Better Together Physician Coaching: An Innovative Solution to Medical Trainee Burnout
NCT ID: NCT05222685
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1017 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To accomplish this goal, the investigators set the following major objectives for this project:
* Prepare to expand the BT program by teaming with a cohort of diverse physician coaches.
* Implement BT in 10+ GME programs to serve 1000+ trainee participants with deliberate inclusion of institutions with diverse GME trainee populations serving geographically rural and/or medically underserved areas.
* Assess our outcomes: primary: reduce burnout as measured by the Maslach Burnout Index (goal: 10% relative improvement), and secondary: self-compassion, imposter syndrome and moral injury. Outcome generalizability and program feasibility at a national level will also be analyzed, as will participant experience to gain a richer understanding of how BT may help trainees, in particular those URM.
* Advance the field of coaching in GME through innovation and dissemination of evidence-based approaches to GME trainee wellbeing.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Better Together Physician Coaching: Mitigating Burnout in UME
NCT05822375
Better Together Physician Coaching to Mitigate Burnout Amongst Clinicians
NCT05635448
Better Together: an Online Physician Coaching Program for Medical Trainees
NCT05280964
Better Together Physician Coaching to Mitigate Burnout in Male-Identifying Trainees
NCT05550753
Effect of Physician Peer Coaching on Burnout in Hospital-Based Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05251675
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Burnout refers to feelings of exhaustion, negativism, and reduced personal efficacy resulting from chronic workplace stress. In healthcare, burnout leads to increased medical errors, poorer patient care and negatively affects professional development and retention. Burnout is a growing problem that begins early in medical training. Women and those underrepresented in medicine (URM) experience a disproportionate amount of burnout likely due to the cognitive load required to manage microaggressions, stereotypes, and harmful socially adopted narratives around efficacy. Professional coaching is a metacognition tool with a sustainable positive effect on physician well-being but typically relies on expensive consultants or time-consuming faculty development, often making it infeasible for medical training programs to offer. To overcome this barrier, the investigators created Better Together Physician Coaching (BT) a 6-month coaching program for women residents at the University of Colorado (CU). BT includes regular online group-coaching, written coaching, and weekly self-study modules delivered by physician life coaches (Co-PIs). A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 101 BT participants demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in burnout, self-compassion, and imposter syndrome in the intervention group. This project will scale Better Together up to a national level and evaluated with an RCT mirroring our pilot in 10+ graduate medical education (GME) programs for 1000+ participants coordinated and evaluated by our CU team.
III. Preliminary Studies/Progress Report:
Within the past year, Co-PIs Drs. Adrienne Mann and Tyra Fainstad (AM, TF) created and implemented Better Together Physician Coaching (Better Together, or BT) at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. BT is a coaching program for female identifying GME trainees at CU and its affiliate hospitals (Denver Health, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, and The Children's Hospital). Using coaching techniques, BT challenges long-held paradigms fostered by medical training. BT aims primarily to reduce burnout as measured by the MBI with secondary aims to increase self-compassion, reduce imposter syndrome and decrease moral injury among residents who identify as women.
The Co-PIs (AM, TF) are both certified coaches through The Life Coach Schoolâ„¢, a training institution for thought-based coaching. This type of coaching focuses on thoughts and beliefs. It combines a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) model with mindfulness-based awareness and integrates theories of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), nonattachment, and radical questioning from Socratic and Greek philosophies. BT delivers a robust coaching experience via a 6-month web-based, group-coaching model. This novel program allows residents to participate as actively as they are inclined and able, offering flexibility via multiple modalities of coaching: twice weekly group coaching calls, unlimited anonymous written coaching, and weekly self-study modules that are housed on a secure members-only website.
To study the BT program, the Co-PIs received institutional support from the CU Department of Medicine to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), which included support for professional research assistants to both implement and evaluate the program. A convenience sample of 101 female-identifying CU GME trainees from 12 specialties (IM, Family Medicine, Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, OBGYN, General Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Dermatology, Psychiatry, Medicine-Pediatrics, Pathology, and Neurology) was recruited and randomized to receive the 6-month Better Together Program or no-intervention from January-June 2021. The median participant age was 29 years, and all were female-identifying. Of the 101 participants, 33 (32.7%) were PGY-1, 43 (42.6%) were PGY-2, 18 (17.8%) were PGY-3, and 7 (7%) PGY-4 or greater. Nineteen (19%) of participants were in a surgical residency specialty (general surgery, OBGYN, otolaryngology). There were no significant differences in these characteristics between the intervention and control groups at baseline.
All participants completed a pre-survey assessing burnout with the MBI which defines burnout by three subscales (Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA) as described above). Each item is a 7-point Likert-type question with a frequency response scale ranging from 0 = never to 6 = every day. Higher scores on the EE and DP, and lower scores on the PA subscales indicate greater burnout. Secondary outcomes included Self-compassion with Self-Compassion Scale Short-form (SCSS) where higher scores indicate greater self-compassion,30 the Young Imposter Syndrome Scale (YISS) where a score of more than 5 out of 8 points is diagnostic for Imposter Syndrome31 and the Moral Injury Symptom Scale (MISS) (score 10-100 points) where higher scores equal more moral injury.32
Participants were randomized to the intervention group, (N=50) or control group (N= 51). The intervention group received the 6-month BT coaching program. The control group received the usual wellbeing curriculum provided by their training program, but no BT intervention. Within the BT coaching group, the most frequent topics of coaching included feedback reception, professional appearance, approval-addiction, deficit hiding, balancing motherhood with residency, and low self-confidence. Participants engaged in the live coaching sessions with curiosity, vulnerability, and authenticity, often bringing highly personal and emotional issues to the sessions and supporting each other through encouragement in the Zoom chat function.
From the pilot RCT, the investigators found that at baseline over half of all participants were experiencing moderate or high burnout, consistent with national data. Participants were also experiencing low-moderate self-compassion (mean = 33.6 out of 60; SD=7.17); imposter syndrome (mean = 5.4 out of 8, where score of 5+ is diagnostic for imposter syndrome; SD=2.13); and moderate moral injury (mean =42.02 out of 100; SD=11.08). At the end of 6 months of coaching, a post-survey was offered to both the intervention and control groups. Of the 101 initial survey respondents, 79 responded to the post-survey (78%). A t-test was used to compare the change in subscale score means from baseline to 6 months in the BT coaching versus control groups for the primary and secondary outcomes.
The results on the MBI showed a statistically significant decrease in the emotional exhaustion (EE) dimension of burnout in the intervention group (p=0.03), and the DP and PA components of burnout both trended toward improvement. Self-compassion improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group, and imposter syndrome scores improved in the BT coaching group from 5.4 to 4.2 (p=0.01), effectively improving mean scores out of the range for imposter syndrome in this group. Moral injury also trended towards an improvement in the coaching vs control group from baseline to 6 months (40.7 to 35.6 versus 43.7 to 41.7 in intervention vs control, mean difference -3.84, p 0.10), but was not statistically significant.
Based on these promising findings in our pilot RCT, the investigators propose scaling Better Together to a national level to address the unmet need in GME programs to reduce burnout. The investigators are now preparing for a multi-institutional RCT to serve more female identifying trainees with a focus on those who are URM and practicing in medically underserved communities nationwide. The investigators aim to enroll GME programs with geographic and ethnic diversity as well as representative URM trainees to understand the impact of coaching in this vulnerable population.
This randomized controlled trial will mirror our pilot study in which all participants take a pre-survey with outcome measures, then they will be randomized into an intervention or control arm. The intervention group will receive BT during the first 6-months while the control group, or "waitlist group" will receive no intervention aside from the usual wellness activities of their institution. Then all participants will take a post survey. Finally, the control or "waitlist group" will be offered the 6-mont BT program following completion of the study.
The study will begin in September 2022 with approximately 1000 trainees 10+ participating sites. Following the pre-survey, participants will be randomized to the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive the 6-month BT program from 9/2022-2/2023. All participants will complete the post survey in 2/2023. Participants in the intervention group will be offered opportunities to complete qualitative interviews around the program experience after completion of the program. The control group will then be offered the Better Together program from 3/2023 - 9/2023.
Wrap-up:
The final 3 months will focus on preparing our final results for dissemination and finalizing our sustainability plan as the investigators prepare for our future planned funding model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Will receive the 6 month online group coaching program from 9/1/2022-3/1/23
Better Together Physician Coaching
Professional group coaching for medical trainees. A 6 month, online, group, positive psychology based coaching program for wellness.
Control Group
Control group - no coaching intervention from 9/1/2022-3/1/23.
(They will receive the coaching intervention after study completion from 3/1/23-9/1/23)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Better Together Physician Coaching
Professional group coaching for medical trainees. A 6 month, online, group, positive psychology based coaching program for wellness.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Identify as female (including trans women, as well as those who identify as gender non-conforming, non-binary, and gender-queer).
Exclusion Criteria
* Those who do not identify as female (including trans women, as well as those who identify as gender non-conforming, non-binary, and gender-queer).
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tyra Fainstad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Villwock JA, Sobin LB, Koester LA, Harris TM. Impostor syndrome and burnout among American medical students: a pilot study. Int J Med Educ. 2016 Oct 31;7:364-369. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5801.eac4.
Pommier E, Neff KD, Toth-Kiraly I. The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):21-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191119874108. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Mantri S, Lawson JM, Wang Z, Koenig HG. Identifying Moral Injury in Healthcare Professionals: The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP. J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2323-2340. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01065-w.
Dahlin ME, Runeson B. Burnout and psychiatric morbidity among medical students entering clinical training: a three year prospective questionnaire and interview-based study. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Apr 12;7:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-6.
Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Gill PR, Satele DV, West CP. Effect of a Professional Coaching Intervention on the Well-being and Distress of Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1406-1414. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2425.
Palamara K, Chu JT, Chang Y, Yu L, Cosco D, Higgins S, Tulsky A, Mourad R, Singh S, Steinhauser K, Donelan K. Who Benefits Most? A Multisite Study of Coaching and Resident Well-being. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):539-547. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06903-5. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Gazelle G, Liebschutz JM, Riess H. Physician burnout: coaching a way out. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):508-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3144-y. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
Abedini NC, Stack SW, Goodman JL, Steinberg KP. "It's Not Just Time Off": A Framework for Understanding Factors Promoting Recovery From Burnout Among Internal Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Feb;10(1):26-32. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00440.1.
Shaikh AA, Shaikh A, Kumar R, Tahir A. Assessment of Burnout and its Factors Among Doctors Using the Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory. Cureus. 2019 Feb 19;11(2):e4101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4101.
Mann A, Shah AN, Thibodeau PS, Dyrbye L, Syed A, Woodward MA, Thurmon K, Jones CD, Dunbar KS, Fainstad T. Online Well-Being Group Coaching Program for Women Physician Trainees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2335541. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35541.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-0028
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.