Comparison of IntraArticular Platelet-Rich-Plasma to Corticosteroid Injections for Patients With Zygapophyseal Joint (Z-Joint) Low Back Pain Confirmed by Dual Intra-Articular Local Anesthetic Injections

NCT ID: NCT05188820

Last Updated: 2024-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of IntraArticular Platelet-Rich-Plasma to Corticosteroid Injections for Patients with Zygapophyseal Joint (Z-Joint) Low Back Pain Confirmed by Dual Intra-Articular Local Anesthetic Injections: A Triple Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Abstract/Project Summary Background: Zygapophyseal joint (Z-joint) pain represents up to 40% of lower back pain (LBP), a very common and disabling health issue. There are currently two treatment options for patients with Z-joint LBP unresponsive to conservative treatment: corticosteroid (CS) injections and radiofrequency ablation. CS injection is a shorter, less invasive and readily available procedure. Despite its accepted use, it has not shown its efficacy over placebo.

The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been investigated for LBP treatment. PRP injection has the same advantages as CS and recent studies suggest that PRP injections are more effective than cortisone from two to six months post treatment. However, no blinded controlled trials have compared these two treatments, and no data is available on the efficacy of PRP after six months for LBP treatment.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of intra-articular leucocyte poor (LP) PRP to CS injections on pain, function and quality-of-life at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12month post treatment. The two main outcomes will be the ODI score improvement and the proportion of participants who needs a second injection in each group at one year post treatment.

Study Design: Triple-blinded randomized controlled trial Patient Sample: Fifty participants with radiological signs of osteoarthritis and Z-Joint LBP confirmed by dual intra-articular local anesthetic injections will be recruited and randomized in two groups: CS and LP-PRP injection groups.

Method: Participants will be assessed in person, by mail or by phone at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12-months post-treatment by a blinded evaluator. Pain will be assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) when bending over, function by the Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (ODI), quality of life by the SF36 questionnaire and satisfaction by the Modified McNabb Scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Platelet Rich Plasma Zygapophyseal Joint Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study Design: Triple-blinded randomized controlled trial Patient Sample: Fifty participants with radiological signs of osteoarthritis and Z-Joint LBP confirmed by dual intra-articular local anesthetic injections will be recruited and randomized in two groups: CS and LP-PRP injection groups.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Corticosteroid group

Patients will receive intra-articular z-joint injection of cortisone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cortisone injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Facet block using cortisone

PRP group

Patients will receive intra-articular z-joint injection of PRP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PRP - platelet rich plasma injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Facet block using PRP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PRP - platelet rich plasma injection

Facet block using PRP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cortisone injection

Facet block using cortisone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- 40 years old or more; given the low prevalence of facet pain in younger adults
* LBP present for more than six months, with an axial predominance
* Persistent LBP after three months of non-interventional treatment
* Pretreatment ODI score of at least 30/100 (moderate disability associated with LBP)
* Pretreatment LBP VAS of at least 4/10
* 80% LBP reduction 30 minutes after 2 intra-articular diagnostic blocs with Xylocaine and Marcaine
* Radiological signs of facet joint degeneration (on X-rays, CT Scan or MRI)
* Absence of neurological deficit
* Sufficient knowledge of French or English to complete the questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Less than 40 years old
* Failure to achieve intra-articular diagnostic block
* Intra-articular injection of CS 3 months or less before recruitment
* Oral corticosteroid use in the last two weeks
* Inflammatory disease
* Systemic infection
* Infection at injection site
* Vertebral fracture
* Spine tumour
* Surgical intervention at injection site prior to the study or planned
* Cognitive disorder that impairs the ability to answer the questionnaires
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* Coagulopathy affecting platelets
* Drug affecting platelets that cannot be stopped (except acetylsalicylic acid)
* Intolerance or allergies to local anesthetics, contrast agent, CS, and blood products
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Spine Intervention Society

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Association Québécoise Médecine Sportive et Exercice

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hopsitalier Université de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cauchon AM, Mares C, Fan XY, Bois MC, Hagemeister N, Noiseux N, Roy A. Comparing the efficacy of intra-articular injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) with corticosteroids (CS) in patients with chronic zygapophyseal joint low back pain confirmed by double intra-articular diagnostic blocks: A triple-blinded randomized multicentric controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. Interv Pain Med. 2024 Dec 3;3(4):100525. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100525. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39717452 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21.246

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intradiscal Platelet Rich Plasma
NCT04544709 TERMINATED PHASE4
Depo-Medrol on Psoas After LLIF
NCT05929755 RECRUITING PHASE4