Prospective Validation of a Points Score System Predicting 30-day Survival
NCT ID: NCT05100342
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
114 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-12
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional Imaging of Treatment Effects: A Companion Protocol to a Study of Extracranial Stereotactic Radioablation in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00246116
Simulation-Free, Single-Fraction Palliative Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Bone Metastases
NCT07202273
An Evaluation of Dose-escalation for Intrathoracic Tumours
NCT06794125
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, or Prostate Cancer
NCT02206334
Prognosis of Patient Evaluated for Palliative Radiotherapy
NCT03797755
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Objective:
1\. To evaluate 30-day survival of patients with a score of \>14 (high-risk group)
Secondary Objectives:
1. To evaluate 30-day, 90-day, and 365-day survival of patients in low-risk (score 0-6), and intermediate-risk (score 7-13) groups, and to evaluate 90-day and 365-day survival of patients in high-risk group (score \>14)
2. To evaluate patient-reported quality of life at the above intervals using the validated FACIT-Pal-14© questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care 14 Item Version)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-risk
Low-risk:score 0-6
Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival
This tool requires laboratory data including white blood cell count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and red cell distribution, as well as number of attendances to the emergency room in the past 100 days, the site receiving radiation therapy, and the primary cancer type. Each data point correlates with a point value, which are tallied to generate a final score.
The scores range from 0-20, with 0 giving the highest chance for survival at 30 days and 20 giving the lowest chance for survival at 30 days
Intermediate-risk
Intermediate-risk: score 7-13
Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival
This tool requires laboratory data including white blood cell count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and red cell distribution, as well as number of attendances to the emergency room in the past 100 days, the site receiving radiation therapy, and the primary cancer type. Each data point correlates with a point value, which are tallied to generate a final score.
The scores range from 0-20, with 0 giving the highest chance for survival at 30 days and 20 giving the lowest chance for survival at 30 days
High-risk
High-risk:score 14-20
Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival
This tool requires laboratory data including white blood cell count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and red cell distribution, as well as number of attendances to the emergency room in the past 100 days, the site receiving radiation therapy, and the primary cancer type. Each data point correlates with a point value, which are tallied to generate a final score.
The scores range from 0-20, with 0 giving the highest chance for survival at 30 days and 20 giving the lowest chance for survival at 30 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Point score prediction tool for 30-day survival
This tool requires laboratory data including white blood cell count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and red cell distribution, as well as number of attendances to the emergency room in the past 100 days, the site receiving radiation therapy, and the primary cancer type. Each data point correlates with a point value, which are tallied to generate a final score.
The scores range from 0-20, with 0 giving the highest chance for survival at 30 days and 20 giving the lowest chance for survival at 30 days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Ability to provide written informed consent
3. Cancer diagnosis referred to Radiation Oncology for palliative radiation therapy
4. Patients who either choose to not receive radiation therapy or not recommended to receive radiation therapy will remain eligible
5. Those patients who undergo a course of palliative radiation therapy, it is not the requirement of this study to complete that course of treatment. Those who prematurely end their course of treatment will remain eligible Note: Patients who ultimately either choose to not receive radiation or not recommended to receive radiation will remain eligible
Note: Patients who ultimately do not complete prescribed radiation will remain eligible
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who are receiving definitive/curative course of radiation therapy
3. Patients who self-report as pregnant or nursing
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Naoyuki G. Saito, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Naoyuki Saito, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IU Health West
Avon, Indiana, United States
IU Health North / Schwarz Cancer Center
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Naoyuki G Saito, MD PhD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTO-IUSCCC-0763
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.