Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT ID: NCT02475590
Last Updated: 2018-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT00667706
Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Bipartition(SG+TB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Type 3 Obesity
NCT04915014
An Evaluation of the Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery - a Cohort Study
NCT02811900
Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
NCT01806506
Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery
NCT01754194
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The gastric bypass, developed in the 60s, is performed laparoscopically since the early 90s. It allows for a 60% to 70% excess weight loss with control over 75% of comorbidities. It is recommended to follow these patients long-term because late complications can occur. These patients require ongoing information and regular monitoring. They must also have a hyper-protein diet and a vitamin substitute long-term (multivitamins, vitamin B12, calcium ...).
The Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) arises as an alternative to RYGB. It was classically proposed to patients with a BMI greater than 60 and significant comorbidities since the procedure let to a significant weight reduction in patients for whom any other procedure was too difficult to perform. The quality of the weight loss achieved in these patients has led many teams to analyze the results of this intervention without conducting an additional procedure. It appears from the literature that even performed alone, SG presents many benefits.
To clarify the role of sleeve gastrectomy in the bariatric procedures range, the investigators propose to conduct a prospective randomized study to compare laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No contraindication to any of the procedures
* No contraindication to general anesthesia
* No known addiction
* Patient able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Known psychiatric pathology
* Pregnancy
* Previous major digestive surgery
* Immunosuppressive treatment including corticoids
* Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5) or platelets \< 50 000/µl
* Anemia (Hb\<10g/dl)
* Severe comorbidity
* Malabsorptive disease or gastro-intestinal disease
* Myocardial infarction in previous year, angina, cardiac failure
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCAD
UNKNOWN
IHU Strasbourg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jacques Marescaux, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Strasbourg university hospital, IRCAD, IHU Strasbourg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne
Strasbourg, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vix M, Diana M, Liu KH, D'Urso A, Mutter D, Wu HS, Marescaux J. Evolution of glycolipid profile after sleeve gastrectomy vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2013 May;23(5):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0827-5.
Ignat M, Vix M, Imad I, D'Urso A, Perretta S, Marescaux J, Mutter D. Randomized trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in achieving excess weight loss. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):248-256. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10400. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
Vix M, Liu KH, Diana M, D'Urso A, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on vitamin D metabolism: short-term results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):821-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3276-x. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-A01590-55
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.