Spinal Cord sTimulation thEraPy for Parkinson's Disease Patients With Gait Problems
NCT ID: NCT05110053
Last Updated: 2025-05-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2024-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
With this double-blind placebo-controlled proof of concept and feasibility imaging study, we aim to shed light on the mechanism of action of SCS and collect data to inform development of a scientifically sound clinical trial protocol. We also hope to identify imaging biomarkers at baseline that could be predictive of a favourable or a negative outcome of SCS and improve patient selection. Patients will be assessed with clinical rating scales and gait evaluations at baseline and 6 and 12 months after SCS. They will also receive serial 18F-FDG and (\[18F\]FEOBV) PET scans to assess the effects of SCS on cortical/subcortical activity and brain cholinergic function
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease
NCT06005584
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease
NCT06798844
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Self-Management of Gait, Speech, and Dexterity Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Using a Smartphone Application
NCT05120609
Exploit the Neural Source and the Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease and Multiple System Atrophy
NCT03721887
The Role of Cerebellar Hyperactivity in Parkinson's Disease
NCT02349789
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy to treat chronic back and neuropathic pain.
Several studies have shown an improvement in gait function in PD patients following SCS for back pain. More recently, a small number of PD patients with gait dysfunction (without back pain) were treated with encouraging initial results on gait function and with few adverse events. However, the trials performed so far have left a number of unanswered questions with SCS that need to be addressed before this procedure can be used more widely in PD patients with gait problems. Firstly, all the published studies are unblinded and carried out in small cohorts of PD patients. Secondly, while these studies have shown that, overall, SCS seems to have a beneficial effect on gait in PD, they have also shown a heterogeneous outcome, as some patients had a poor response to treatment. Thirdly, patient selection and gait characterisation in these studies was limited, and this lack of clinical phenotyping could have been responsible for the heterogeneous outcome of these studies. Fourthly, mechanisms of actions of SCS are uncertain/unstudied in these papers. Therefore, a prospective, double-blind clinical trial with a scientifically sound study protocol in larger cohort of well-characterised patients is required in order to provide clear Class I evidence whether SCS is effective in improving gait function in PD. Additionally, the exact mechanisms of action of SCS in PD patients with gait problems are uncertain, as they have not been fully investigated so far. Animal models of PD, including non-human primates, show that SCS improves locomotion by activating the dorsal column-medial lemniscal pathway which in turn desynchronizes abnormal corticostriatal oscillations. Inputs from ascending leminiscal and extralemniscal pathways to the brainstem and thalamus that may modulate the supplementary motor area (SMA) are also highly connected to the cholinergic PPN in the brainstem. In turn, the SMA has cortifugal projections to PPN, as part of the circuit that controls anticipatory postural adjustments. Therefore, SCS might modulate the activity of SMA, globus pallidus and PPN that are impaired in patients with FoG.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used to assess in vivo these changes induced by SCS on the brain cholinergic function and the motor and associative cortical-subcortical loops.
(\[18F\]FEOBV) PET is an in vivo marker of the brain vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) and provides information of the functional integrity of the brain cholinergic neurotransmitter system. Using (\[18F\]FEOBV) PET we have recently showed reduced striatal and limbic archicortical VAChT binding in patients who suffer from FoG compared to participants who do not suffer from this. 18F-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET is a marker of regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate (rCMRglc), Over the last three decades, studies of regional cerebral glucose metabolism have provided insight into the pathophysiology of the cerebral dysfunction underlying PD and other movement disorders. 18F-FDG PET has also been extensively used to assess the effects of pallidotomy and DBS on the motor and associative cortical-subcortical loops.
Therefore, PET imaging with (\[18F\]FEOBV) PET and 18F-FDG before and after SCS treatment could significantly improve the understanding of the mechanisms of actions of SCS and its effects on brain cholinergic neurotransmission and resting metabolic brain networks. This knowledge may be helpful in selecting the right patient group for the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active
All patients will receive surgery with implantation of a SCS device. Patients randomized to the active arm, will receive active stimulation. Blinding will continue for 6 months, followed by a 6 month voluntary open-phase, active extension.
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Spinal Cord stimulation. Surgery is done in local anaesthesia. A small electrode is placed in the epidural space corresponding approximately at the Th8-Th10 level.
An impulsegenerator, connected to the electrode, is placed in the subcutaneus fat in the gluteal region.
Placebo
All patients will receive surgery with implantation of a SCS device. Patients randomized to the placebo-arm of the trial will have the device switched off. Blinding will continue for 6 months, followed by a 6 month voluntary open-phase, active extension.
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Spinal Cord stimulation. Surgery is done in local anaesthesia. A small electrode is placed in the epidural space corresponding approximately at the Th8-Th10 level.
An impulsegenerator, connected to the electrode, is placed in the subcutaneus fat in the gluteal region.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Spinal Cord stimulation. Surgery is done in local anaesthesia. A small electrode is placed in the epidural space corresponding approximately at the Th8-Th10 level.
An impulsegenerator, connected to the electrode, is placed in the subcutaneus fat in the gluteal region.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Presence of gait functional impairment despite optimal medical management
3. Able to walk independently without an aid for a minimum of two minutes without rest
4. Absence of secondary causes of gait problems
5. Able to understand study requirements - able to provide consent
6. Above 50 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
2. Spinal anatomical abnormalities precluding SCS surgery
3. History of stroke or structural lesions on CT that could interfere with image analysis.
4. History of chronic pain and severe degenerative spine disease with or without chronic pain
5. History of drug addiction or dependency
6. Previous DBS surgery for PD
7. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicola Pavese, MD, PhD, FRCP, FEAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hvingelby VS, Hojholt Terkelsen M, Johnsen EL, Moller M, Danielsen EH, Henriksen T, Glud AN, Tai Y, Moller Andersen AS, Meier K, Borghammer P, Moro E, Sorensen JCH, Pavese N. Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with Parkinson's disease and gait problems (STEP-PD): study protocol for an exploratory, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled feasibility trial. BMJ Neurol Open. 2022 Aug 24;4(2):e000333. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2022-000333. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STEP-PD-449
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.