Safety of Lymph Node Injection for Allergen Immunotherapy

NCT ID: NCT01982474

Last Updated: 2016-02-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: PHASE1
• Total Enrollment: 18 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2016-12-31

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine safety of allergy immunotherapy lymph node injections for grass pollen allergies.

Detailed Description

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been used in the treatment of allergic disease for over one hundred years. SIT for environmental allergies consists of allergen extracts that have been traditionally administered by subcutaneous or sublingual routes to both children and adults. In the United States, subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is currently the only FDA-approved route of administration for allergenic extracts. In recent years, a novel method of administering allergen immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT), has been developed, which has shown to be safer, more efficacious, and less painful than traditional SCIT. ILIT can dramatically decrease treatment time from 3 - 5 years to 8 weeks. It has only been studied in European adults. The aim of this project is to study efficacy and safety of intralymphatic immunotherapy in adolescents and young adults with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, using currently available allergen extracts. Patients with clinical history suspicious for rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis, correlating with positive allergy skin and/or blood tests to grass pollen, will be randomized to either placebo (normal saline) or treatment (Center-Al grass pollen extract) arms. A total of 3 injections over eight weeks will be administered intralymphatically. A third arm will include an observational group of grass-allergic subjects already receiving SCIT for 1 year. Primary outcome will be comparison of a safety score between arms 1 and 2. We will follow adverse events, as well as serum markers for Th2 and Th1 phenotypes, and objective respiratory measures (spirometry and FeNO) in those with asthma. Visits will occur at baseline for screening/enrollment, on day 0/week4/week 8 for injections (injection visit for arms 1 and 2 only), and for follow-up at 12 weeks and near end of grass pollen season. A substudy will evaluate participants one-year after completing ILIT injections by obtaining repeat serum biomarker levels and interval change in medical history. Results could help in dramatically decreasing treatment time, as well as increasing safety of allergen immunotherapy.

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: QUADRUPLE

Study Groups

Grass pollen extract injection

Grass pollen extract injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Grass pollen extract

Intervention Type: BIOLOGICAL

Grass pollen extract injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Placebo injection

Normal saline injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Group Type: PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo injection

Intervention Type: OTHER

Normal saline injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Observational group

Subjects already receiving traditional subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy for grass pollen, being observed for safety of their subcutaneous injections. Not receiving active intervention during this study.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Grass pollen extract

Grass pollen extract injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Intervention Type: BIOLOGICAL

Placebo injection

Normal saline injected intralymphatically q 4 weeks x 3

Intervention Type: OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Age 15-24 years
• Bothersome nasal, ocular, and/or respiratory symptoms correlating with grass pollen season (summer)
• Grass pollen allergic (+ skin prick test [wheal ≥ 3 mm larger than negative control] or specific IgE [minimum 0.35 kU/L] to grass pollen [Timothy or a northern pasture grass mix containing Timothy])
• Informed consent obtained and signed
• Informed assent (as appropriate) obtained and signed
• Understanding of study procedures
• Ability to comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study
• For inclusion in observational group (arm 3), must have initiated SCIT containing grass pollen 12 - 18 months prior to grass pollen season 2014 (ex. started SCIT any time Dec 2012 - May 2013). This group was included for comparison between traditional IT and ILIT, and these subjects will continue SCIT during this study. Since patients undergoing SCIT may not see clinical response to therapy until 12 months, we selected this time point to better compare with the more rapid immunologic and clinical changes expected with ILIT.

Exclusion Criteria

• Significant year-round allergy symptoms and year-round symptoms without worsening during grass pollen season (summer). (Exception: intermittent year-round symptoms with significant worsening during summer is acceptable for inclusion).
• Blood donation or surgery within the previous 30 days of baseline/enrollment, visit #1.
• Use of investigational drugs within the previous 90 days
• Pregnancy or nursing
• Mastocytosis
• Significant cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, autoimmune, hematological, or active infectious disease
• History of malignancy, hypertension, use of immunosuppressive agents, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, or tricyclic antidepressants
• Pulmonary disease, including moderate to severe, perennial asthma (FEV1 < 80% predicted) and perennial use of inhaled corticosteroids (exception: seasonal allergic asthma will not be excluded)
• Previous IT (exception: those in observational arm currently on grass SCIT).
• No readily accessible inguinal lymph nodes

• Minimum Eligible Age: 15 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 24 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Nationwide Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Amber Patterson

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Amber Patterson

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Amber M Patterson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Locations

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Countries

United States

References

Senti G, Crameri R, Kuster D, Johansen P, Martinez-Gomez JM, Graf N, Steiner M, Hothorn LA, Gronlund H, Tivig C, Zaleska A, Soyer O, van Hage M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Rose H, Kundig TM. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for cat allergy induces tolerance after only 3 injections. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 May;129(5):1290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22464647 (View on PubMed)

Senti G, Prinz Vavricka BM, Erdmann I, Diaz MI, Markus R, McCormack SJ, Simard JJ, Wuthrich B, Crameri R, Graf N, Johansen P, Kundig TM. Intralymphatic allergen administration renders specific immunotherapy faster and safer: a randomized controlled trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17908-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803725105. Epub 2008 Nov 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19001265 (View on PubMed)

Hylander T, Latif L, Petersson-Westin U, Cardell LO. Intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy: an effective and safe alternative treatment route for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.056.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23374268 (View on PubMed)

Patterson AM, Bonny AE, Shiels WE 2nd, Erwin EA. Three-injection intralymphatic immunotherapy in adolescents and young adults with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Feb;116(2):168-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Dec 17. No abstract available.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 26706294 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

IRB13-00409

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id