Modulation of Frontoparietal Dynamics Underlying Adolescent Working Memory Deficits
NCT ID: NCT05119660
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2024-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accelerated iTBS Targeting of Working Memory Versus Inhibitory Control in Adolescent ADHD
NCT07219810
Brain Stimulation for Working Memory Deficits in Adolescents With ADHD
NCT03480737
A Trial of Two-Week Brain Stimulation for Teenagers With ADHD
NCT05102864
rTMS in Children and Adolescents With ADHD:
NCT06389864
Working Memory Training and Neurofeedback for Children With ADHD, a Pilot Study
NCT02754336
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Examine the effect of iTBS to the PPC on the encoding stage of WM. Hypothesis: Compared to sham and DLPFC conditions, iTBS to the IPL will increase theta-gamma coupling during encoding. Modulation of theta-gamma coupling will correlate with improved behavioral performance.
Aim 2: Examine the effect of iTBS to the PFC on the maintenance stage of WM. Hypothesis: Compared to sham and IPL conditions, iTBS to the DLPFC will increase theta-gamma coupling during maintenance. Modulation of theta-gamma coupling will correlate with improved behavioral performance.
Aim 3: Examine the feasibility and preliminary effect of individualized iTBS to the PFC. Hypothesis: It will be feasible to utilize peak theta-gamma coupling during the SWMT to identify optimal iTBS parameters. Individualized iTBS will increase theta-gamma coupling during WM demands and improve behavioral performance.
Exploratory Aim: Identify the neocortical circuitry underlying oscillatory modulation. Computational modeling designed for neural interpretation of EEG will translate obtained recordings into cellular/circuit-level activity delineating the neural mechanism of the observed modulation. Hypothesis: pyramidal-interneuron mechanisms within the PPC/PFC will underlie the theta/gamma oscillatory modulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient Arm
In a 2x2 factorial double-blind design, we will randomize a sample of adolescents (13-18 years) with WM deficits to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or inferior parietal lobule (IPL), based on each participant's structural brain MRI.
Participants in both arms will complete an active iTBS session and a sham iTBS session. The primary outcome will be theta-gamma coupling during WM demands, as measured via electroencephalography (EEG) during a Sternberg spatial WM task (SWMT) immediately before and after iTBS.
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
iTBS
Healthy Control Arm
Control Arm: A sample of healthy young adults (18-25 years) will receive an individualized theta-gamma parameters protocol of iTBS to the left DLPFC.
Participants in both arms will complete an active iTBS session and a sham iTBS session. The primary outcome will be theta-gamma coupling during WM demands, as measured via electroencephalography (EEG) during a Sternberg spatial WM task (SWMT) immediately before and after iTBS.
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
iTBS
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
iTBS
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. English fluency of the participant and the legal guardian/parent
3. 13-18 years
4. Parent rating on BRIEF-2 Working Memory: Greater than 1.0 SD above normative mean.
5. IQ \> 80
6. Clinical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): predominantly inattentive type, predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type, combined type, or unspecified type. Diagnostic criteria will be confirmed with NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales-Parent.
1. Ability to provide consent
2. English fluency of the participant
3. 18-25 years
4. Never diagnosed or meets current criteria for a psychiatric disorder, as measured by self-report of prior diagnoses and formal completion of the diagnostic interview.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures
3. History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy
4. Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder
5. Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.)
6. Contraindicated metal implants in the head, brain or spinal cord (excluding dental implants, braces or fillings)
7. Non-removable makeup or piercings
8. Pacemaker
9. Implanted medication pump
10. Vagal nerve stimulator
11. Deep brain stimulator
12. TENS unit (unless removed completely for the study)
13. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
14. Signs of increased intracranial pressure
15. Intracranial lesion (including incidental finding on MRI)
16. History of head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness
17. Substance abuse or dependence within past six months (i.e., DSM-5 substance use disorder criteria)
18. Chronic treatment with prescription medications that decrease cortical seizure threshold, not including psychostimulant medication if deemed to be medically safe as part of the medical review process.
19. Active psychosis or mania
20. Current suicidal intent
21. Current pregnancy
22. Significant visual, hearing or speech impairment
23. Current wards of the state
13 Years
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Funding Source: COBRE Center for Neuromodulation at Butler Hospital (Pilot Project)
UNKNOWN
Bradley Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
E. P. Bradley Hospital
East Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BradleyH002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.