Evaluation of Fluid Volume in Patients With Refractory Hypotension (Fresh-ER)
NCT ID: NCT05101031
Last Updated: 2023-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-12-18
2022-12-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension
NCT02837731
Fluid Responsiveness Prediction Using Extra Systoles
NCT02520037
A Prospective Observational Study of the Expectations and Physiological Effects of Fluid Bolus Therapy
NCT03178578
Fluid Responsiveness Prediction During Prone Position
NCT05898269
Extension of the RUSH Protocol for Volume Responsiveness
NCT03285269
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of the study is observe the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial resuscitation of 30 ml/kg of fluid, to evaluate the feasibility of performing a larger prospective RCT of SV-guided resuscitation in patients who undergo a dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness to help guide fluid administration.
This study is a prospective feasibility study. Patients will be evaluated by the Emergency Room team for Inclusion/Exclusion criteria. If the patient is found to fit the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, then the fully non-invasive Starling monitor will be applied to the patient and the patient's hemodynamic data will be prospectively collected during the initial fluid resuscitation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Denver Health Medical Center
SV machine will be attached if hypotensive and in the emergency department
Starling SV
The Starling SV will monitor the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial fluid resuscitation in individuals with hypotension related to infection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Starling SV
The Starling SV will monitor the change in hemodynamic variables (i.e. CO, SV, HR, SV) as assessed during the initial fluid resuscitation in individuals with hypotension related to infection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. MAP \<65
2. SBP \<90 or BP rapidly trending lower
Secondary Criteria
3. Low urine output Acute change in urine output less than 50ml/4 hours
4. Persistent hyperlactatemia
5. A new vasopressor started
6. Acute change in HR less than 50 or greater than 120
7. New onset chest pain or chest pain different then admission assessment
8. Acute bleeding
9. Fever \> 39 degrees
10. Significant change in mental status: confusion, agitation, delirium, etc.
11. Unexplained lethargy
12. CRT \>2 seconds -
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known aortic insufficiency, or aortic abnormalities
3. Requires immediate surgery
4. Advanced directives restricting implementation of the resuscitation protocol
5. Known intraventricular heart defect, such as VSD or ASD
6. Prisoner
7. Pregnancy
8. Age \<18
9. Known allergy to sensor material or gel
10. Suspected intra-abdominal hypertension
11. Inability to obtain IV access
12. Patient should be excluded based on the opinion of the Clinician/Investigator
13. Patient has an unstable airway
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Ivor Douglas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ivor Douglas
Chief of Pulmonary and Medical Critical Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ivor Douglas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Denver Health Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):659-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-0994-y. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1774-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd.
Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002 Jun;121(6):2000-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000.
Kelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Schenck L, Kennedy CC. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. 2015 Jan;43(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000268.
Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15.
Vincent et al. Sepsis in European ICU: Results of the SOAP study. British Journal of Anesthesia 2006; 113: 740-747.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-2845
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.