The Role of Dopamine, Reward Learning and Prefrontal Activity in Expectation-induced Mood Enhancement

NCT ID: NCT05208294

Last Updated: 2024-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

297 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-09

Study Completion Date

2023-09-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although placebo effects on depressive symptoms are well documented, the underlying mechanisms and moderating factors of expectation effects on mood and depression are poorly understood. Various studies show reduced reward processing in clinical and subclinical depression, presumably due to abnormalities in the dopamine (DA) system. Here, the investigators will test whether expectation-induced mood enhancement is mediated by endogenous DA activity and reward learning, and moderated by individual differences in depression-related personality traits. Healthy participants (N=296) will be tested for potentially relevant personality traits and given an inactive substance (placebo) or a DA D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride (400 mg) in combination with a low vs. high expectation manipulation (fully crossed 2x2 placebo design) before performing a probabilistic reinforcement learning task, an effort expenditure task, and undergo a depressed mood induction procedure. Further, EEG indices will be assessed throughout the tasks.

The investigators expect that positive expectation improves participants' reinforcement learning, increases participants' willingness to make effort in order to obtain reward, and leads to less depressive symptoms as indicated by mood ratings upon depressive mood induction. If the overall effect of positive expectations is mediated by DA, high-dose sulpiride should block expectation-induced effects, i.e., the anticipated enhanced reinforcement learning and effort expenditure as well as mood improvement in the high vs. low expectation group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The placebo effect, i.e., raising expectations towards a successful treatment by applying an inactive substance, reportedly improves therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials. Although there is supporting evidence for the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) and reinforcement learning, i.e. learning from reward and punishment, to mediate this effect, to the knowledge of the authors, no study has tested these underpinnings yet. The objective of the present project is to investigate whether expectation-induced mood enhancement is mediated by DA activity and reward learning, and moderated by individual differences in depression-related personality traits. To this end, participants will be told to either receive a placebo (low expectation) or a medicine which is labeled as antidepressant (high expectation) that improves mood. Orthogonal to this expectation manipulation, participants actually receive either 400 mg of sulpiride (sulpiride group) or a placebo (inactive substance group). Sulpiride is a selective D2-recptor antagonist which presumably elevates DA levels in low doses and has been used as an antidepressant. However, as a part of the high expectation group's expectation manipulation, while participants are told to receive an antidepressant, the sulpiride group actually receives a dose that is presumably too high to increase DA levels and produce antidepressant effects. Rather, 400mg of sulpirid presumably leads to a blockade of dopamine receptors and may thereby block expectation placebo effects. Participants then undergo three tasks, in which behavioral and computational markers of reinforcement learning and willingness to make effort in order to obtain reward are investigated. Further, mood ratings upon depressive mood induction will be assessed. In addition to participants behavioral responses, EEG indices will be recorded throughout the tasks. Prior to testing, participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires with regard to personality traits as well as reward response. In order to assess dopamine-related plasma prolactin, the study physician will draw one blood sample (ca. 8 ml) at the beginning of the testing session (at approximately 9 a.m.) and one hour after substance intake (at approximately 10 a.m.), which presumably corresponds with the latency of the peak of the prolactin response to sulpiride. Saliva and gene samples will be collected for hypotheses that are tested in the context of the overarching collaborative research center 289 and preregistered elsewhere.

It is expected that positive expectation improves participants' reinforcement learning, increases participants' willingness to make effort in order to obtain reward, and leads to less depressive symptoms as indicated by mood ratings upon depressive mood induction. If the overall effect of positive expectations is mediated by DA, high-dose sulpiride should block expectation-induced effects, i.e., the anticipated enhanced reinforcement learning and effort expenditure as well as mood improvement in the high vs. low expectation group.

Hypotheses:

1. Expectation enhancement (high vs. low) within the placebo group is associated with lower negative mood ratings after the mood induction procedure.
2. Expectation enhancement (high vs. low) within the placebo group enhances computationally modeled reward learning parameters and EEG markers of reward processing during the reinforcement learning task.
3. Within the placebo group, the expectation effect on negative mood ratings mentioned in (1) is correlated with the expectation effect on reward learning parameters in the probabilistic reinforcement learning task mentioned in (2).
4. Across the two expectation groups and within the placebo group, reward learning parameters and electrophysiological markers of reward processing are positively correlated with questionnaire measures of agentic extraversion (and negatively with self-reported depressive symptoms).
5. In the sulpiride group, the effects described in (1), (2), and (3) are lower than in the placebo group.
6. The prolactin response to sulpiride is correlated with the magnitude of expectation effects on reinforcement learning, negative mood, and self-reported agentic extraversion as well as depressive symptoms.
7. High levels of the personality trait agentic extraversion (and low levels of depressive symptoms) are associated with higher expectancy effects on negative mood.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Placebo Effect on Mood Improvement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A fully crossed 2x2 placebo design will be employed by giving participants either a placebo or a sulpiride capsule in combination with a low vs. high expectation manipulation.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Participants will be blinded to the actual substance groups. In order to carry out the expectation manipulation, the clinician scientists will provide participants with substance information that is unrelated to the actual substance that is received by the participants. Hence the clinician scientists are blind to the actual substance (double blind design). Other than providing (invalid) substance information (i.e. the expectation manipulation) and drawing blood samples, the study clinicians do not take part in the remaining experimental procedure. The investigators who accompany participants throughout the experimental procedure are not aware of participants' true substance and expectation allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High expectation with sulpiride group

Prior to the experimental procedure, participants are told by the study clinicians that an antidepressant sulpiride capsule is administrated, while participants actually receive a sulpiride 400mg-capsule (note that the dose is presumably too high to produce antidepressant effects).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulpiride 400 MG

Intervention Type DRUG

The substituted benzamide sulpiride is a selective D2-receptor antagonist that is generally well tolerated and has a low affinity to histaminergic, cholinergic, serotonergic, adrenergic, or GABA receptors. Sulpiride is slowly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and peak serum levels occur at 3 hours . In low doses (50-200 mg), sulpiride presumably blocks presynaptic autoreceptors, thereby elevating DA levels and reducing depressive symptoms, whereas higher doses lead to a predominant blockade of postsynaptic receptors. The dose in the present study (400 mg) is sufficient for behaviorally relevant modulations of dopaminergic processing with minimal risk of side effects. Note that participants in the sulpiride group actually receive a dose that is presumably too high to produce antidepressant effects.

High expectation manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an antidepressive sulpiride capsule is administrated.

High expectation with placebo group

Prior to the experimental procedure, participants are told by the study clinicians that an antidepressant sulpiride capsule is administrated, while participants actually receive a placebo capsule.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants receive an inactive placebo capsule.

High expectation manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an antidepressive sulpiride capsule is administrated.

Low expectation with sulpiride group

Prior to the experimental procedure, participants are told by the study clinicians that an inactive placebo capsule is administrated, while participants actually receive a sulpiride capsule (400 mg).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulpiride 400 MG

Intervention Type DRUG

The substituted benzamide sulpiride is a selective D2-receptor antagonist that is generally well tolerated and has a low affinity to histaminergic, cholinergic, serotonergic, adrenergic, or GABA receptors. Sulpiride is slowly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and peak serum levels occur at 3 hours . In low doses (50-200 mg), sulpiride presumably blocks presynaptic autoreceptors, thereby elevating DA levels and reducing depressive symptoms, whereas higher doses lead to a predominant blockade of postsynaptic receptors. The dose in the present study (400 mg) is sufficient for behaviorally relevant modulations of dopaminergic processing with minimal risk of side effects. Note that participants in the sulpiride group actually receive a dose that is presumably too high to produce antidepressant effects.

Low expectation manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an inactive placebo capsule is administrated.

Low expectation with placebo group

Prior to the experimental procedure, participants are told by the study clinicians that an inactive placebo capsule is administrated, and participants actually receive a placebo capsule.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants receive an inactive placebo capsule.

Low expectation manipulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an inactive placebo capsule is administrated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulpiride 400 MG

The substituted benzamide sulpiride is a selective D2-receptor antagonist that is generally well tolerated and has a low affinity to histaminergic, cholinergic, serotonergic, adrenergic, or GABA receptors. Sulpiride is slowly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and peak serum levels occur at 3 hours . In low doses (50-200 mg), sulpiride presumably blocks presynaptic autoreceptors, thereby elevating DA levels and reducing depressive symptoms, whereas higher doses lead to a predominant blockade of postsynaptic receptors. The dose in the present study (400 mg) is sufficient for behaviorally relevant modulations of dopaminergic processing with minimal risk of side effects. Note that participants in the sulpiride group actually receive a dose that is presumably too high to produce antidepressant effects.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Participants receive an inactive placebo capsule.

Intervention Type DRUG

High expectation manipulation

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an antidepressive sulpiride capsule is administrated.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Low expectation manipulation

Participants will be told by the study clinicians that an inactive placebo capsule is administrated.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Right-handed
* Aged 18-60 years
* German native speaker
* Informed consent
* Normal or corrected sight

Exclusion Criteria

* Current pregnancy
* Current or history of general medical, neurological or psychological disorders, which preclude sulpiride intake
* Self-reported presence of mental disorders
* Liver, kidney, and bowel disorders
* Regular smoking
* Reported alcohol abuse
* Illegal drug intake
* Regular drug intake by prescription in the past three months
* Dreadlocks
* BMI \< 19 or \> 30
* Unremovable metal objects around the head
* Previous knowledge of Japanese characters
* Excessive caffeine intake (\> 8 cups per day)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philipps University Marburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erik Müller

Professor of Personality Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik M Mueller, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Philipps University Marburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Psychology, Differential Psychology and Personality Research, Philipps-University of Marburg

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRC 289 Projekt A07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement
NCT01684306 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Learning and Decision-making
NCT06014606 COMPLETED NA
LSD-Perceptual-Choice-Study
NCT05976698 COMPLETED NA
Behavior Brain Responses
NCT03964350 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Drug Effects on Interpersonal Interaction
NCT05123716 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1