuring the lengh of the common limb

The patients are randomized to Type 1 laparoscopic RYGB (150cm alimentary limb and 70cm biliopancreatic limb) or type 2 laparoscopic RYGB (70cm alimentary limb and 150cm biliopancreatic limb). In both groups, the total intestinal length is measured to determine the size of the common limb. We introduce a 10 cm ruler into the abdominal cavity to measure the bowel and then extract it. LRYGB is made with linear stapler anastomosis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 150cm / 70cm Biliopancreatic and alimentary limbs of 70cm / 150cm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with BMI 35-40 kg/m2 with associated medical problems (Diabetes Mellitus, Hipertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome) or 40-50 kg/m2 with or without associated medical problems, who comply with the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Spain (SECO and AEC)

Exclusion Criteria

* General contraindications to kind of surgery
* BMI \> 50 kg/m2
* Known drug or alcohol abuse
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification \> III
* Inability to follow the procedures of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Débora Acín

MD, PhD, Bariatric Surgeon

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Juan José Arroyo Martín

Denia, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Esther Mans Muntwyler

Mataró, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Débora Acín Gándara

Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BPG-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.