Assessing Ventilator Safety in Patients on Pressure-Support Ventilation
NCT ID: NCT05125952
Last Updated: 2025-10-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-08
2023-12-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT03715751
Lung and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation by Means of Assessing Respiratory Work
NCT03612583
Impact of the Assisted Ventilation Mode on Diaphragm Efficiency in Critically Ill Patients
NCT02473172
Evaluation of Auto-EPAP for Management of Upper Airway Obstruction During Non-Invasive Ventilation
NCT06560411
Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Set-up of Automated NIV in Obese Patients With Chronic Respiratory Failure
NCT02342899
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pressure-support ventilation (PSV) is a common mechanical ventilation mode often used in patients with active inspiratory efforts to help reduce patient inspiratory work and improve comfort. PSV effectively allows spontaneously breathing patients to determine their breath flow-rate and breath duration, eliminating flow and cycle dyssynchrony. However, pressure support ventilation does not allow for physicians to control tidal volume or driving pressure. The risk of SILI may thus be increased with PSV.
Several different methods have been proposed to address these challenges. However, to date none of these methods have been compared to assess for concordance in their ability to indicate an increased risk of self-induced lung injury. ASOP is a prospective cohort study comparing three methods for assessing risk of self-induced lung injury in patients with acute respiratory failure being managed with pressure-support ventilation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Acute Respiratory Failure
Patients with acute respiratory failure managed with pressure-support ventilation.
Viasys Avea Ventilator
Measuring dynamic airway driving pressure and static airway driving pressure during pressure support breath, and static airway driving pressure during a volume control breath. Measuring airway occlusion pressure during pressure support breath.
Philips Respironics NM3 device
Measuring static airway driving pressure during pressure support breath
Servo U ventilator
Measuring static airway driving pressure and p0.1 during pressure support breath.
Vyaire SmartCath adult nasogastric tube with Esophageal balloon
Measuring static and dynamic esophageal driving pressure during pressure support breath, and esophogeal pressure change during airway occlusion maneuver.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Viasys Avea Ventilator
Measuring dynamic airway driving pressure and static airway driving pressure during pressure support breath, and static airway driving pressure during a volume control breath. Measuring airway occlusion pressure during pressure support breath.
Philips Respironics NM3 device
Measuring static airway driving pressure during pressure support breath
Servo U ventilator
Measuring static airway driving pressure and p0.1 during pressure support breath.
Vyaire SmartCath adult nasogastric tube with Esophageal balloon
Measuring static and dynamic esophageal driving pressure during pressure support breath, and esophogeal pressure change during airway occlusion maneuver.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Managed in pressure-support mode of ventilation
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient or surrogate is unable to provide informed consent
* Currently pregnant
* Currently incarcerated
* Acute exacerbation of an obstructive lung disease
* Known esophageal varices or any other condition for which the attending physician deems an orogastric catheter to be unsafe
* Esophageal, gastric or duodenal surgical procedures within the last 6 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neil R MacIntyre, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beitler JR, Malhotra A, Thompson BT. Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Clin Chest Med. 2016 Dec;37(4):633-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.
Sottile PD, Albers D, Smith BJ, Moss MM. Ventilator dyssynchrony - Detection, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance: A Narrative review. Ann Thorac Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;15(4):190-198. doi: 10.4103/atm.ATM_63_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
Grieco DL, Menga LS, Eleuteri D, Antonelli M. Patient self-inflicted lung injury: implications for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS patients on non-invasive support. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1014-1023. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13418-9. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
Hess DR. Ventilator waveforms and the physiology of pressure support ventilation. Respir Care. 2005 Feb;50(2):166-86; discussion 183-6.
Mauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, Mojoli F, Chiumello D, Piquilloud L, Grasso S, Jubran A, Laghi F, Magder S, Pesenti A, Loring S, Gattinoni L, Talmor D, Blanch L, Amato M, Chen L, Brochard L, Mancebo J; PLeUral pressure working Group (PLUG-Acute Respiratory Failure section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine). Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00106860
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.