Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-01
2019-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the ICU, sepsis maybe community acquired (already present on admission) or hospital acquired (obtained during ICU stay).
This study will add adequate data about incidence and outcome of sepsis in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sepsis in ICU:Causes and Outcomes of Sepsis in Diabetics Versus Non Diabetics in Assiut University Hospital
NCT04015752
Sepsis in ICU:Causes and Outcomes in Diabetics and Non Diabetics
NCT05914480
Assessment of Red Cell Distribution Width's Prognostic Ability in Septic Intensive Care Unit Patients
NCT06847451
Thyroid and Adrenal Disorders in ICU
NCT07245550
The Early Prediction of Sepsis in ICU
NCT05088850
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients and Methods:
This prospective observational cohort study was conducted upon patients admitted at Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) of Abbassia Chest Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, either with sepsis or acquired sepsis in the RICU; from 1st of May 2019 to 30th of November 2019.
o Inclusion Criteria: Patients ≥ 18 years old with sepsis or septic shock either on admission or acquired at RICU and all episodes of sepsis for the same patient were counted.
o Exclusion Criteria: Patients with length of stay (LOS) at RICU less than 24 hours, patients readmitted at RICU during the same hospitalization, patients admitted at RICU post cardiac arrest, or patients with malignancies.
Data collection and recording:
On admission, the following was done and recorded for all participants:
1. Detailed medical history; including history of previous ICU admission or mechanical ventilation, last antibiotic intake, infected intra venous (IV) or central venous (CV) lines, associated comorbidities and reason of ICU admission.
2. Full general and local chest clinical examination.
3. Need for vasoactive therapy, fluid balance and need for renal replacement therapy.
4. Laboratory investigations:
* Complete blood picture (CBC).
* Arterial blood gases analysis (ABGs) on a daily basis.
* Serum Sodium (Na) and Potassium (K).
* Liver and Kidney function tests.
* Serum lactate (repeated when needed to fulfill criteria for diagnosis of septic shock).
5. Radiological investigations;
* Chest X ray (CXR).
* Computed Tomography chest, or brain (when appropriate).
6. Microbiological samples culture and sensitivity (when appropriate): Sputum, urine, pleural fluid, or from infected IV line according to the suspected site. Type of infection (community or hospital acquired), infection site: (lungs, urinary tract, abdomen, surgical wound), pathogenic organisms (gram positive, gram negative, atypical bacteria and fungi) were recorded.
7. Scores:
1. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score was recorded at emergency room. (3)
2. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was recorded upon RICU admission and on 3rd and 7th day of ICU stay. (4)
3. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was recorded within 24 hours from patient RICU admission. (3,5)
8. Recording of following points:
* Number of patients who were on mechanical ventilation, length of RICU stay, presence of comorbidities, survived patients and dead ones, as regards causes of death and risk factors.
* Complications e.g., acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute kidney injury (AKI), septic shock.
Measured Outcomes:
* Primary: Incidence of sepsis, mortality from sepsis.
* Secondary: RICU length of stay due to sepsis, complications from sepsis, mechanical ventilation due to sepsis, need for vasoactive agents.
* Total RICU mortality was also recorded.
Management:
All patients were subjected to the following management protocol regarding the recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle Update (6):
1. Measuring lactate level with serial measurement if it was more than 2 mmol/L.
2. Blood culture prior to antibiotic administration.
3. For patients with sepsis, early empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy initiated antimicrobial coverage included either an extended spectrum beta lactam, a third or fourth generation cephalosporin, or a carbapenem. Additional consideration was paid to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) risk factors and if present, empiric vancomycin administration was advised. Widespread use of combination therapy, the use of multiple antibiotics with different pharmacodynamic profiles and mechanisms of action reported a synergistic effect with the addition of an aminoglycoside to a beta- lactam Combination therapy has been shown to improve survival. Patients with a high risk of mortality such as septic shock received a combination therapy with at least two different classes of antibiotics depending on type of organism, source of infection, choice of antibiotics kept in mind the most organisms isolated from septic patients.
4. Early fluid resuscitation using 30 mL/Kg crystalloid fluid was given for cases of hypotension or when lactate level \> 4mmol/L.
5. Perfusion assessment using CVP and central venues oxygen saturation.
6. Vasopressor use (norepinephrine was given) for persistent hypotension to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg.
7. Adjunctive therapy with steroids (200 mg IV hydrocortisone/day) was given in patients with sepsis who remain hemodynamically unstable despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy.
8. Glycemic control was done when patient's blood glucose level exceeded 180 mg/dL by administrating insulin.
Study tools and definitions:
The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was used to demonstrate organ dysfunction (4). Sepsis was defined as having SOFA score of 2 or more plus evidence of infection. Septic shock was defined when persistent hypotension required the use of vasopressors to maintain a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, and a serum lactate \> 2 mmol/L that persisted despite adequate fluid resuscitation. (4) Infection was suspected and confirmed from history, examination, laboratory, radiological and microbiological investigations. ICU acquired infection was defined as infection identified at least 48 hours after ICU admission, while non-ICU acquired infection was defined as infection presented on admission or within the first 48 hours after ICU admission. (7) ARDS was defined according to Berlin definition (8). Acute kidney injury was defined as an abrupt (within hours) decrease in kidney function based on an acute decrease of glomerular filtration rate, as reflected by an acute rise in serum creatinine levels and/or a decline in urine output over a given time interval. (9)
Statistical Analysis:
Data were collected, revised, coded and entered to the Statistical Package for Social Science (IBM SPSS) version 23. The quantitative data were presented as mean, standard deviation, frequency (number of cases and percentage) and ranges when their distribution found parametric and median with interquartile range when their distribution found non-parametric. Qualitative variables were presented as number and percentages. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups was done using student t- test and paired t-test. The comparison of categorical data was done by using Chi-square test. The level of significance was taken at p value ≤ 0.05 as follows: p \> 0.05: non-significant, p \< 0.05: significant and p \< 0.01: highly significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Corticosteroid Derivatives
observational
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ashraf A Elmaraghy
Associate Professor of Pulmonology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ashraf M Madkour, Prosessor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Abbassia Chest Hospital
Cairo, Abbassia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FMASU MS282/2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.