Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Autistic Spectrum Disorder

NCT ID: NCT05311982

Last Updated: 2022-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To understand the changes in the resting electroencephalogram (EEG) brain networks of children and adolescents with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) induced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we asked two questions. First: how can tDCS modulate the expression of neural network dynamics? Second: how can tDCS modulate functional connections at specific frequencies? We hypothesized that the tDCS mechanism results in increased cortical frequencies in the areas under the anode, which may reflect an increase in synaptic connectivity, and that this tDCS-related increase changes connection profiles at specific frequencies important for ASD, indicating improvement in symptoms. To verify this improvement, the researchers used the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) after an intervention, comparing baseline scores with post-treatment scores.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autistic Disorders Spectrum

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DLPFC-L F3 (Block A)

The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in DLPFC-L F3 (Block A)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

direct current brain stimulation- The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in DLPFC-L F3 (Block A), combined tDCS in DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) simultaneously (Block B) or sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness. After the procedures, each participant received the following intervention in the order ABC, BCA or CAB with a period of 1 week between each one. Each block took 3 weeks, organized into: 1) Assessment; 2) Application of stimulation; 3) Reassessment and washout week. Adding 1 more week of final evaluation, the study totaled the period of 10 weeks. During this period, patients were instructed to continue their behavioral/educational treatment and medication routines.

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) (Bock B)

sham-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness

tDCS combined in DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4)

The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in tDCS combined in DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

direct current brain stimulation- The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in DLPFC-L F3 (Block A), combined tDCS in DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) simultaneously (Block B) or sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness. After the procedures, each participant received the following intervention in the order ABC, BCA or CAB with a period of 1 week between each one. Each block took 3 weeks, organized into: 1) Assessment; 2) Application of stimulation; 3) Reassessment and washout week. Adding 1 more week of final evaluation, the study totaled the period of 10 weeks. During this period, patients were instructed to continue their behavioral/educational treatment and medication routines.

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) (Bock B)

sham-tDCS

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness

Sham (Block C)

The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in tDCS Sham

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

direct current brain stimulation- The study was developed through a triple-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (dummy tDCS). Participants were randomized into three groups receiving unilateral tDCS in DLPFC-L F3 (Block A), combined tDCS in DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) simultaneously (Block B) or sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness. After the procedures, each participant received the following intervention in the order ABC, BCA or CAB with a period of 1 week between each one. Each block took 3 weeks, organized into: 1) Assessment; 2) Application of stimulation; 3) Reassessment and washout week. Adding 1 more week of final evaluation, the study totaled the period of 10 weeks. During this period, patients were instructed to continue their behavioral/educational treatment and medication routines.

Intervention Type DEVICE

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) TDCS

DLPFC-L (F3) and DLPFC-R (F4) (Bock B)

Intervention Type DEVICE

sham-tDCS

sham-tDCS (Block C) with equal electrode configuration guaranteed blindness

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

nibs NIBS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with ASD reported by a Neuropediatrician; Age group between 5 and 18 years; Mild and moderate clinical symptoms

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with severe mental illness; Use of a pacemaker or other metal device on the body; Brain tumor or intracranial infection; Uncooperative parents or caregivers; Epilepsy; structural change in the skull
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Paraíba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suellen Marinho Andrade

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suellen Marinho Andrade

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil

Site Status

Federal University of Paraíba,Department of Psychology

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Tdcs Autism ufpb

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.