Evaluation of Fluid Volume in Patients With Refractory Hypotension (Fresh-ER)

NCT ID: NCT05101031

Last Updated: 2023-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-18

Study Completion Date

2022-12-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to observe the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during rapid fluid bolus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Noninvasive Starling SV (Baxter Healthcare) is a portable, non-invasive, cardiac output detector system. The Starling SV system measures the cardiac output by employing electrical bioreactance. Bioreactance is a measure of the electrical characteristics of a volume of tissue and fluid. In the case of cardiac output measurements, the relevant tissue includes the heart and the immediate surrounding volume of the thorax. The relevant fluid is blood.

The objective of the study is observe the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial resuscitation of 30 ml/kg of fluid, to evaluate the feasibility of performing a larger prospective RCT of SV-guided resuscitation in patients who undergo a dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness to help guide fluid administration.

This study is a prospective feasibility study. Patients will be evaluated by the Emergency Room team for Inclusion/Exclusion criteria. If the patient is found to fit the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, then the fully non-invasive Starling monitor will be applied to the patient and the patient's hemodynamic data will be prospectively collected during the initial fluid resuscitation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Undifferentated Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Denver Health Medical Center

SV machine will be attached if hypotensive and in the emergency department

Starling SV

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Starling SV will monitor the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial fluid resuscitation in individuals with hypotension related to infection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Starling SV

The Starling SV will monitor the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial fluid resuscitation in individuals with hypotension related to infection.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Primary Criteria

1. MAP \<65
2. SBP \<90 or BP rapidly trending lower

Secondary Criteria
3. Low urine output Acute change in urine output less than 50ml/4 hours
4. Persistent hyperlactatemia
5. A new vasopressor started
6. Acute change in HR less than 50 or greater than 120
7. New onset chest pain or chest pain different then admission assessment
8. Acute bleeding
9. Fever \> 39 degrees
10. Significant change in mental status: confusion, agitation, delirium, etc.
11. Unexplained lethargy
12. CRT \>2 seconds -

Exclusion Criteria

1. Primary diagnosis of: acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary edema, status asthmatics, major cardiac arrhythmia, drug overdose, or injury from burn or trauma
2. Known aortic insufficiency, or aortic abnormalities
3. Requires immediate surgery
4. Advanced directives restricting implementation of the resuscitation protocol
5. Known intraventricular heart defect, such as VSD or ASD
6. Prisoner
7. Pregnancy
8. Age \<18
9. Known allergy to sensor material or gel
10. Suspected intra-abdominal hypertension
11. Inability to obtain IV access
12. Patient should be excluded based on the opinion of the Clinician/Investigator
13. Patient has an unstable airway
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oregon Health and Science University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ivor Douglas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ivor Douglas

Chief of Pulmonary and Medical Critical Care

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ivor Douglas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Denver Health Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Denver Health Medical Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):659-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-0994-y. Epub 2008 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18214429 (View on PubMed)

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1774-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23774337 (View on PubMed)

Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002 Jun;121(6):2000-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12065368 (View on PubMed)

Kelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Schenck L, Kennedy CC. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. 2015 Jan;43(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000268.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25247784 (View on PubMed)

Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20975548 (View on PubMed)

Vincent et al. Sepsis in European ICU: Results of the SOAP study. British Journal of Anesthesia 2006; 113: 740-747.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-2845

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Capnogram and Fluid Responsiveness
NCT03788707 WITHDRAWN NA
Fluid Volume During Fluid Shifts
NCT03447574 COMPLETED NA