Vestibular Versus Sublingual Route of AIT Tablets

NCT ID: NCT05119751

Last Updated: 2022-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

172 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-25

Study Completion Date

2022-04-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the tolerability of the vestibular administration route of birch pollen, grass pollen, ragweed pollen, and house dust mite (HDM) AIT tablets compared with the sublingual route in adult subjects with allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis (AR/C)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single-center randomised controlled pilot trial conducted in Canada. Subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive vestibular or sublingual birch pollen, grass pollen, ragweed pollen, or HDM AIT in tablet form for 28±4 days, followed by 28±4 days of sublingual administration only. The ratio will be \~ 1:1:1:1 for tree-, grass-, ragweed-pollen and HDM AIT tablet treatments, with a minimum of 30 patients in each allergen group for a total of approximately 200 randomised subjects.

Adults (18-65 years of age) who demonstrate birch, grass, ragweed, or HDM allergen skin prick test (SPT) positivity and with a history of birch pollen-, grass pollen-, ragweed pollen-, or HDM allergen-induced AR/C, with or without asthma are eligible for the trial.

Data for the primary endpoint of severity of treatment-related AEs will be collected during the first 28±4 days of treatment. The trial consists of 3 trial periods: a screening period (up to 12 weeks), a randomised two-arm treatment period of 28±4 days, and a single-arm sublingual treatment follow-up period of 28±4 days.

Screening period: Subjects will be evaluated based on eligibility criteria at visit 1 (V1).

Treatment period: the randomisation visit will be performed (V2) and eligible subjects randomised in a 1:1 ratio to vestibular or sublingual AIT tablet with the appropriate allergen for their allergen sensitization. At day 28±4, a visit will be conducted (V3) for all subjects previously receiving vestibular AIT to be switched to sublingual AIT with the appropriate allergen for their allergen sensitization. Subjects previously receiving sublingual AIT will remain on their previous treatment. All subjects will discontinue treatment after 56±8 days on treatment (V4). Subjects who would like to continue the sublingual immunotherapy tablets will be permitted to do so based on physician judgment and own expense but will no longer be part of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypersensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

First month of treatment is taken the vestibular route and the following the sublingual
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Birch allergy

randomised (1:1) to receive vestibular or sublingual birch pollen

once daily tree 12 SQ-Bet AIT tablet

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tree 12 SQ-Bet

Intervention Type DRUG

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Grass allergy

randomised (1:1) to receive vestibular or sublingual grass pollen

grass 2800 BAU AIT tablet

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GRASS 2800 BAU

Intervention Type DRUG

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

ragweed allergy

randomised (1:1) to receive vestibular or sublingual ragweed pollen ragweed 12 Amb a 1-U AIT Tablet

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RAGWEED 12 AMB A 1-U

Intervention Type DRUG

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

House dust mite allergy

randomised (1:1) to receive vestibular or sublingual HDM

HDM 12 SQ-HDM

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HDM 12 SQ-HDM

Intervention Type DRUG

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tree 12 SQ-Bet

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Intervention Type DRUG

GRASS 2800 BAU

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Intervention Type DRUG

RAGWEED 12 AMB A 1-U

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Intervention Type DRUG

HDM 12 SQ-HDM

DAILY DOSE OF AIT TABLET

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ITULATEK GRASTEK RAGWITEK ACARIZAX

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent obtained before any trial related procedures are performed

* Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged 18-65 years at the time of signing the informed consent
* A clinically relevant history of birch pollen-, grass pollen-, ragweed pollen-, or HDM allergen-induced AR/C with or without asthma requiring treatment during the respective allergen season for birch pollen, grass pollen, or ragweed pollen, or perennial AR/C for HDM.
* Positive SPT (5 mm wheal size or greater) to birch pollen, timothy grass pollen, ragweed pollen, or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/farinae within the previous 12 months
* A device with daily access to the internet

Exclusion Criteria

* • Previous SLIT-tablet treatment

* Subcutaneous AIT treatment for the sensitized allergen within less than 5 years of screening
* Severe acute or chronic oral inflammation. Subjects with acute oral inflammation may be randomised when the condition has been resolved
* A history or diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis
* A relevant history of systemic allergic reaction e.g. anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory symptoms, generalised urticaria or severe facial angioedema that in the opinion of the investigator may constitute an increased safety concern
* Unstable, severe asthma (FEV1 \<70% of predicted value after adequate pharmacologic treatment) at randomisation
* Currently taking beta-blockers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ALK-Abelló A/S

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Clinique Spécialisée en Allergies de la Capitale

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Remi Gagnon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinique Spécialisée en Allergies de la Capitale

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique specialisee en allergie de la capitale

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIT4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

House Dust Mite Allergy Trial In Children
NCT04145219 COMPLETED PHASE3