Addition of FFRct in the Diagnostic Pathway of Patients With Stable Chest Pain

NCT ID: NCT05174247

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

528 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-27

Study Completion Date

2025-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Patients with stable chest pain enter a diagnostic pathway where Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is often the first line non-invasive test to detect coronary stenosis. An anatomically significant (≥ 50% luminal narrowing) stenosis on CCTA does however not always cause cardiac ischemia (i.e. hemodynamically significant stenosis). CCTA is often followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to assess the hemodynamic significance of the stenosis which is the key determinant to decide on treatment (revascularization by coronary stenting or surgery). CCTA has a very high negative predictive value but the positive predictive value is moderate. Hence, anatomically significant stenoses on CCTA often turn out not to be hemodynamically significant on ICA. Fractional Flow Reserve from coronary computed tomography (FFRct) analysis is a new non-invasive technique that uses the CCTA images as a basis for complex software based calculations and modelling to provide additional functional information based on the anatomical CCTA images. Thus, FFRct is a totally non-invasive method. Adding the FFRct analysis to the anatomical assessment of CCTA is expected to reduce the number of patients being referred to ICA where no signs of hemodynamically significant stenosis are found on ICA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the Netherlands, annually 180.000 new patients present with stable chest pain - the most common symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD) \[1\]. Stable chest pain has a 1.5% 1-year mortality and 0.7% incidence of myocardial infarction \[2\]. The "Kennisagenda" of the Dutch Societies of Radiology and Cardiology include CAD diagnosis as a top 10 priority.

Patients with stable chest pain enter a diagnostic pathway to detect or exclude significant coronary stenosis which is defined as \> 50% luminal narrowing.

The "Verbetersignalement pijn op de borst" published by the Zorginstituut, advocates that the diagnosis should be based on a single non-invasive first line test.

Based on the National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a good option as the first line test in low to intermediate risk patients.

CCTA is the most sensitive non-invasive technique available, but only provides anatomical information. CCTA has an excellent negative predictive value (99%), therefore CCTA can accurately rule out CAD. However the positive predictive value is moderate (64%). Hence, anatomically significant stenoses on CCTA often turn out not to be hemodynamically significant on ICA .

Patients with significant anatomical stenosis on CCTA are often referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to confirm the presence of a stenosis and subsequent revascularization of hemodynamically significant stenoses. To determine the latter, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements can be performed during ICA. In FFR, the pressure drop across an anatomical stenosis is measured, yielding a numerical value between 0 and 1, with 1 being normal and 0.80 considered a significant stenosis.

As with all invasive procedures, ICA is associated with morbidity, mortality, patient discomfort, time and costs. Due to the moderate specificity of CCTA, many patients referred for ICA turn out to not have hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis (28-41%) in Dutch populations.

To reduce the percentage of patients referred for ICA without significant CAD, the FFRct can be useful. FFRct is a non-invasive method that uses the already acquired CCTA images to calculate coronary FFR values as they would be expected if measured invasively.

Based on data of two randomised trials conducted in the Netherlands, around 20% of patients with chest pain referred for CCTA have at least 50% anatomical coronary stenosis on CCTA . Prior FFRct studies involved populations of different countries, with different risk and work-up There are no prospective data on the real-world use of FFRct in the Dutch population of stable chest pain patients with stenosis on CCTA. The effect of FFRct in reducing unnecessary ICA or other non-invasive tests compared to CCTA alone in the Dutch health care situation is unknown. Evidence in the specific Dutch situation and population is needed to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness in the Dutch healthcare system.

The FUSION study is a randomized controlled trial which will investigate the impact of adding the FFRct analysis in the diagnostic pathway of stable chest pain on the rate of unnecessary ICA's.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Pain Epicardial Plaques

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The intervention group (FFRct group)

The people in this group receive an FFRct analysis, which will be included in the treatment plan. If the FFRct analysis shows that there are there is no significant narrowing in your case, then in principle no invasive examination (heart catheterization) performed. If the analysis indicates a significant narrowing, then an invasive cardiac catheterization will usually be required are carried out. The final treatment plan will always be reviewed by your doctor tailored to your individual situation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FFRct analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Software analysis of Cardiac CT to show extent of pericardial stenoses

Standard treatment not using result of FFRct analyses

The people in this group receive the regular treatment. This is usually an invasive cardiac catheterization. The additional FFRct analysis is also included in this group, but it is not included in the treatment plan.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FFRct analysis

Software analysis of Cardiac CT to show extent of pericardial stenoses

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Stable chest pain and the patient underwent CCTA which demonstrated ≥50% but less than 90% stenosis in any major epicardial vessel with a diameter ≥ 2 mm.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent
* Unstable angina according to ESC guidelines
* Unstable clinical status
* Expected inability to complete follow-up and comply with follow-up aspects of the protocol
* History of coronary revascularisation
* Non-invasive or invasive diagnostic testing for CAD within the past 12 months (with the exception of exercise ECG)
* Unsuitable for revascularisation if required (for example due to comorbidities or anatomical features)
* Poor CT quality with expected inability to perform FFRct analysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

S.P. Sharma

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ricardo PJ Budde, MD PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Alexander Hirsch, MD PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasmusmc

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Simran Sharma, MD

Role: CONTACT

+317030420

Laurens Groenendijk

Role: CONTACT

+31107033612

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Laurens Groenendijk

Role: primary

31 10 7033612

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC-2021-0189

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

FAMOUS-NSTEMI MRI Sub-Study
NCT02073422 COMPLETED