Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

NCT ID: NCT00453921

Last Updated: 2018-06-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2013-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem, with 1.5-2.0 million Americans injured each year. Cognitive deficits, particularly in the domains of memory and attention are frequently the source of lingering disability after TBI and a source of enormous distress to the injured individuals and their family/caregivers. To date, interventions to ameliorate chronic cognitive deficits have been directed at either pharmacological interventions or cognitive rehabilitation. We propose to (1) To compare the efficacy of three interventions: memory and attention training (MAAT), methylphenidate, and memory/attention training in combination with methylphenidate and (2) use functional MRI (fMRI) to characterize changes in activation of the neural circuitry of memory and attention due to MAAT alone, methylphenidate alone, and MAAT in combination with methylphenidate. This is a two by two design with medication (methylphenidate/placebo) and cognitive therapy (Memory and Attention Training (MAAT) or an Attention control intervention) as possible interventions. Using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, 200 individuals with persistent cognitive deficits 6-12 months after MTBI will be randomized to receive a six week trial of either (1) MAAT and placebo, (2) MAAT and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), (3) attention control intervention and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), or (4) attention control intervention and placebo. Symptom distress, attention and memory performance, and activation patterns of the neural circuitry of attention and memory while undergoing fMRI will be characterized at baseline, and after the four treatment conditions. This study will provide important information on three interventions for the most disabling sequelae of an enormous public health problem. Further, it will help to clarify underlying neural mechanisms and suggest additional treatment possibilities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Summary and Gaps to be Addressed by the Proposed Study

What is known: There are two interventions of promising efficacy in ameliorating deficits in attention and memory after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): (i) memory and attention training/rehabilitation, and (ii) catecholaminergic augmentation (particularly with methylphenidate - which augments both dopaminergic and adrenergic systems). fMRI and other functional imaging strategies are providing valuable insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of the cognitive enhancing effects of methylphenidate in some neuropsychiatric populations (individuals with ADHD), and the effects of cognitive rehabilitation efforts in some domains (e.g. speech and language in individuals after stroke).

What is not known: To date there are no studies that apply a psychopharmacological strategy of augmenting neurotransmitter systems known to modulate memory/attention (dopaminergic and adrenergic systems) in combination with a cognitive rehabilitation intervention known to improve memory/attention (memory/attention training) in individuals with MTBI. We are aware of no published studies that use fMRI to assess the neural mechanisms of memory/attention improvement from the use of catecholaminergic agents or memory/attention training in individuals with MTBI. It is important to determine the efficacy of combined memory/attention training and methylphenidate. It is equally important to begin to understand the neural mechanisms underlying effective treatment as it may help to inform the development of the next generation of interventions and perhaps lead to individually tailored treatment interventions. This proposal will start to address these gaps in our knowledge.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Placebo Capsule and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Placebo as both conditions)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo as both treatments

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training

2

Methylphenidate capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Active therapy)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Methylphenidate

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage dependent on weight

Memory and Attention Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Weekly Memory and Attention Training with at home practice.

3

Methylphenidate capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Placebo therapy)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Methylphenidate

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosage dependent on weight

4

Placebo capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Placebo Med/Active therapy)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Memory and Attention Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Weekly Memory and Attention Training with at home practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methylphenidate

Dosage dependent on weight

Intervention Type DRUG

Memory and Attention Training

Weekly Memory and Attention Training with at home practice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Placebo as both treatments

Placebo capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: Individuals aged 18-65 who sustained a mild to severe TBI 4 months prior to study entry.
3. Cognitive Deficits: Subjects will have either subjective and objective evidence of persistent cognitive deficits. Subjects must report persistent memory or attention deficits as a result of their injury, which are of sufficient severity to interfere with social and/or occupational functioning. Subjects must either score more than 2 standard deviations below the age adjusted norm or estimates of baseline premorbid function on one or more tests of attention and/or memory administered as part of the baseline screening cognitive battery (see below), or score greater than 1.0 standard deviations below either age adjusted norms or estimates of premorbid function on 2 or more of the screening tests.

Exclusion Criteria

The following factors will exclude otherwise eligible subjects from participation:

1. a history of other neurologic disorders (such as epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, mental retardation, neurodegenerative disorders)
2. significant systemic medical illness such as clinically significant liver disease, renal disease, atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease, or hypertension requiring medication management
3. current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Axis I diagnosis of psychiatric illness other than substance abuse. We have given careful consideration to the inclusion of the latter group given our use of a stimulant with potential abuse properties. Because of the potential for cross-over abuse with cocaine, amphetamines, and other stimulants, individuals with such histories will be excluded from this study. Individuals with history of otherwise uncomplicated ethanol or other non-stimulant drug abuse currently in stable remission will be eligible. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (MINI) will be used to screen for psychiatric illness
4. women currently pregnant or lactating. Female participants will be asked to take a pregnancy test to confirm they are not currently pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laura Flashman

Professor of Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas W McAllister, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado at Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McAllister TW, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, Saykin AJ. Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Oct;23(10):1450-67. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1450.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17020482 (View on PubMed)

Neurobehavioral Guidelines Working Group; Warden DL, Gordon B, McAllister TW, Silver JM, Barth JT, Bruns J, Drake A, Gentry T, Jagoda A, Katz DI, Kraus J, Labbate LA, Ryan LM, Sparling MB, Walters B, Whyte J, Zapata A, Zitnay G. Guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Oct;23(10):1468-501. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1468.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17020483 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Rhodes CH, Flashman LA, McDonald BC, Belloni D, Saykin AJ. Effect of the dopamine D2 receptor T allele on response latency after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;162(9):1749-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1749.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16135640 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Flashman LA, Sparling MB, Saykin AJ. Working memory deficits after traumatic brain injury: catecholaminergic mechanisms and prospects for treatment -- a review. Brain Inj. 2004 Apr;18(4):331-50. doi: 10.1080/02699050310001617370.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14742148 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Ferrell RB. Evaluation and treatment of psychosis after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):357-68.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12547983 (View on PubMed)

Flashman LA, McAllister TW. Lack of awareness and its impact in traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):285-96.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12547977 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Arciniegas D. Evaluation and treatment of postconcussive symptoms. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):265-83.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12547976 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW. Evaluation and treatment of neurobehavioral complications of traumatic brain injury--have we made any progress? NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):263-4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12547975 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, Saykin AJ. Neuroimaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec;23(6):775-91. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.6.775.1026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11910544 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, Guerin SJ, Mamourian AC, Saykin AJ. Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1004-12. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0899.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11697932 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, Sparling MB, Johnson SC, Guerin SJ, Mamourian AC, Weaver JB, Yanofsky N. Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Neurology. 1999 Oct 12;53(6):1300-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.6.1300.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10522888 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW. Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychosis: What Is the Connection? Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):211-223.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10085209 (View on PubMed)

Flashman LA, Amador X, McAllister TW. Lack of Awareness of Deficits in Traumatic Brain Injury. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):201-210.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10085208 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW, Green RL. Traumatic Brain Injury: A Model of Acquired Psychiatric Illness? Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 1998 Jul;3(3):158-159. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10085203 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW. Evaluation of brain injury related behavioral disturbances in community mental health centers. Community Ment Health J. 1997 Aug;33(4):341-58; discussion 359-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1025055426260.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9250431 (View on PubMed)

Silver JM, McAllister TW. Forensic issues in the neuropsychiatric evaluation of the patient with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997 Winter;9(1):102-13. doi: 10.1176/jnp.9.1.102. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9017537 (View on PubMed)

McAllister TW. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of head injuries. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;15(2):395-413.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1603732 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.bianh.org

Brain Injury Association of New Hampshire

http://www.biavt.org/

Brain Injury Association of Vermont

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01HD047242

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

17363

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stimulant Effects on Brain Activity
NCT02453698 COMPLETED PHASE1