Addition of FFRct in the Diagnostic Pathway of Patients With Stable Chest Pain
NCT ID: NCT05174247
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
528 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-27
2025-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve From Computed Tomography
NCT01747317
Application of speCtraL Computed tomogrAphy to impRove specIficity of Cardiac compuTed tomographY
NCT03139006
Machine leArning Based CT angiograpHy derIved FFR: a Multi-ceNtEr, Registry
NCT02805621
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Combined With CT-FFR in Intermediate-Risk Chest Pain Patients.
NCT07140419
The Evaluation of the Roles of New Cardiac Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain
NCT03800862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with stable chest pain enter a diagnostic pathway to detect or exclude significant coronary stenosis which is defined as \> 50% luminal narrowing.
The "Verbetersignalement pijn op de borst" published by the Zorginstituut, advocates that the diagnosis should be based on a single non-invasive first line test.
Based on the National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is a good option as the first line test in low to intermediate risk patients.
CCTA is the most sensitive non-invasive technique available, but only provides anatomical information. CCTA has an excellent negative predictive value (99%), therefore CCTA can accurately rule out CAD. However the positive predictive value is moderate (64%). Hence, anatomically significant stenoses on CCTA often turn out not to be hemodynamically significant on ICA .
Patients with significant anatomical stenosis on CCTA are often referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to confirm the presence of a stenosis and subsequent revascularization of hemodynamically significant stenoses. To determine the latter, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements can be performed during ICA. In FFR, the pressure drop across an anatomical stenosis is measured, yielding a numerical value between 0 and 1, with 1 being normal and 0.80 considered a significant stenosis.
As with all invasive procedures, ICA is associated with morbidity, mortality, patient discomfort, time and costs. Due to the moderate specificity of CCTA, many patients referred for ICA turn out to not have hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis (28-41%) in Dutch populations.
To reduce the percentage of patients referred for ICA without significant CAD, the FFRct can be useful. FFRct is a non-invasive method that uses the already acquired CCTA images to calculate coronary FFR values as they would be expected if measured invasively.
Based on data of two randomised trials conducted in the Netherlands, around 20% of patients with chest pain referred for CCTA have at least 50% anatomical coronary stenosis on CCTA . Prior FFRct studies involved populations of different countries, with different risk and work-up There are no prospective data on the real-world use of FFRct in the Dutch population of stable chest pain patients with stenosis on CCTA. The effect of FFRct in reducing unnecessary ICA or other non-invasive tests compared to CCTA alone in the Dutch health care situation is unknown. Evidence in the specific Dutch situation and population is needed to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness in the Dutch healthcare system.
The FUSION study is a randomized controlled trial which will investigate the impact of adding the FFRct analysis in the diagnostic pathway of stable chest pain on the rate of unnecessary ICA's.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The intervention group (FFRct group)
The people in this group receive an FFRct analysis, which will be included in the treatment plan. If the FFRct analysis shows that there are there is no significant narrowing in your case, then in principle no invasive examination (heart catheterization) performed. If the analysis indicates a significant narrowing, then an invasive cardiac catheterization will usually be required are carried out. The final treatment plan will always be reviewed by your doctor tailored to your individual situation
FFRct analysis
Software analysis of Cardiac CT to show extent of pericardial stenoses
Standard treatment not using result of FFRct analyses
The people in this group receive the regular treatment. This is usually an invasive cardiac catheterization. The additional FFRct analysis is also included in this group, but it is not included in the treatment plan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FFRct analysis
Software analysis of Cardiac CT to show extent of pericardial stenoses
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stable chest pain and the patient underwent CCTA which demonstrated ≥50% but less than 90% stenosis in any major epicardial vessel with a diameter ≥ 2 mm.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unstable angina according to ESC guidelines
* Unstable clinical status
* Expected inability to complete follow-up and comply with follow-up aspects of the protocol
* History of coronary revascularisation
* Non-invasive or invasive diagnostic testing for CAD within the past 12 months (with the exception of exercise ECG)
* Unsuitable for revascularisation if required (for example due to comorbidities or anatomical features)
* Poor CT quality with expected inability to perform FFRct analysis
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
S.P. Sharma
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ricardo PJ Budde, MD PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Alexander Hirsch, MD PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmusmc
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC-2021-0189
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.