Rehabilitation Strategies to Improve Outcomes For Patients With a Lower Extremity Fracture
NCT ID: NCT05274022
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-03
2025-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rapid Rehabilitation to Treat Lower Extremity Trauma
NCT05225792
Electromyostimulation and Strength Walking for Knee Injuries
NCT02065518
Pre- and Post-Operative Exercise in Patients With Hip Fracture
NCT05389800
Addition of Aerobic Training to Conventional Rehabilitation After Femur Fracture
NCT04025866
Early Strength Training After Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT01616030
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Increasingly, HIIT style training programs have been used in other clinical populations (heart conditions, kidney failure, severely obese) to yield improved health outcomes and have been shown to be safe and effective. However, this work has not been extended to the orthopedic trauma population. Initiating a treadmill HIIT program during recovery from a lower extremity fracture may prove pivotal to restoring functional abilities, improving strength, and optimizing patient outcomes.
As a starting point to investigate the speed HIIT walking program following an orthopedic trauma, the investigators will focus on femoral and tibial shaft fractures requiring surgical fixation. Subjects will be recruited at a follow-up visit and therefore will not have impaired consent capacity issues at that juncture based on their fracture-related injuries. Even though early postoperative weight bearing has been shown to be safe, there continues to be considerable divergence in recovery after these fractures. For instance, return to work rates for individuals with physical jobs has been reported to be as low as 14% within the first year, resulting in significant stress and financial challenges for the individual. Clearly, improved post-operative rehabilitation strategies are needed for this population.
Aim 1: Assess the feasibility and adherence of the speed HIIT walk program within subjects with a lower extremity fracture.
Primary Hypothesis: 70% of subjects approached about the study will consent and that 80% of subjects will complete the study.
Secondary hypothesis: 80% of subjects will complete all of the treatment sessions and find the treatment (both intervention and standard of care physical therapy) acceptable.
Aim 2: Determine the preliminary effects of the speed HIIT program as compared to the standard of care on patient reported outcomes, functional outcomes and return to work rates, in a pilot randomized control trial.
Primary Hypotheses: Participants in the speed HIIT intervention group will have a significantly higher PROMIS physical function scale as compared to standard of care group at a 6 month follow up.
Secondary hypotheses: Participants in the Speed HIIT intervention group will have higher return to work rates, usual and fastest gait speed, timed step-down test, and 6-minute walk test than the standard of care group at a 6 month follow up.
Tertiary hypothesis: The participants in the speed HIIT program will maintain higher physical function and return to work rates at a 12 month follow up as compared to the standard of care group
Aim 3: Quantify the differences in ground reaction forces, function, psychosocial responses, and patient reported outcomes that occur at the completion of the speed HIIT walk program as compared to the group receiving standard of care physical therapy.
Primary Hypotheses: Participants in the speed HIIT program will be significantly more symmetric in their peak ground reaction force metrics (impulse, loading rates, time, peak values), and have greater self reported physical function, functional outcomes and patient reported outcomes as compared to the standard of care group at the completion of the intervention (19 weeks post hospital discharge).
Secondary hypotheses: Participants completing the speed HIIT program will have greater pain self-efficacy and less fear of movement as compared to the standard of care at the completion of the intervention (19 weeks post hospital discharge) that is maintained at a 6 and 12 month follow up.
Tertiary hypothesis: The participants in the speed HIIT program will maintain higher symmetry in their peak ground reaction force metrics (impulse, loading rates, time, peak values) as compared to the standard of care group at a 6 month follow up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care Physical Therapy Program
Standard of care will follow best practice. The subjects and their physical therapists will be provided with a standardized set of exercises and guidance on what to cover during skilled physical therapy visits.
Standard of Care Physical Therapy Program
Standard of care will follow best practice. The subjects and their physical therapists will be provided with a standardized set of exercises and guidance on what to cover during skilled physical therapy visits. As part of the study, all patients will receive the same exercise program. Exercises will include lower extremity strengthening, balance, and mobility exercises with the use of modalities as needed
Standard of Care Physical Therapy Program with Speed Walking Intervention
Standard of care will follow best practice. The subjects and their physical therapists will be provided with a standardized set of exercises and guidance on what to cover during skilled physical therapy visits. Additionally, subjects will complete the speed walking intervention. Participants will perform at 2 minute warm up followed by 1 minute of walking at their fastest tolerable speed followed by 2 minutes of active recovery where they will walk at a speed of their choosing. The subjects will perform 4 cycles of this followed by a 2 minute cool down at the end.
Standard of Care Physical Therapy Program
Standard of care will follow best practice. The subjects and their physical therapists will be provided with a standardized set of exercises and guidance on what to cover during skilled physical therapy visits. As part of the study, all patients will receive the same exercise program. Exercises will include lower extremity strengthening, balance, and mobility exercises with the use of modalities as needed
Speed Walking Intervention
The 4-6 week program will consist of a warm up of active stretching. Following the warm up, subjects will perform a 2 minute warm up followed by 1 minute of walking at their fastest comfortable speed followed by 2 minutes of active recovery where they will walk at a speed of their choosing for 4cycles and then a 2 minute cool down. The program will be performed 12 visits over 4-6 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard of Care Physical Therapy Program
Standard of care will follow best practice. The subjects and their physical therapists will be provided with a standardized set of exercises and guidance on what to cover during skilled physical therapy visits. As part of the study, all patients will receive the same exercise program. Exercises will include lower extremity strengthening, balance, and mobility exercises with the use of modalities as needed
Speed Walking Intervention
The 4-6 week program will consist of a warm up of active stretching. Following the warm up, subjects will perform a 2 minute warm up followed by 1 minute of walking at their fastest comfortable speed followed by 2 minutes of active recovery where they will walk at a speed of their choosing for 4cycles and then a 2 minute cool down. The program will be performed 12 visits over 4-6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute orthopedic injury to the femoral or tibial shaft requiring surgical fixation with an intramedullary rod
* Age 18-50 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
* Initial treatment requiring amputation
* Not employed at the time of the accident at least 20 hours per week.
* Spinal cord injury
* History of schizophrenia, dementia or neurologic disorder with peripheral dysfunction
* Non ambulatory or limited ability to walk without an assistive device prior to the fracture
* Multiple trauma that prevents early weight bearing
* Current Pregnancy
* Unable to participate in or complete in-person follow-up visits or therapy sessions
* In outpatient Physical Therapy at the start of the intervention
* Use of an assistive device to walk for community ambulation at the 10-12 weeks post hospital discharge time point
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
FED
Brian W. Noehren
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian W. Noehren
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Noehren, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDMRP-CDMRP-OR200133-A
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
65286
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.