Grass Pollen Immunotherapy Using a Cluster Regime for Seasonal Rhinitis and Asthma
NCT ID: NCT00135642
Last Updated: 2023-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1996-02-29
1998-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Factors Predicting Efficacy of Allergen Injection Immunotherapy for Grass Pollen Hayfever
NCT00135629
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Treatment for Patients With Hypersensitivity to Grass Pollen
NCT00916422
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation for the Treatment of Allergy Against Grass and Olive Pollen
NCT04891237
Documentation of Efficacy of Intralymphatic Allergen Immunotherapy
NCT05191186
Changes in the Immune Response and Skin Reactivity of Grass Pollen Allergic Patients Treated With ALK Grass Tablets
NCT00413556
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Results: Significant reductions were observed in immunotherapy group compared with the placebo group in hay fever symptoms (49%, 15%: P = 0.1), medication scores (80%, 18%; P=.007), and seasonal chest symptoms (90%, 11%; P \< .05). Impairment of overall quality of life (mean score of 7 domains) during the pollen season was less in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group (median difference \[95% CI\], 0.8 \[0.18-1.5\]; P=.05=2\]. During the pollen season, there was no change in airway methacholine PC20 (provocation concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1) in the immunotherapy-treated group (P=5), compared with an almost 3 doubling-dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P=.5), compared with an almost 3 doubling dose decrease in the placebo-treated group (P=.01, between-group difference). There were no significant local or systemic side effects during the study.
Conclusion: Grass pollen immunotherapy improves quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis and reduces seasonal asthma symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
Note: Ongoing mechanistic studies and nasal biopsies studies until 2008
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subcutaneous Alutard SQ grass pollen (Phleum pratense)
Venepuncture: 20 ml blood sample taken on 2 separate visits
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent obtained before entering the trial
* A clinical history of grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis of two years or more requiring treatment during the grass pollen season
* A clinical history of severe rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (interfering with usual daily activities or sleep), which remain troublesome despite treatment with anti-allergic drugs during the grass pollen season
* Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT) response (wheal diameter ≥ 5 mm) to Phleum pratense
* Positive specific IgE against Phleum pratense (≥ IgE Class 2)
* Physical examination with no clinically relevant findings
* If pre-menopausal female of childbearing potential, the subject must test negative on standard urine pregnancy test and must be willing to practice appropriate contraceptive methods for the duration of the trial
* Patients with seasonal asthma only if their baseline methacholine PC20 was greater than 2 mg/mL (normal range \> 16 mg/ mL)
* Willingness to comply with this protocol
Exclusion Criteria
* A clinical history of symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or asthma due to tree pollen or weed pollen adjacent to the start of - and potentially overlapping - the grass pollen season
* A clinical history of significant symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the subject is regularly exposed
* A clinical history of significant recurrent acute sinusitis (defined as 2 episodes per year for the last two years all of which required antibiotic treatment) or chronic sinusitis
* At randomisation, current symptoms of, or treatment for, upper respiratory tract infection, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media or other relevant infectious process (serous otitis media is not an exclusion criterion)
* History of emergency visit or admission for asthma in the previous 12 months
* Use of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening
* Previous treatment by immunotherapy with grass pollen allergen or any other allergen within the previous 5 years
* History of anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic food allergy, bee venom anaphylaxis, exercise anaphylaxis or drug induced anaphylaxis
* History of angioedema
* Any of the following underlying conditions known or suspected to be present:
* Cystic fibrosis
* Malignancy
* Insulin-dependent diabetes
* Malabsorption or malnutrition
* Renal or hepatic insufficiency
* Chronic infection
* Drug dependency or alcoholism
* Ischemic heart disease or angina requiring current daily medication or with any evidence of disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the protocol results difficult or jeopardising the safety of the subject (e.g. clinically significant cardiovascular, serious immunopathologic, immunodeficiency whether acquired or not, hepatic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, or other major systemic disease)
* Immunosuppressive treatment
* History of hypersensitivity to the excipients of the trial medications
* History of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to trial medications or rescue medications
* A mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the trial, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
* Unlikely to be able to complete the trial, for any reason, or likely to travel for extended periods of time during the grass pollen season
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ALK-Abelló A/S
INDUSTRY
Imperial College London
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen R Durham, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Brompton Hospital, NHLI Imperial College London United Kingdom
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Brompton Hospital, NHLI Imperial College
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DHRG-CLUSTER
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.