68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for Imaging of FAP Expressing Cancer

NCT ID: NCT05160051

Last Updated: 2024-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-01

Study Completion Date

2024-03-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to explore the safety and tolerability as well as diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-46 for different FAP-expressing tumor entities by PET.

This study does not offer any treatment for patients with FAP-expressing carcinomas; therefore, patients will be offered state of the art therapeutic options. Routine surgery will be performed within 8 weeks after 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Endpoint:

Positive predictive value (PPV) on a per-region- and per-patient-basis of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET for detection of histopathology-FAPpositive tumor lesions, confirmed by histopathology/biopsy (reached for ≥ 75%).

Secondary Endpoints:

1. Association between 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET uptake intensity and histopathologic FAP expression
2. Sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET on a per-patient and per-region-basis for detection of histopathology-FAPpositive tumor lesions confirmed by histopathology/biopsy (separate for regional, extra-regional and distant locations)
3. Detection rate of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET versus previous standard imaging on a per-patient and per-region-basis for detection of tumor location, also stratified by tumor maker serum level
4. Sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET versus previous standard imaging on a per-patient and per-region-basis for detection of tumor lesions confirmed by combined histopathology/biopsy/follow-up imaging/clinical follow-up reference standard (separate for regional, extra-regional and distant locations)
5. Impact on management
6. Inter-reader reproducibility
7. Safety
8. Change in staging/prognostic groups

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tumor, Solid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Single application of 68Ga-68-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging to detect tumour tissue in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Scan

A single-center prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial. All eligible subjects undergo FAPI-PET Scan

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Scan

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

68Ga-FAPI-46 is a radiotracer that binds with high affinity to Fibroblast Activating Protein (FAP). FAP is physiologically expressed in many tissues during embryonic development, but in adults it is expressed only in the context of wound healing, fibrotic processes, and the stroma of many malignancies. Therefore, the study seeks to validate if 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET could be established as a diagnositc tool to detect solid tumors.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Scan

68Ga-FAPI-46 is a radiotracer that binds with high affinity to Fibroblast Activating Protein (FAP). FAP is physiologically expressed in many tissues during embryonic development, but in adults it is expressed only in the context of wound healing, fibrotic processes, and the stroma of many malignancies. Therefore, the study seeks to validate if 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET could be established as a diagnositc tool to detect solid tumors.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Proven or suspected tumor types: Breast, Colorectal, Endometrial, Esophageal, Glioma/GMB, Head and neck, Hepatocellular carcinoma, ,Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Neuroendocrine, NSCLC (Non small cell lung cancer), Ovarian, Pancreatic, Prostate, Renal cell carcinoma, Sarcoma, SCLC (Small cell lung cancer), Semimoma, Thyroid, Unknown primary, Other
2. At initial staging or re-staging of disease
3. At least one detectable tumor lesion with any diameter \>1 cm
4. Intended or performed surgery or biopsy of tumor within 8 weeks before or after enrollment
5. Age ≥18 years
6. Patient Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2.
7. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP), defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, can only be included after a confirmed menstrual period and a negative highly sensitive urine or serum pregnancy test within 24 h before radiopharmaceutical application.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient cannot give consent for the study
2. Patient cannot lie flat or tolerate 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET imaging
3. Prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) within 3 months of enrollment to tumor lesions intended for surgery or biopsy
4. Prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, biologic or targeted oncologic therapy within 3 months of enrollment
5. Unwillingness or inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures
6. History of disease or condition that may critically interfere with participation in this study at the discretion of the investigators
7. Pregnant, lactating, or breast-feeding women
8. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP), defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, are not allowed to participate in this study, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during the interventional period. Highly effective contraception methods include:

* True sexual abstinence: defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation methods), declaration of abstinence for the duration of exposure to IMP, and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
* Vasectomised partner is a highly effective birth control method if the partner is the sole sexual partner of the study participant and the vasectomised partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
* Bilateral tubal occlusion.
* Combined (estrogen- and progestogen-containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

* oral
* intravaginal
* transdermal
* Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:

* oral
* injectable
* implantable
* Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
9. Post-menopausal women are allowed to participate in this study. Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms), or six months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) levels \> 40mIU/mL or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy or hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks prior to screening. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential
10. Sexually active males must use a condom during intercourse during the interventional period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent delivery of the study compound via seminal fluid
11. QTcF \>470 msec for females and QTcF \>450 msec for males on screening electrocardiogram (ECG) or history of congenital long QT syndrome.
12. Known or expected hypersensitivity to 68Ga-68-FAPI-46 or any of the relevant excipients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Essen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Nuclear medicine, University hospital Essen

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pabst KM, Weber MM, Laschinsky C, Sandach P, Bartel T, Kuper AT, Kessler L, Trajkovic-Arsic M, Eckstein M, Gilman E, Nader M, Barbato F, Podleska LE, Hadaschik BA, Hamacher R, Kersting D, von Ostau N, von Tresckow B, Kaelberlah HP, Kesch C, Kuemmel S, Reinacher-Schick A, Schuler M, Siveke JT, Grunwald V, Herrmann K, Fendler WP. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET accuracy for cancer imaging with histopathology validation: a single-centre, single-arm, interventional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025 Sep;26(9):1204-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00299-2. Epub 2025 Aug 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40774265 (View on PubMed)

Watanabe M, Fendler WP, Grafe H, Hirmas N, Hamacher R, Lanzafame H, Pabst KM, Hautzel H, Aigner C, Kasper S, von Tresckow B, Stuschke M, Kummel S, Lugnier C, Hadaschik B, Grunwald V, Zarrad F, Kersting D, Siveke JT, Herrmann K, Weber M. Head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection of various tumors. Ann Nucl Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):255-265. doi: 10.1007/s12149-024-01993-7. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39443386 (View on PubMed)

Hirmas N, Hamacher R, Sraieb M, Kessler L, Pabst KM, Barbato F, Lanzafame H, Kasper S, Nader M, Kesch C, von Tresckow B, Hautzel H, Aigner C, Glas M, Stuschke M, Kummel S, Harter P, Lugnier C, Uhl W, Hadaschik B, Grunwald V, Siveke JT, Herrmann K, Fendler WP. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI Versus 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Various Malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2024 Mar 1;65(3):372-378. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266652. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38331453 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FAPI-PET Trial

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Malignant Tumors
NCT05034146 RECRUITING NA
Tracer Targeting FAP PET Imaging in Patients
NCT05691894 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT Scan in Imaging Patients With Sarcoma
NCT04457258 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1