Oral Suction Intervention to Reduce Aspiration and Ventilator Events: NO-ASPIRATE

NCT ID: NCT02284178

Last Updated: 2019-08-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

513 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Insertion of a breathing tube to enable treatment with mechanical ventilation (respirator) is often associated with complications, such as infection and lung injury. Leakage of secretions around the breathing tube (microaspiration) is a major factor leading to complications. The investigators propose that a standardized, enhanced oral suction protocol will be effective in reducing microaspiration and harms associated with mechanical ventilation. The investigators hypothesize that those randomized to the enhanced oral suction protocol will have less microaspiration and other ventilator-associated conditions than those in the usual care, standard suction group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enhanced oral suction

Deep oropharyngeal suction with catheter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enhanced oropharyngeal suction

Intervention Type OTHER

Deep oropharyngeal suction with catheter every 4 hours

Usual Care Oral Suction

Oropharyngeal suction with suction swab

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Oral suction with suction swab every 4 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enhanced oropharyngeal suction

Deep oropharyngeal suction with catheter every 4 hours

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual Care

Oral suction with suction swab every 4 hours

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* orally intubated with endotracheal tube and treated with mechanical ventilation
* 24 hours or less since intubation
* expected to be intubated for at least 36 hours after enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

* documented aspiration at time of intubation
* intubation to treat known aspiration
* treatment with rescue mechanical ventilation therapies (oscillator)
* re-intubation
* contraindications to receiving the intervention (e.g., oral injuries)
* history of lung or head/neck cancers that may produce amylase in the lungs
* history of disease that affects saliva production (e.g., Sjögren's syndrome)
* prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orlando Regional Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Central Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary L Sole, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Univesity of Central Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orlando Regional Medical Center

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bourgault AM, Xie R, Talbert S, Sole ML. Association of enteral feeding with microaspiration in critically ill adults. Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Oct;67:151611. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151611. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36116866 (View on PubMed)

Talbert S, Bourgault AM, Rathbun KP, Abomoelak B, Deb C, Mehta D, Sole ML. Pepsin A in Tracheal Secretions From Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Crit Care. 2021 Nov 1;30(6):443-450. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021528.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34719715 (View on PubMed)

Sole ML, Talbert S, Yan X, Penoyer D, Mehta D, Bennett M, Emery KP, Middleton A, Deaton L, Abomoelak B, Deb C. Impact of deep oropharyngeal suctioning on microaspiration, ventilator events, and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3045-3057. doi: 10.1111/jan.14142. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31241194 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01NR014508-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.