Documentation of Efficacy of Intralymphatic Allergen Immunotherapy
NCT ID: NCT05191186
Last Updated: 2025-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
450 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Is Intralymphatic Allergen Immunotherapy Effective and Safe?
NCT04210193
Effect of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy
NCT02255604
Grass Pollen Immunotherapy Using a Cluster Regime for Seasonal Rhinitis and Asthma
NCT00135642
Factors Predicting Efficacy of Allergen Injection Immunotherapy for Grass Pollen Hayfever
NCT00135629
Immunological Comparison of AIT and SCIT Immunotherapy Against Grass Pollen
NCT01889875
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary endpoint is the difference in combined symptom and medication score during grass pollen seasons following treatment compared with patients receiving placebo.
Injections are giving ultrasound-guided with at least 4 weeks intervals.
To increase trial retention, two studies within the trial are conducted: a feasibility study assessing the acceptability and feasibility of a digital intervention and its evaluation design. Outcomes include participant and stakeholder acceptability, reach, mechanisms of change to improve trial retention, utilization, unintended effects, software functionality, recruitment and retention rates, questionnaire suitability, randomization feasibility, power for a future definitive trial, and initial efficacy signals. Additionally, an evaluation study assesses the efficacy of the intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
grass pollen extract treatment
participants receive 3 injections with Alutard phleum pratense, ALK, grass pollen extract
Grass pollen extract - Alutard Phleum pratense, ALK
injection in lymph node
Placebo
Participants receive 3 injections with saline (NaCl 0.9%)
Grass pollen extract - Alutard Phleum pratense, ALK
injection in lymph node
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Grass pollen extract - Alutard Phleum pratense, ALK
injection in lymph node
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* positive skin prick test for grass pollen extract
Exclusion Criteria
* previous AIT for grass pollen allergy
* uncontrolled non-allergic upper airways disease
* uncontrolled asthma
* planned depot steroid injections during season
* uncontrolled autoimmune diseases
* active malignancies
* uncontrolled other severe condition, including psychiatric diseases
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
University Hospital, Linkoeping
OTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johannes Martin Schmid
Consultant, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johannes M Schmid, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Central Region, Denmark
Linkoeping University Hospital
Linköping, Oestergotland, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Petersen AP, Schmid JM, Hoffmann HJ, Finderup J. Acceptability and feasibility of a need-supportive intervention to increase trial retention: a randomised feasibility study within a randomised controlled allergy trial in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 14;15(9):e101046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101046.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
project homepage
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-001060-28
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.