Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-02
2023-04-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CPB Prime Fluid Strategies to Preserve Mcirocirculatory Perfusion
NCT05647057
Prevention of Retained-Blood Outcomes With Active Clearance Technology
NCT02145858
Optimization of Prime Fluid Strategy to Preserve Microcirculatory Perfusion During Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Part II
NCT05647200
Algorithm-Guided Transfusions in Cardiac Surgery Patients for Reduction of Drainage Blood Losses
NCT01402739
Pleural and Pericardial Effusion Following Open Heart Surgery
NCT02045641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prolonged or excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery can lead to a broad spectrum of secondary complications. One of the underlying causes is incomplete wound drainage, with subsequent accumulation of blood and clots in the pericardium. It has been demonstrated that this retained blood and clots lead to even more fibrinolytic activity in the mediastinum and pericardial space, and therefore may contribute to increased or prolonged bleeding. Based on this principle, the method of continuous postoperative pericardial flushing (CPPF) has been invented and further developed. The hypothesis is that CPPF therapy works by mechanical cleaning properties and by diminishing fibrinolysis and inflammation. The CPPF protocol includes the inflow of NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first postoperative hours in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In this way, the blood and clot mixture can be diluted into a lower viscosity solution, thereby enhancing the evacuation of blood and clots from the pericardial space and preventing chest tube obstruction.
The Haermonics investigational device
Because CPPF therapy includes the dilution of the normal postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), the clinical assessment of the exact amount of blood loss is more difficult. Yet, blood loss is an important factor in clinical decision making, namely the decision if the patient needs a surgical re-exploration for postoperative bleeding or not. Roughly, in patients who receive CPPF therapy, blood loss can be estimated by extracting the total inflow flushing volume from the total MCTD. This method was used in the experimental setting of the previous CPPF trails but is considered unsuitable for use in daily practice because of three reasons. First, the required registration of in- and outflow volume is labour intensive. Secondly, because this registration can only be done intermittently, which can be dangerous in case of a fast bleeding rate. Thirdly, blood loss calculation could potentially be inaccurate because sometimes, clinically insignificant, amounts of flushing fluid are retained or absorbed in the pericardial or pleural spaces, thereby making the blood loss calculation inaccurate.
The first commercial Haermonics device will have four essential functionalities that make CPPF therapy safe and feasible for daily clinical use. 1) Automatic monitoring of the outflow volume, 2) Quantification of the content of the outflow volume by means of real time and continuous haematocrit (hct) analysis of the MCTD, 3) Warming of the flushing fluid to body temperature and temperature measurements of the flushing fluid, and 4) Continuous intrapericardial pressure measurement. The investigational device that will be used in this study will have all these functionalities, but available data will not be used for clinical decision making yet.
Previous studies
CPPF, executed with a researcher instead of a medical device, has been investigated in two randomized clinical trials. The CPPF protocol included the inflow of 500 ml NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first 12 postoperative hours in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. In this way, the blood and clot mixture were diluted into a lower viscosity solution, thereby enhancing the evacuation of blood and clots from the pericardial space and preventing chest tube obstruction. In two distinct cardiac surgery populations, both trials showed CPPF led to a statistically significant reduction in the primary outcome, i.e., blood loss, while pooled data showed a statistically significant difference for the clinically most relevant secondary end points, like the incidence of re-interventions for either non-surgical bleeding and/or acute cardiac tamponade (0 vs. 8 in CPPF vs. control group).
The present study is powered to assess the effects of CPPF, executed by the Haermonics investigational device, in comparison with standard care on these clinically more relevant endpoints in a population of adult cardiac surgery patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flushing
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flushing (inflow of 500 ml NaCl 0,9% flushing fluid into the pericardial cavity during the first 8 postoperative hours) executed with the Haermonics investigational device
CPPF
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flush
Control
Standard care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPPF
Continuous Postoperative Pericardial Flush
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG),
* Valve surgery,
* CABG combined with valve surgery
* Elective patients scheduled for aortic surgery (including valve sparing root replacement (VSRR), Bentall procedures, ascending aorta- aortic arch replacement)
Including the initial study population:
* Patients scheduled for CABG with continued DAPT
* Patients with aIE scheduled for valve replacement
* Patients scheduled for complex or multiple cardiac (redo) procedures with an (expected) CPB time \>300 minutes
* Patients undergoing aortic surgery with DHCA
Exclusion Criteria
* Intraoperatively diaphragm injury leading to an open connection between the thoracic and abdominal cavity
* Age \< 18
* Inability to understand study information
* Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device
* Emergent procedures
* Procedures performed off pump, without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.
* Minimal invasive cardiac surgery procedures (e.g. minithoracotomy and hemisternotomy)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haermonics BV
INDUSTRY
European Regional Development Fund
OTHER
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eva Diephuis
Medical doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
R. Klautz, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam UMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, , Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL74428
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.