The Spinal Navigation Trial - Surgical Navigation or Free Hand Technique in Spine Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05107310
Last Updated: 2025-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-18
2029-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating the Accuracy of Navigation Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement of Spine Surgery
NCT01247948
The European Robotic Spinal Instrumentation (EUROSPIN) Study
NCT03398915
Observational Clinical Study to Plan, Position and Check Instrument Placement for Spine Surgery Interventions
NCT03015142
Advanced SPinal Innovations With Robotics and Enabling Technology Registry
NCT05071144
Comparing 3D and 2D Views in Biportal Spine Surgery: A Pilot Simulation Study
NCT07171801
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The pedicle is narrow and misplaced pedicle screws can result in vascular, pulmonary or neural injuries, or inadequate bone purchase. Compared to the conventional free-hand surgical technique, which relies on the knowledge of anatomy, computer-assisted navigation using intraoperative 3D imaging has been shown to improve screw placement accuracy and reduce complications due to screw misplacements. As a consequence, navigation may also reduce the frequency of postoperative revision surgery compared to free hand. However, navigation still takes time, and is associated with higher intraoperative radiation than the free hand technique.
As of yet, the majority of data in this area are based on retrospectively collected series, and some prospectively collected series, while randomized controlled trials on spinal deformity are lacking.
In this randomized controlled trial the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN), infra-red surgical navigation (IRSN) and conventional free-hand technique will be investigated.
Patients of age 12 years and older with spinal deformities are randomized into one of the three surgical techniques mentioned above.
The primary outcome variable is pedicle screw placement accuracy at 1st attempt assessed using the Gertzbein scale.
Data from the navigated groups (ASRN and IRSN) will be analyzed together, and compared with the free hand groups analyzed together. The ASRN and ISRN groups will also be compared with their respective free hand groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Navigation group 1 ARSN
Augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN). Pedicle screw placement using the Philips ClarifEye system combined with Philips Allura for imaging.
Pedicle screws insertion using ARSN
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) with the ClarifEye navigation system and the Philips Allura 2D/3D imaging system.
Control group 1 FH
Free hand (FH) surgical technique. Pedicle screw placement using conventional free hand technique.
Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using free hand technique with the help of intraoperative fluoroscopy if needed.
Navigation group 2 IRSN
Infrared surgical navigation (IRSN). Pedicle screw placement using Brainlab Curve 1.2 combined with Medtronic o-arm for imaging.
Pedicle screws insertion using IRSN
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using infra-red surgical navigation (IRSN) with the Brainlab Curve 1.2 navigation system combined with the Medtronic O-arm 2D/3D imaging system.
Control group 2 FH
Free hand (FH) surgical technique. Pedicle screw placement using conventional free hand technique.
Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using free hand technique with the help of intraoperative fluoroscopy if needed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pedicle screws insertion by free hand technique
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using free hand technique with the help of intraoperative fluoroscopy if needed.
Pedicle screws insertion using ARSN
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) with the ClarifEye navigation system and the Philips Allura 2D/3D imaging system.
Pedicle screws insertion using IRSN
Spinal deformity correction. Pedicle screws are inserted using infra-red surgical navigation (IRSN) with the Brainlab Curve 1.2 navigation system combined with the Medtronic O-arm 2D/3D imaging system.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 12 years and older
* Spinal deformity surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgery without pedicle screws
* Previous surgery with pedicle screws in the planned surgical area
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska University Hospital
OTHER
Uppsala University
OTHER
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Gerdhem
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Gerdhem, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
El-Hajj VG, Charalampidis A, Fell D, Edstrom E, Elmi-Terander A, Gerdhem P. Study protocol: the SPInal NAVigation (SPINAV) trial - comparison of augmented reality surgical navigation, conventional image-guided navigation, and free-hand technique for pedicle screw placement in spinal deformity surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 2;26(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08817-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPINAV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.