Sucrase-isomaltase Deficiency as a Cause of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT05159115
Last Updated: 2022-02-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-14
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project will address the knowledge gap related to a possible association between SI deficiency and IBS by addressing two research questions that have never been answered before. We aim to:
1. Validate the 13C-labelled breath test as a diagnostic tool by assessing the strength of the association between the breath test and SI activity measured in duodenal biopsies
2. Use the 13C-labelled breath test in a randomized dietary crossover trial comparing a starch and sucrose reduced diet (SSRD) with the standard low-FODMAP diet in IBS patients, to evaluate whether SI activity is associated with dietary changes according to symptom severity and gut microbiota composition
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetic Carbohydrate Maldigestion As Model to Study Food Hypersensitivity Mechanism (WORK PACKAGE 2)
NCT06770907
Sucrase-Isomaltase (SI) Genes and Meal Load
NCT07309601
Comparison Between Low FODMAP and SSRD in IBS
NCT05192603
Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Low FODMAP Diet
NCT02188680
The Effects of FODMAPs in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT05182593
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study 1: Validation of the 13C-labelled breath test to diagnose sucrase-isomaltase deficiency
Background: In order to validate the 13C-sucrose breath test to diagnose SI deficiency, the test result must be compared to the "gold standard" method for diagnosis; i.e. measurements of enzyme activity from intestinal biopsies by "The Dahlquist Method", and a reference material must be established.
Objective: To compare results from the 13C-labelled breath test to enzyme activity measured in biopsies collected from the proximal small intestine in a limited patient group referred for a gastroscopic examination.
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Primary endpoint: SI activity as measured with a breath test and enzyme activity with assay of biopsy material.
Recruitment and patient characteristics: Patients referred for gastroscopic examination with duodenal biopsies and with suspected GI disorder, will be included consecutively.
Sample size: We aim to include 40 patients. No studies validating breath test results in our patient group are available. However, based on preliminary results suggesting that 35% of IBS patients have SI deficiency,13 we are 95% likely to find between 8 and 21 patients with SI deficiency when examining 40 patients. Assuming 80% concordance between the two methods to (correct proportion of successes), we would need 12 positive cases. Thus, if 40 individuals are included, the study is sufficiently powered (alpha=5% and beta=20%, using McNemar's test of concordance).
Study 2: Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency as a cause of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Objectives: To examine the effect of a 4-week SSRD on GI- and extraintestinal symptoms, gut microbiota composition and fecal fermentation in patients with IBS (with and without SI deficiency), and compare the SSRD with a 4-week low-FODMAP diet to investigate whether the patients with a breath test result indicating SI deficiency respond better to the SSRD than the patients with normal SI activity. Gut microbiota have been suggested to have a central role in IBS etiology, hence evaluation of gut microbiota composition and fecal fermentation will be included to increase the knowledge regarding the effects of dietary change on gut microbiota composition and activity related to SI deficiency.
Design: A randomized, open clinical crossover trial with a dietary intervention in a group of IBS patients, lasting for 4+4 weeks (SSRD vs. low-FODMAP) with a 1-week wash-out period in between. Breath tests will be taken at inclusion, but the results will be "blinded", e.g. not available for anyone conducting the trial before end of the study. A SSRD will be compared to the low-FODMAP diet. All participants will be given dietary advice from a registered clinical dietitian. Briefly, all forms of sucrose-containing foods (e.g. sweets, jam, and cakes) should be avoided, and foods rich in starch should be reduced on the SSRD.
Primary endpoint: Symptom severity by IBS-Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS).
Secondary endpoints: Gut microbiota composition, fecal fermentation measured by short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and assessment of quality of life by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29).
Recruitment and patient characteristics: IBS patients referred to the outpatient clinic at the Department of Gastroenterology at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital for dietary guidance by a registered dietitian will be consecutively included.
Sample size: The primary end point is change in IBS symptom severity (IBS-SSS) at the end of the treatment period relative to baseline, and the proportion of responders to the dietary intervention is based on the recommended cut-off of a reduction (ie, improvement) in total IBS-SSS score of 50 points, which is considered to be clinically meaningful improvement. To plan our sample size, we performed a power calculation based on the ability to detect a difference between the two diets in reduction of IBS-SSS score of at least 50 points with 80% power, assuming an SD of 100. The calculation indicated that we would need 64 patients. To allow for 15-20% drop-out, we aim to include 80 patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-FODMAP diet
Patients with IBS on a 4-week low-FODMAP diet.
Low-FODMAP diet
4 weeks of a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs)
Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet
Patients with IBS on a s 4-week Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD).
Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD)
4 weeks of a diet low in starch and sucrose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low-FODMAP diet
4 weeks of a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs)
Starch- and Sucrose Reduced Diet (SSRD)
4 weeks of a diet low in starch and sucrose
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI 18-30 kg/m2
* Referred for gastroscopic examination with suspected GI disorder
* Signed informed consent
* BMI 18-30 kg/m2
* IBS diagnosis according to Rome IV criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Sucrase-isomaltase deficiency as a cause of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (n=80)
* Inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease or diabetes mellitus
* Chronic immune diseases affecting the GI-system
* Unwilling/unable to maintain a stable diet throughout the study period
* Use of antibiotic treatment for the last 4 weeks
* Currently on a restrictive diet
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bergen
OTHER
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MED 358
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.